Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » SDDS film prints in Europe

   
Author Topic: SDDS film prints in Europe
Allan Riddelll
Film Handler

Posts: 33
From: msida , malta, europe
Registered: Jan 2009


 - posted 01-21-2009 06:37 PM      Profile for Allan Riddelll   Email Allan Riddelll   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Out here in Malta we have 6 DFP3000 processors in our 6 screens - 2 with SRD backup. The general scenario being that SDDS was chosen as, at the time (2000), it was considered the premiere digital format offering at best the 8 channel configuration when utilised. So far so good. SDDS at its best, in my opinion, is head and shoulders above SRD or DTS (and incidentally i am not an employee of any of them). So, as Shakespeare would say, here's the rub:
Over the 8 years since our opening the standard of SDDS prints have deteriorated rapidly and by that i mean prints from both Technicolor and Deluxe London. Am not talking about used prints either. You can be sure that when u check the cans and u see SR/SRD/DTS/SDDS you can think again. What a major misnomer. Tracks labeled SDDS without SDDS - tracks not labeled SDDS but complete with SDDS and multiple dropouts. I have 8 years of film reports and a good percentage cite high dropout rates (pc based error rates confirm this). Here's my most recent one:
Madagascar 2 - reel one SDDS - drop out just after start reel 2 and remainder. reel 3 goes into SDDS after a few minutes then couple of d/o for remainder. Reels 4 and 5 not SDDS.
Then comes a brief respite when we occasionally receive used prints from the States (recent titles being Lakeview Terrace, The Express and, i think, Beverly Hills Chihuahua) - and guess what ? All SDDS tracks are immaculate and play like a dream. You can bet that any prints with a USA prefix will be trouble free.
It should be mentioned that the Sony technicians who have been here to service our equipment have been more than efficient and helpful and indeed have been trying to address the problem.
But quite simply put, if the labs across the pond can get it right, why do we have to put up with this crap.
The final note being that yes, i,ll get comments about SDDS supposedly being on the way out but thats not on. Many thousands of exhibitors invested in this equipment and we here in Europe are being treated to a Russian Roulette state of affairs. Yes there is no domestic equivalent but , to be fair, SRD can be just as guilty.
Cloverfield, incidentally, was a crud of a movie, but it has the best SDDS track i have ever heard.

Change of subject - 2 movies - Let the Good Times Roll (1974) and Snow Job (1971 and retitled Ski Raiders in UK) . Any of u guys have it on DVD ?

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 01-21-2009 07:28 PM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SDDS, in the States, is just about as bad. Sony does not fully support the equipment and prints are becoming harder and harder to find. Some releases haveno sdds at all on any print.

I would reconsider SRD. Printing quality is significantly more robust and, compared to the master, the analog and digital playback is unequaled. If it isn't it is a setup error at the cinema. Sony "processes" the audio and it has never been a "mirror image."

BTW: Technicolor London has an excellent reputation for quality, perhaps ever better than US Tech. I would,however, believe that sdds quality control is not high on any printers list of worries. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-21-2009 08:53 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not that they don't sound good when they work [thumbsup] but
SDDS is now really a dead horse... we have the units(good and bad)stacked like chordwood in one of our store rooms. Also, since film is also not far behind in the obsolete department perhaps its time to consider starting the conversion to digital.
What ever ya decide to do just don't fully rely on those SDDS units any longer.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-21-2009 08:54 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So talk to the labs and let us know what they say! They *do* listen. They do answer their phones. They do answer email.

Technicolor London? I would have thought you'd get more prints from Technicolor Rome.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-22-2009 09:07 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Those sites we have that have SDDS...have been tracking well...better, in fact, than when SDDS was still actively installing equipment.

So I believe you when you say that your USA prints track well...all of the ones I've seen recently have tracked as well or better than the other Digital offerings.

Whereas you say your techs have tried to address any equipment issues and the good tracking on imported prints proves this, your only recourse is to complain to the labs and demand superior quality. You can also see if Sony can assist you on this.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Cassedy
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1661
From: San Francisco, CA
Registered: Dec 2006


 - posted 01-22-2009 09:39 AM      Profile for Jim Cassedy   Email Jim Cassedy   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
WoW! You actually have Sony TECHS??? [Big Grin]

Last year I assisted a small theater chain here in pulling out a whole bunch of SDDS systems, which were replaced with
a mixture of Dolby Digital or DTS systems depending on the venue and how much money they had to spend.

The owner of the SDDS systems knew I had my own projection set-up at home and offered me one of the systems for free.

But I didn't take it.

(That news would make some of my close friends faint,
since I have a reputation of being quite a "pack-rat".)

 |  IP: Logged

Blaine Young
Master Film Handler

Posts: 477
From: Kirkland, WA, USA
Registered: Sep 2006


 - posted 01-22-2009 12:11 PM      Profile for Blaine Young   Email Blaine Young   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Louis Bornwasser
SDDS, in the States, is just about as bad. Sony does not fully support the equipment and prints are becoming harder and harder to find. Some releases haveno sdds at all on any print.
Aside from Focus Features (which never have an SDDS track), an occasional Fox title (The Sentinel) and handfuls of independent pictures ("Bottle Shock" & "Nobel Son"), SDDS tracks are present on nearly every title. We don't have any readers - so that doesn't do us any good.

I also find it interesting that some prints overseas do not have SDDS tracks, where the US versions do. I've seen prints of "Independence Day", "Star Trek" VII-X, "Star Wars" Episode IV & V, and "Titanic" all which didn't have SDDS tracks. Granted - these are a few years old...

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 01-22-2009 12:39 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This doesn't seem very surprising. In a word: AMC.

That is, there is a very large chain in the US that has a very large deployed SDDS base and the clout to require the studios continue to produce SDDS on their prints. I expect that internationally, there is neither such a loud voice nor as significan an installed base.

It's really too bad that 8-channel mixes have gone the way of the dodo. I was really hoping DTS would help bring it back with the XD10, and the XD10P, etc.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 01-22-2009 11:42 PM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SDDS Letter of Discontinuance

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 01-23-2009 02:37 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Only 8500 decoders; is that Worldwide? To be honest, I'm surprised that it lasted as long as it did? Does anybody have figures for Dolby and DTS?

 |  IP: Logged

Marin Zorica
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 671
From: Biograd na Moru, Croatia
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 01-23-2009 07:40 AM      Profile for Marin Zorica   Email Marin Zorica   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I installed a used DFP-D2000 in friend's cinema a year ago, on reader I did changed led's and align all, so from time to time till them when I hear from him I ask for SDDS, he says that 80% of prints have it and he do play in SDDS, and only few did drop out for a second on couple places during film.

O yes, if anybody is kind to give used unit I'm please to take it, as I hear there are numerous units dismounted?

 |  IP: Logged

Bastiaan Fleerkate
Film Handler

Posts: 85
From: Linschoten, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Registered: Jun 2006


 - posted 01-23-2009 03:58 PM      Profile for Bastiaan Fleerkate   Author's Homepage   Email Bastiaan Fleerkate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm also available for dumping any used (and new [Razz] )SDDS units [Big Grin]
There are 2 SDDS units in The Netherlands and they aren't in use, as far as I know...

Most mainstream films have SDDS here...

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.