Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Major Interlocks (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Major Interlocks
Alex Edwards
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 114
From: Iowa
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 09-21-2009 12:18 AM      Profile for Alex Edwards   Email Alex Edwards       Edit/Delete Post 
Ive gone through posts in the past few years and seen interlocks of 5 or 6 mentioned where it was regarded as out of the norm. I was curious to see if 8 years ago people wern't as eager to even attempt a larger interlock for a paying audience. In the past year our theater has interlocked 10 projectors for the Dark Knight midnight show and the recent Harry Potter midnight. I've seen the Interlocking 101 but that wasn't with an audience was it?

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-21-2009 01:00 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Interlocking 101 was not done for an audience, but I have done many, many one-print/all-complex interlocks in the past. Its really no big deal so long as you know what you are doing.

 |  IP: Logged

Greg Anderson
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 766
From: Ogden Valley, Utah
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 09-21-2009 09:45 AM      Profile for Greg Anderson   Author's Homepage   Email Greg Anderson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When I think about major interlocks, I sometimes wonder about the potential for disaster. Granted, I can't remember any interlock disaster stories around these forums (maybe I just wasn't paying attention) but... come on! Ten projectors running the same piece of film. If any one of them malfunctions then you lose all ten shows, right? Does anyone freak out over that kind of risk? Do any companies or managers prohibit interlocks beyond a certain number of screens?

quote: Brad Miller
Its really no big deal so long as you know what you are doing.
And I admit that I haven't been a projectionist for many years now, so I never learned interlocking. Then again, I never did changeovers until someone needed me to run one screening at the Sundance Institute a few years ago. I watched another guy run a show and that's all I needed to know. Of course, he thought I'd never figure out how to do it but it was a piece of cake.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 09-21-2009 09:59 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have done a five theater interlock as a test a few times on equipment that wasn't setup to interlock just to prove that it was possible to the management. I agree with Brad... not a big deal if you know what you're doing.

On the other hand...

I've seen a two auditorium interlock of a midnight show of Return of the King break after the projectionist and everyone else but one manager and one usher went home resulting in a near riot, the police being called, and a front page news story the next day. (I wasn't working that night.) So you have to be smart about interlocking too. If the manager on staff is not capable of running an interlock show (or more importantly fixing a broken one) with one hand tied behind her back, you don't send the projectionist home to save a couple of payroll hours.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin McCaffery
Film God

Posts: 2481
From: Montgomery, AL
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-21-2009 10:11 AM      Profile for Martin McCaffery   Author's Homepage   Email Martin McCaffery   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wait!
1) They actually have projectionists
2) They actually send them home while film is still running?!?!

Is this a standard practice everywhere?

 |  IP: Logged

Demetris Thoupis
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1240
From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 09-21-2009 10:33 AM      Profile for Demetris Thoupis   Email Demetris Thoupis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now with Digital the usher presses the play button [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-21-2009 10:41 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It's actually not uncommon for the projectionist at an automated multiplex to only be scheduled until 15-30 minutes after the last show start. The manager is then supposed to keep an eye on things and shut down the equipment at the end of the night.

I don't feel good about this (and have actually left a 3-screen interlock running), but it causes few problems in practice, much as I hate to say that.

I've also seen schedules where the manager threads and starts the first shows of the day and the operator comes in about half an hour before the first shows end to run the rest of the day's shows. Again, it's not an ideal situation, but it's what the major chains seem to want.

As for interlocks, the most I've ever done is only three screens, and I doubt that I'll ever do an interlock show again.

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Skilton
Film Handler

Posts: 43
From: Bromley, Kent, UK
Registered: May 2009


 - posted 09-21-2009 11:03 AM      Profile for Matt Skilton   Author's Homepage   Email Matt Skilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The mere thought of our managers starting and/or finishing shows makes me laugh but also shiver in sheer fright. One of them doesn't even like helping me move films because he's scared of them.

