Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Silver screens (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Silver screens
Ron Curran
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 504
From: Springwood NSW Australia
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 05-24-2009 08:12 PM      Profile for Ron Curran   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Curran   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is a silver screen (required for certain 3D systems) similar to the Miracle Mirror Screen that was introduced with CinemaScope?

Also, I seem to remember, when I was a kid, that movies were referred to as the Silver Screen; were any screens silver in the 40s?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-24-2009 08:17 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think it was a lenticuluar screen surface. Silver was only used for 3-D even back then. The CS lenses ate up alot of light and they needed alot of gain back then.
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Ron Curran
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 504
From: Springwood NSW Australia
Registered: Feb 2006


 - posted 05-24-2009 09:54 PM      Profile for Ron Curran   Author's Homepage   Email Ron Curran   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks Mark (don't you ever sleep?).
We actually had a Miracle Mirror but I can't remember it being lectilinear.
It had to be replaced when the local theatre group destroyed it - served us right for having a framed screen. We then had to resort to a roll-up screen which had to be flat white.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 05-25-2009 01:06 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
After reading the similar topic in the WideScreenMuseum site:

Wouldn't this type of screen surface be like the old "glass beaded" rollup tripod screens that home projectors used?

 |  IP: Logged

Damien Taylor
Master Film Handler

Posts: 493
From: Perth, Western Australia
Registered: Apr 2007


 - posted 05-25-2009 01:20 AM      Profile for Damien Taylor   Email Damien Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We still have our silver screen. When the theater was tripled in the 80's, All the screen and rigging was brought forward,and the proscenium recreated at the balcony edge. I'm guessing it was from 3D the first time around. But there is definite dark spots, and side visibility is shocking, it has poor gain, and is nearly impossible to clean. But we'll be ready for 3D again [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 05-25-2009 03:57 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This page from the Widescreen Museum:

web page

which seems to be taken from original material published at the time says that they are

'not simply sheets of fabric sprayed with aluminum or other reflecting materials, but they have been embossed with tiny elements, each one of which is so shaped as to reflect light toward the seats in a theatre and to keep it out of waste spaces.'

Of course, 'Not simply' does not mean that they were not silver. However, further down the page it says that these screens are suitable for 3-D. It doesn't say what type of 3-D, but for film, at that time, two strip polarised was the norm, so this seems to indicate that the screens were silver, in addition to the 'millions of tiny "lenses"'. I do remember on an old one which I saw that the joins in the screen showed up badly, and the surface was also badly marked, but it would have been about fifteen years old at the time.

Interesting that it says this:

'20th Century-Fox CinemaScope attractions are available to any exhibitor who can provide a satisfactory projection on whatever screen used.'

I though that the Miracle Mirror, along with the stereophonic sound system was mandatory for Cinemascope. There's no date on this page, maybe it was mandatory at first, but Fox later dropped this requirement, even before they dropped the requirement for stereophonic sound.

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 05-25-2009 08:22 AM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is being described is what is commonly known as "lenticular" in these situations.

Instead of spray-painting aluminum flakes onto a flat matte white surface to make it "silver", a pattern is embossed into either the substrate or the actual surface.

The silver surface is generally very reflective, and thus offers too much gain to the front, meaning too little (negative) gain to the sides.

The pattern that makes sense to help with this problem is a lenticular one, where the surface is shapped like little (thin) waves running vertically. We don't care about the lack of angle of view vertically, only horizontally, as nobody is looking at the screen from above and the height is usually small compared to the width.

This helps spread light more evenly horizontally across the surface of the screen, helping a bit with the hotspot, the dark corners and the small angle of view. More help can be obtained by curving the screen a bit as well.

Some of the current silver screens are also manufactured of a lenticular kind.

Traditionally, all 3D systems in use in cinema required a silver screen. Exceptions are, of course, the very seldom used Anaglyph systems (i.e. color red/blue glasses) and, much more recently, active glasses systems (some Imax Solido and XpanD) and Dolby (Infitec).

Silver screens were also used for non-3D applications in theaters that wanted to boost the (apparent) light output thanks to the enormous gain they offered. Since the first anamorphic lenses probably sucked up a bit of light, I can see an use in those situations as well.

Due to the reflectivity and inherent color spectrum etc, images usually look very contrasty and saturated (except in the corners if the screen is large, lol), so those could be desirable features to some as well. I'm not going to point out the "not so desirable" features of silver screens .... lenticular or not ... curved or not ...

But for 3D, they were almost mandatory for the longest time. Still are.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 05-25-2009 09:17 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeh . . . . and when old they are hardly silver. More like dull grey. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Julio Roberto
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 938
From: Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Registered: Oct 2008


 - posted 05-25-2009 09:54 AM      Profile for Julio Roberto     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yeah, they are traditionally a bitch when it comes to aging. They can't really be efectively cleaned. Heck, most shouldn't even been touched. So cross your fingers you don't get stains on them. Some you can clean carefully with a dry cloth. Some can be better cleaned, but those are usually the kind that suck for 3D to begin with ...

Not all silver screens are created equal ...

You can expect them to last about 15 years max before a "mandatory" replacement is in order for 3D applications. If your theatre cares about true presentation quality. Otherwise, you can keep them for 135 years [Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-25-2009 10:03 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There were still a few hanging in the Midwest area in larger theaters that had the tags on them. They were all lenticuluar surfaces. The few locations that did silver for the 80's 3-D re-hash had them painted silver.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Dennis Udovich
Film Handler

Posts: 71
From: Sheboygan, WI, USA
Registered: Dec 2001


 - posted 05-28-2009 02:48 PM      Profile for Dennis Udovich   Author's Homepage   Email Dennis Udovich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If you are using the REAL D 3-D system, then you need a silver screen. Real D does not require the battery glasses required with the other systems. You get disposable glasses. The system works fine, with no need to retrieve the glasses after each show, or cleaning of the glasses. Marcus Theatres has added and/or switched 3D systems to Real D as of tomorrow for UP.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-28-2009 06:12 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Miracle Mirror screens were a aluminized (silver) lenticular screen (cloth backed)that was very good on curved frames
Does any one remember the Protolite lensed high gain screens from a few years ago

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 05-29-2009 06:21 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No one manufactures a screen like the lenticular silver Miracle Mirror that was manufactured for Fox for CinemaScope. THAT screen would be ideal for today's conundrum of needing a screen with good characteristics for both 3D and 2D. The non-lenticular silver screens that are used now have all the negatives that silvers are known for when showing standard 2D -- the hotspotting, sometimes severe hotspotting depending on throw and width. Lenticular silvers are the best of both worlds -- they eliminate or at least reduce the hotspotting characteristic of standard silver screens making them well suited for 2D and they maintain polarization do they are good for 3D as well. So how come no one is making them?

I asked a rep at MDI that same question and he said one of the difficulties is that they are not easy to make with a high "unacceptable" rate off the line (funny, they were able to do it for CinemaScope way back in the 50s). He also said that MDI was about to launch a new lenticular silver screen surface. He boasted that the hotspot would be a thing of the past with their product. I don't know if that ever came to pass (I think MDI was bought out or merged or something) and even if they did make such a surface, the question still remains whether or not it really did deal better with hotspotting than conventional silver screens.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 05-29-2009 09:05 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What ever one does if any silver screens are purchased in the near future stay away from the Hurley "washable" silver surface. Its absolute crap and Hurley doesn't stand behind their product any longer!

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 05-29-2009 07:01 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark; note on the Hurley invoice that they don't warrant anything. . . . not even that a screen is a screen. Louis

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.