Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Sad 70MM Days of Heaven news

   
Author Topic: Sad 70MM Days of Heaven news
Tom Maguire
Film Handler

Posts: 9
From: Keene, NH USA
Registered: Jun 2009


 - posted 09-21-2009 07:52 AM      Profile for Tom Maguire   Email Tom Maguire   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As a consolation to pulling a print on us at the last minute - Paramount offered us Days of Heaven in 70 last month and we were elated. Cut to a month later and I open the cans to find the print faded beyond recognition.

So unfortunately this show was a bust, and this print is at the end of it's life.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-21-2009 08:41 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is very likely the exact same print we ran back in the early 90's in Chicago. BAck then it was the only circulating print as well.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 09-21-2009 01:13 PM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I acquired a 70mm print of "Gandhi" all 3.5 hours of it and same thing, way too red to even run.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Weitzel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Vacaville, CA (1790 miles west of Rockwall)
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-21-2009 01:17 PM      Profile for Sean Weitzel   Email Sean Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sam, how many reels is that print of Gandhi?

 |  IP: Logged

Karl Borowski
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 161
From: Sulking in GameFAQ Forum
Registered: Sep 2009


 - posted 09-21-2009 01:31 PM      Profile for Karl Borowski   Email Karl Borowski   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Probably Eastman print stock :-/

Then again, I guess storage, heat, and humidity play into this as much as the stock itself does.

Apparently, with the old acetate stock, vinegar syndrome is accentuated more by *not* playing the movie than by heat.

This is one thing I really like about estar; it is, essentially, permanent base.

Acetate is, in some cases, worse than nitrate was in terms of base and spatial longevity.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-21-2009 01:33 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Any Eastman color films prior to 1983 are likely to turn red...those from 1983 and beyond will hold their color much better.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-21-2009 01:47 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Karl said "Apparently, with the old acetate stock, vinegar syndrome is accentuated more by *not* playing the movie than by heat."
Mag tracks actually cause a reaction in the base that accelerates VS

 |  IP: Logged

Bobby Henderson
"Ask me about Trajan."

Posts: 10973
From: Lawton, OK, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-21-2009 06:00 PM      Profile for Bobby Henderson   Email Bobby Henderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wonder about the condition of the original camera negatives. Are they still any good? As great as the cinematography looked it would seem to be worthy of a 4K digital scan and DI treatment to use on a Blu-ray release.

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-21-2009 06:29 PM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Tom Maguire
Cut to a month later and I open the cans to find the print faded beyond recognition.
I know the answer to this already [Roll Eyes] but why would they bother sending a faded beyond recognition 70mm print all the way to you? Hope they're not charging you for the freight.

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 09-21-2009 06:50 PM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
About 10 years ago, I walked into the Rahway NJ film exchange (I believe it was the exchange that became ETS), which covered the NYC metro area. They had a wall of 70mm Days Of Heaven prints stacked floor to ceiling near the loading dock. Apparently the prints were being shipped to California for eventual destruction.

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Maguire
Film Handler

Posts: 9
From: Keene, NH USA
Registered: Jun 2009


 - posted 09-21-2009 11:20 PM      Profile for Tom Maguire   Email Tom Maguire   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm just guessing but I would say that Some Guy in an office of Paramount looks at a list of available prints, sees Days of Heaven 70mm and says "Hey..."
And then thousands of miles away on the East Coast is that print that's been sitting in a depot that isn't climate controlled and that no one's taken a look at in years.

Just a guess.

 |  IP: Logged

Sean Weitzel
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 619
From: Vacaville, CA (1790 miles west of Rockwall)
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-21-2009 11:50 PM      Profile for Sean Weitzel   Email Sean Weitzel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A photographic record of the aforementioned Chicago screening along with said print (in it's former glory days sitting on a potts platter) can be seen right here on film-tech. Click the pictures button on the left and scroll down to "Cinema Borealis 1989"

 |  IP: Logged

Sam D. Chavez
Film God

Posts: 2153
From: Martinez, CA USA
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 09-22-2009 01:03 AM      Profile for Sam D. Chavez   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sean,

Too many is the short answer, but 14 seems to ring a bell. I ran a reel at the Fox California and confirmed it's essentially unwatchable. Sound is still OK.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.