Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » dolby CP65 question, new to this

   
Author Topic: dolby CP65 question, new to this
Bradley Johnson
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Newport, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 02-26-2009 07:18 PM      Profile for Bradley Johnson   Email Bradley Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry guys,,,,,I am a newbie in this field so go easy on me.

I live in a very small town in Wa state and we are lucky enough to have a very old but great cinema here. It recently was sold by the original owners (it was built in 1952). The new owner came to me to help upgrade the sound system from the original mono amp and single speaker cabinet. I am a live audio engineer by trade and was the only one around with any audio related experience. The cinema is on a very slim budget and I have donated my time. I have completely installed a left center right setup with sub and surround speakers. At the moment we are still using the original setup,,,my question is based on the Dolby CP65. I bought one on line and noticed that it did not come with the cat 350 cards. Will it still function? Should I be looking for a pair of said cards and if so, is there a modification that needs to be done, or can I just put them in the slots? The unit is not marked as a 65A. One other question is on the projector end of things. The readers are Kelmars and have no other label or id that I can find. My question here is being that the original system was mono, will these need to be upgraded?



Thanks!

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-26-2009 08:07 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The readers need to be changed to red light so a reverse scan is a must recomend BACP or the CE ones
What noise reduction card is installed
If there is a catt222 then the unit will run just fine in a type mode
if it is a cat 222SR/A then it is ready to go for A and SR

 |  IP: Logged

Bradley Johnson
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Newport, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 02-26-2009 08:10 PM      Profile for Bradley Johnson   Email Bradley Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It has a cat 222SR/A.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-26-2009 09:59 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The CP-65's that have the CAT 350's are definately the preferable ones to have though. The 222 SR/A is not really true SR by any means. It's more of an emulator like Smart's cards were but it is better then the Smart cards.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Bradley Johnson
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Newport, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 02-26-2009 10:36 PM      Profile for Bradley Johnson   Email Bradley Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is it safe to say that if you have a CP65 with the 222 SR/A card and no 350 cards, that you are stuck with it as is? Is it possible to put the cat-350 cards into the unit I have?

Thanks!

Brad

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-26-2009 10:56 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, you can add the cat. 350s (or cat. 300s) and it will use those for SR and the 222 SR/A for A decoding. They show up on Ebay all the time, usually as part of a 363 noise-reduction unit. You can throw away (or re-sell) the 363 frame and use the cards in the CP65. Unless you are running 70mm magnetic, either the cat. 300s or 350s will work fine.

It's a worthwhile upgrade if you are playing newer films (generally anything made since the mid-1990s will have an SR track).

If you don't already have a spare preamp card (cat. 240A), you might consider getting one of those as well.

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 02-27-2009 01:14 AM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Bradley, check the Equipment for Sale listings here, I have some CAT 350's for sale at a screamin deal price... [Smile]

(I hope this post isn't against the rules though.. )

A cautionary note: Please post the serial number of your CP-65 (it's found on a small metal tag on the backplane, or a sticker on one of the rear side ears on later models.)

Certain early CP-65's require a daughterboard to use the 300/350 cards. (I think the CP-65 manual on this site tells which s/n's this affects.)

 |  IP: Logged

Bradley Johnson
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Newport, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 02-27-2009 01:08 PM      Profile for Bradley Johnson   Email Bradley Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Tony,
Thanks for the tip, I checked your FS add and it said the 350s were sold.....That brings up my next question...Whats the difference between a SR350 and a SR300 card? As your add said that you still had some SR300s available. Seems like I saw something along the lines that the 300s were for a 70MM set up???

thanks for the help!

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-27-2009 01:23 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The cat. 350s only have SR circuits. The cat. 300s also have A-type circuits. In a CP65, there is no benefit to using cat. 300s unless you are running 70mm magnetic sound (in which case you need an external magnetic preamp). Either will work fine for an optical setup, but the 300s are usually more expensive than the 350s. You still need the 222 or 222 SR/A for optical A-type decoding and to set Dolby levels.

There is also a cat. 450, which is an A-type circuit for the 363 NR box, but is not really useful (as far as I know) in a cinema context.

 |  IP: Logged

Bradley Johnson
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Newport, WA, USA
Registered: Feb 2009


 - posted 02-27-2009 06:43 PM      Profile for Bradley Johnson   Email Bradley Johnson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This brings me to yet another question that has been nagging me since this project started and that is: Do all current films have an optical soundtrack? I guess what I am asking is that if I have a good reader and a Dolby CP65 can I get good results on all current films? This of course omits a digital platform as the owner is not ready financially on that front. I would really love to see what a modern system looks like as I am learning on truly ancient gear.

 |  IP: Logged

Marco Giustini
Film God

Posts: 2713
From: Reading, UK
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 02-27-2009 07:15 PM      Profile for Marco Giustini   Email Marco Giustini   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bradley Johnson
Do all current films have an optical soundtrack?
Yes, SR type.
You can have good results from a good analog sound system. Just remember that

1. It will not sound as a digital one
2. Analog soundtracks are automatically generated by the digital one and - at least here - it's considered a backup soundrack so there aren't much quality controls on it

Marco

 |  IP: Logged

Tony Bandiera Jr
Film God

Posts: 3067
From: Moreland Idaho
Registered: Apr 2004


 - posted 02-27-2009 09:14 PM      Profile for Tony Bandiera Jr   Email Tony Bandiera Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As Marco has said, yes all current films have optical tracks..but two minor notes:

Not ALL films are done in Digital so the optical track MIGHT be only Dolby A (depends a lot on country of origin, some art/foreign films have Dolby A-type tracks) but he is right the vast majority, even without digital tracks will be optical SR.

As for the idea of the optical being a backup only and not subject to QC, I'd say that's not necessarily true in all cases, but it is derived from the digital masters and it is possible that it isn't qc'd as well as it should be, but so far, most prints I've run across with bad optical tracks have tended to have other problems with the picture portion and sometimes the digital tracks too.

To expand on Marco's first point, he means that the optical track will have three key differences, in order of most noticeable to least noticeable..: The surrounds will be only one channel, not separate left/right; the dynamic range will be lower; and there will still be noticeable bits of noise from dirt and splices.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.