I had to do a three screen interlock with Quantum of Solace at our multiplex - first time it's be done for a public show. Usually we only do two screen interlocks. For the big films we get 2-3 prints so that reduces the need for them.

 |  IP: Logged

Alex Edwards
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 114
From: Iowa
Registered: Aug 2009


 - posted 09-21-2009 12:47 PM      Profile for Alex Edwards   Email Alex Edwards       Edit/Delete Post 
The way our theater is layed out, we have 2 long booths with 10 projectors each and then 2 projecters in their own rooms and then 2 more in the same room. For Harry Potter we used 5 prints and sold out the entire 20 auditorium theater. It did take 3 projectionists and our booth manager but it went off without a hitch. One projectionist stuck around booth until the end but that is common practice for our theater.
I guess one advantage we had was that we were able to start threading a couple hours in advance and check over all the threading multiple times.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 09-21-2009 01:00 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did 12 screen
interlock in Washington DC back in 1985. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 09-21-2009 02:23 PM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At a recent theater I worked at, the owners weren't too fond of interlocking due to the potential dangers (at least this is what I was told by management). I told the managers I could do it. The managers told the owners and they gave the OK on a Bollywood rental which scored us $400 more and some more concession sales (which is the price we rented out auditoriums on a Saturday night, though I think we gave that particular customer a deal in pricing). We did a bunch more interlocks in the following months, me doing all of them. No one from downstairs was very interested in seeing it run. The machines were not wired for interlock. I was even able to manage a 6-way interlock in the same theater, though not for an audience.

The first movie I ever interlocked was The Lion King and had no issues with that (and I had just learned to thread not long before). Then it was 101 Dalmatians with Glen Close. Again, no problems. I had to teach the other projectionists how to interlock with a short test reel using our 3 small auditoriums. Then there was Lost World which I did have an issue. It was running fine and then later in the evening when I went to close down the projectors, I noticed the tail end of the film was still threaded through both projectors and a bit tangled in the brain. Both projectors had shut down properly, no burnt film, no complaints from anyone in both the sold out theaters. Weird.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Slycord
Film God

Posts: 2986
From: 퍼항시, 경상푹도, South Korea
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 09-21-2009 03:22 PM      Profile for Chris Slycord   Email Chris Slycord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Most I've done is 4 on opening weekend for Transformers 2. Had to call my booth manager to get the setup code so I could change one of the automation's loop number, otherwise it would've been run manually. Apparently, he didn't realize I was doing that many theaters and was surprised to find the gigantic thing of leader I had used when he came in the next day.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 09-21-2009 03:29 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Where I used to work once a year we had to show cartoons for children. 11 screen, 3 or 4 interlocks simultaneously. From 2 to 4 auditoriums together, 10m delay between each show.

As Brad said, if you know what you are doing, it's not so scaring. First year, with newbie projectionists, was a bit hard. Then was really easy.

Marco

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 09-21-2009 06:49 PM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Scott Norwood
I've also seen schedules where the manager threads and starts the first shows of the day and the operator comes in about half an hour before the first shows end to run the rest of the day's shows. Again, it's not an ideal situation, but it's what the major chains seem to want.
Those are usually the days when I come in to find three of the prints are scratching.

In the case of the Return of the King show, I would NOT have left. That booth has notorious static problems... which are amplified when interlocking and the film is traveling through the air... and amplified even more with Fuji film for some reason... which is what ROTK was. Not to mention it was a new print, and it was three hours long. About 1/2 way through the film static brought a few extra loops of film into the brain and that was that. They should have been film-guarding that thing every round to help the static and babysitting it to get a feel for how much it was being impacted by static. They weren't.

Not only do you have to know what you're doing with interlocking, but in that case it would have helped them to know a few other things too.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Althaus
Master Film Handler

Posts: 435
From: Bedford, TX
Registered: Dec 2008


 - posted 09-21-2009 08:21 PM      Profile for Jonathan Althaus   Email Jonathan Althaus   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We havent done any public interlocking since we stopped running kid shows a few summers ago. I did run a 4 screen interlock this past spring just to show new projectionists what an interlock is and how its done. Our theatre just isn't set up for major interlocking.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.