my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Silent Movie Right after G. I. Joe

Author Topic: Silent Movie Right after G. I. Joe Ralph Martin Film Handler Posts: 30 From: Vacaville, Ca./ USA Registered: Jul 2008 posted 08-09-2009 01:26 AM                     Hi All, Some may remember me - I’m the music director of Vacaville Christian High School. Last year you all were a huge help in providing me with advice about screening the silent movie, Wings right before Batman: The Dark Knight in a 16-plex theater with a live orchestra. Since I was asked by so many nice people on this forum to check in from time to time I thought I would let you know what’s happening. This Tuesday and Wednesday, August 12 and 13 we are screening another silent film in the same theater. This time it’s Lotte Reiniger’s Prince Achmed. It’s the first known surviving full-length animated feature and was done in silhouette with tinted frames. I got the 35mm print from Milestone Films (very nice people) and got hold of the original score from its release premier in 1926! It’s a beautiful, clean print and I’m excited about presenting it in a modern theater. We follow the new G.I. Joe movie on the same screen :-) The musical score was in terrible shape as it had to be completely re-edited for synchronization but thanks to you screening the actual print will not be a problem. I kept the aperture plate and lens from last year’s Wings screening. Well thanks again. For those who are interested - I’ll let you know how it goes :-) Ralph  |  IP: Logged Robert E. Allen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1078 From: Checotah, Oklahoma Registered: Jul 2002 posted 08-09-2009 03:53 AM                     I didn't see your posts last year Ralph. But just out of curiosity have these prints been modified with extra frames or does the projector in that auditorium have a variable speed motor to normalize the action on the screen? I'd been interested in knowing how it goes.  |  IP: Logged Kenneth Wuepper Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1026 From: Saginaw, MI, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 08-09-2009 06:46 AM                     Hello Ralph, Welcome back and thanks for your report and update. I had a class in animation with Lotte Reiniger in the mid 1950s. She was very feeble at that time but shared her techniques with us. We each made a 5 minute short and the results were shown at the end of our class along with her "Prince Achmed" film. The technique is to cut figures of flat sheet lead and then join them with brads like used to keep paper sheets together. The process is very time consuming as each frame is photographed individually and all of the figures are moved slightly between each frame. Her work is very precise and on screen it looks much like an Oriental shadow play. Great work it is that you are doing. Best wishes for continued success. KEN  |  IP: Logged Martin McCaffery Film God Posts: 2481 From: Montgomery, AL Registered: Jun 99 posted 08-09-2009 10:26 AM                        I'd just like to add that if everyone in the biz was as nice as Dennis and Amy at Milestone, it would be a whole lot better world for film.  |  IP: Logged John Hawkinson Film God Posts: 2273 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 08-09-2009 05:30 PM                     Here's a link to Ralph's post from last year about Wings. --jhawk  |  IP: Logged Stephen Furley Film God Posts: 3059 From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England Registered: May 2002 posted 08-09-2009 05:49 PM                     quote: Kenneth Wuepper I had a class in animation with Lotte Reiniger in the mid 1950s. She was very feeble at that time but shared her techniques with us. We each made a 5 minute short and the results were shown at the end of our class along with her "Prince Achmed" film. I've got a 35mm print of one of her films, though the first few seconds are missing. Along with all the other remaining films in my collection it will be going soon. Most has already gone during the last few years; I've only got about 30 shorts left on 16 and 35mm.  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 08-09-2009 08:24 PM                     quote: Ralph Martin it’s Lotte Reiniger’s "Prince Achmed" (on a side note: one should find the DVD of this movie, either by NetFlix or store rental .. quite an interesting film...) -Monte  |  IP: Logged Stephen Furley Film God Posts: 3059 From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England Registered: May 2002 posted 08-10-2009 08:12 AM                     Ralph, How many shows did you do for last year's film, and how many people did you get in? Since you say a plate had to be cut I asume that this is a venue which doesn't normally show silent film.  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 08-10-2009 09:27 AM                     I ran a print of "Prince Achmed" with a live orchestera at at an event last year. (probably the same print) I'd only seen short clips of the movie it on the "Arts" channel, and had always wanted to see the whole thing. I'm glad I finally got the opportunity, even with having to deal with doing change-overs, etc. .. It's quite a movie and I'm still in awe of what she was able to do with animated flat paper cut-outs. The fine details in character and the fluidness of animation must have taken great effort & planning to achieve. It's truly a unique, rare work of film art. It's a shame this film isn't better known.  |  IP: Logged Kenneth Wuepper Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1026 From: Saginaw, MI, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 08-10-2009 11:20 AM                     Jim, The figures are made of sheet lead. That way they are easier to control under the camera. Paper would drift about on the animation stand and make the motion very unpredictable. KEN  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 08-11-2009 10:36 AM                     Thanks, Ken. Using fine lead sheets makes a lot more sense than paper. But it makes me even more impressed at the fine details she was able to achieve, such as the lace in the Prince's garments and in the trees, and buildings, etc.  |  IP: Logged Ralph Martin Film Handler Posts: 30 From: Vacaville, Ca./ USA Registered: Jul 2008 posted 08-13-2009 03:04 AM                     Hello all, Thanks for all the well-wishes :-) We just had our first of two performances. We sold the house (321 tickets). Thursday is the second and final performance. Here is our local paper’s article. The picture is from the run-through rehearsal with the print at the movie theater. I like the picture but the house light were on so the screen looks dark. The actual presentation is much brighter and no obstruction from the orchestra save a small soft glow from the stand lights that actually gives it a Fantasia-Like look. http://www.thereporter.com/news/ci_13043451 Robert: This is a modern 16-plex theater. I had to file an aperture plate and purchase a lens for the full-frame film for last year’s screening of Wings. All is at 24 frames per second and the print is plattered – with permission from Milestone. I was afraid that the film would run too fast as I had heard that maybe the movie should be run at 22fps. But the speed was just fine – the same as the milestone dvd. I don’t know if it was adjusted to run at 24fps but I doubt it. Stephen: We did two performances last year with great results I don’t recall the numbers but they were very good. Last nights screening was a no-more-tickets-to-sell night. If I recall I think it happened at Wings as well. The community really gets behind stuff like this. This is our 3rd silent movie. the first one was Metropolis. That one was a sond academy 35mm print from Kino (also very nice people), We just turned off the soundtrack.  |  IP: Logged Robert E. Allen Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1078 From: Checotah, Oklahoma Registered: Jul 2002 posted 08-14-2009 03:36 AM                     Hi Ralph: If the screen action was normal and the machine was running at 24fps then the distributor had frames added, probably when it was prepared for DVD, which slowed the original 18fps down. Thanks, you answered the question whether you knew it or not.  |  IP: Logged Ralph Martin Film Handler Posts: 30 From: Vacaville, Ca./ USA Registered: Jul 2008 posted 08-15-2009 01:27 PM                     Robert, you're probably right - especially if it was made to run at 18fps (I had heard 22fps). The music was spot-on in terms of speed. Any faster and the musical score wouldn't have made any sense.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.