my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Direct Drive vs. Standard Drive?

Author Topic: Direct Drive vs. Standard Drive? Carey Barber Expert Film Handler Posts: 143 From: Newport News, VA, USA Registered: Jan 2003 posted 09-11-2009 12:50 PM                     I have searched through the forums trying to find some info on the distinction between direct drive and standard drive projectors. I got some sense of what this means, but could somebody give me a straightforward description of the difference between these two? What exactly does it mean when we say that a projector is either direct drive or standard drive? I also got the sense from other threads that some prefer one system over the other. Please enlighten me as to what you prefer and why. Thanks!  |  IP: Logged David Zylstra Master Film Handler Posts: 432 From: Novi, MI, USA Registered: Mar 2007 posted 09-11-2009 02:55 PM                     For Century have a look at the R3-E soundhead manual (not the mag one) in the manuals section - page 17 shows the direct drive configuration where the motor drives the projector direcly and a shaft drops down to drive the soundhead sprocket. Page 38 shows the standard drive where the motor drives the soundhead sprocket shaft and a secondary belt off the same shaft drives the projector. All the ones I ran or dealt with were standard drive so I have no perspective on preference.  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 09-11-2009 10:30 PM                       I always liked direct-drive, for simplicity and ease of service. Standard drive, however, is a little better on optical sound flutter, because the large drive pulley acts as a flywheel.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 09-12-2009 06:39 AM                        While Tim is theoretically right about the flywheel effect of the large pulley, later ones were aluminum and minimized that effect. We measured wow & flutter on about 30 Century soundheads and found that the direct drive preserved the positive effects of the Davis bridge, while the standard drive upset the bridge. Main culprit is the tensioning roller that runs on the back side of the BE-529 belt. Unfortunately there is a lump on the BACK of the belt that introduces acceleraion & deceleration on the projector head. Therefore, for critical applications, the direct drive "wins." (Both are way better than the sh1000/mi9030 due to offcenter gears on those.) Louis  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 09-12-2009 07:24 AM                     the older chain drive machines didn't have that lump on the back of the belt I have found that the direct drive machines tended to shew up the main drive gear quicker possibly because of the ration of speed reduction it had to do  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 09-12-2009 09:08 AM                       quote: Louis Bornwasser We measured wow & flutter on about 30 Century soundheads and found that the direct drive preserved the positive effects of the Davis bridge, while the standard drive upset the bridge. Well, this is good to know, since I really like direct-drives. quote: Gordon McLeod I have found that the direct drive machines tended to shew up the main drive gear quicker I thought that was just because I had more direct-drive machines! Fortunately, the 328 gear slips right through the bearing mount while on the drive shaft.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 09-12-2009 10:44 AM                     The other problem with the standard drive machine is belt plucking as the gear belt engages and disengages the pulley. Heck, that alone has been the bane of Christie's design. Century has also had problems in their machining...the bores for the bearings are not always concentric and often have too much slop in the bearing retainers. The lack of concentric bores will cause shaft binding and the slop can indeed cause the drum to not turn true. The flex shafts for the direct drive have also been an issue for Century over the years...the rubber couplings eventually drink enough oil to swell up and fail. The spring shafts get deformed and fail...I haven't had as much problem with the current helical design though. Note, any slop in the flex shaft comes off of soundhead stability too. I would say that the standard drive would have some issues from loading due to the fact that the main drive gear now has to power the soundhead and possibly a lower reel. However, its gearing (Ratio) is probably a bit more in its favor than the standard drive. Steve  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 09-12-2009 11:01 AM                     quote: Louis Bornwasser We measured wow & flutter on about 30 Century soundheads and found that the direct drive preserved the positive effects of the Davis bridge, while the standard drive upset the bridge. Then something is seriously wrong with the drive if the Davis can't compensate for it. There were also alot of tolerance issues with the Davis parts in many Century reproducers over the years. Too bad that Strong did not adapt the round tooth belt drive to the Century as they did to the 5 Star as it would have been the best of all of them. Mark  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 09-12-2009 11:30 AM                     Actually, they did...the current strong belt is a fine pitched round tooth. Steve  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 09-12-2009 11:40 AM                     Yea, but is the pulley alumnium or steel?  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.