Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » LeVezzi POSI-TROL sprockets L4CS31???

   
Author Topic: LeVezzi POSI-TROL sprockets L4CS31???
Steve Beverly
Film Handler

Posts: 83
From: El Paso, Tx.,
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 12-28-2008 10:56 PM      Profile for Steve Beverly   Email Steve Beverly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does anyone know what projector this fits:

LeVezzi POSI-TROL sprockets part number L4CS31 [uhoh]

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-29-2008 10:22 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ask the seller for dimensions, O.D, Bore, Etc, then we amy be able to help... thats not a currently made sprocket. I will also look in an old LaVezzi catalog and see if it's listed.

Updayte: They are holdback sprockets and have a 5/16 bore and a half inch counterbore at the end... not sure what projector they are for... These cannot be used on the intermittent.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-29-2008 12:25 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The L4CS31 will fit:

Simplex E7 lower feed
Century projector lower feed

According to the LaVezzi chart.

Now the L4CS31, being a holdback sprocket are no longer being made. There was a period of time where most projector manufacturers had different sprockets for holdback (check your Century, Simplex or even Noreleco manuals). The diameter of a holdback sprocket was slightly less (on the order of 7-mils for a 16-tooth sprocket).

Most, if not all projector manufacturers now use the same sprocket for both duties and the "feed" sprocket size is the one used. Thus, the L3CP31 can be used in place of the L4CS31 (though not really vice-versa).

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 12-29-2008 12:55 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When film stock was nitrate and life of a print was several years in the marketplace; the different diameter sprockets tolerated film shrinkage.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Beverly
Film Handler

Posts: 83
From: El Paso, Tx.,
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 12-29-2008 09:09 PM      Profile for Steve Beverly   Email Steve Beverly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
AH, just my luck. I was hoping they'd work on a Super (I want to go all Positrol). However, there's a guy selling 3 of these on 35mm Film Collector dot com for 25 bucks each new in the box, new old stock from 1960 which I though was a decent price though I could be wrong. They fit 5/16ths shafts to answer Mark's question.

Since they won't work on my SuperSimplex, maybe one of you E-7 or Century guys could use one or two of these. However for some unknown reason it won't allow me to post the link but I'm sure you can easily find it, it was posted there on the 26th. I don't know this guy so I don't know his reputation. I would, of course, therefore take any precautions you deem appropriate before buying which is just common sense. [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged

Jeremy Weigel
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1062
From: Edmond, OK, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 12-29-2008 10:43 PM      Profile for Jeremy Weigel   Email Jeremy Weigel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Same ones being sold here on the forums perhaps?

Link

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Beverly
Film Handler

Posts: 83
From: El Paso, Tx.,
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 12-30-2008 11:37 PM      Profile for Steve Beverly   Email Steve Beverly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yep, dat's da guy.

 |  IP: Logged

Christopher Seo
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 530
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-31-2008 12:42 PM      Profile for Christopher Seo   Email Christopher Seo   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve,

What's the reasoning behind a smaller diameter (would you say, 'tooth pitch'?) for the holdback sprocket only?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-31-2008 01:39 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I believe it put one more tooth in contact with the perfs and hence less strain on the film itself. With Estar this is less of a factor but if you've ever run old brittle acetate you then know what I mean. The downside of shorter pitch sprockets is that they wear out quite a bit faster. When I had the sprockets made for my VistaVision projector I had the pitch made just a tiny bit less than normal. This proved to me much easier on the film than a standard pitch sprocket would have been.... That custom 32 tooth VV intermittent sprocket is also a Positrol!!

There are several articles on the pitch of projector sprockets in International Projectionist Magazine a long time ago that explained the trade offs involved in sprocket diameter vs. noise vs. sprocketwear vs. film wear and so on. WIll have to dig and see if I still have those mags around...

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-31-2008 07:52 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think the diameter is enough different to get you an extra perf. Furthermore...even the AAII had a "holdback" sprocket...with 32-tooth, the diameter is so much larger, the odds of getting an extra perf are even more slim. I know I tried an NOS "H" sprocket and it sung to the high-heaven...regardless of take up tension...including when feeding an AW3 platter. So I'm not quite sure what the "benefit" of it was supposed to be.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Jurich
Master Film Handler

Posts: 305
From: Las Vegas USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 12-31-2008 07:55 PM      Profile for Edward Jurich   Email Edward Jurich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have the sprockets. I was given these in about 1960 from an operator because I assume they could no longer use them with mag prints that were coming to local houses. I thought being so old they might be useful for someone. Actually, I changed the post to will donate if you can use them for the cost of priority mail. I hate to just throw them out.

Here is what they look like

 -

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Beverly
Film Handler

Posts: 83
From: El Paso, Tx.,
Registered: Nov 2007


 - posted 01-01-2009 12:25 AM      Profile for Steve Beverly   Email Steve Beverly   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now I'm REALLY upset that they won't fit a Super [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Robert Throop
Master Film Handler

Posts: 412
From: Vernon, NY USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-01-2009 09:31 AM      Profile for Robert Throop   Email Robert Throop   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Edward Jurich
I was given these in about 1960
I didn't think the Positrol was introduced until the mid seventies about the same time as the VKF.
Bob

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-01-2009 10:07 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Steve Guttag
So I'm not quite sure what the "benefit" of it was supposed to be.

'
If you read my post I give you an idea of what they do... all the research in those articles in the old IP mags was done by Eastman Kodak.

quote: Robert Throop
I didn't think the Positrol was introduced until the mid seventies about the same time as the VKF.
Bob

I believe you are correct Robert. The wide Posi-Trol tooth uses many attributes from the VKF tooth.

 |  IP: Logged

Edward Jurich
Master Film Handler

Posts: 305
From: Las Vegas USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 01-01-2009 10:27 AM      Profile for Edward Jurich   Email Edward Jurich   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
UPDATE...it appears I found a home for these, hope they can be used. LaVezzi never got back to me, guess they are too busy for non-business e-mail.

I am 99.99% sure I got these sprockets from the Hiway theater in Chicago at the same time I got some used Brenkert sprockets from the operator. And that would have been either 1960 while I was in high school or after I got out of the Air Force. I was still visiting the operator at the Hiway when I got out of the Air Force so it could have been closer to 1965. That was a long time ago but for sure before 1969. But anyway, if the general opinion is these are useless I will toss them. I am trying to clear out 50 years of junk that somehow seems to have gotten out of hand [Big Grin]

Here is some information

LaVezzi - POSI-TROL SPROCKETS

LaVezzi - VKF SPROCKET

I filled out their contact form and asked when they first manfactured these. If they say 1975 I am going to wonder where I got them [Eek!]

Well, I got my response and it would appear I got these sprockets at a later date than I thought. I can not imagine where because I was out of contact with any theater in the 70's and I do not recall getting them in later years. Someone must have broken in and placed them in the box with the other sprockets [Big Grin]

Edward,

Sorry it took a while to respond to your inquiry, we were doing our inventory this week.
We made this part over 20 years ago and cannot find the drawing to get a particular date
for you. We believe it was the 70s or 80s.

Hope this helps,

Regards,
Carol Steen
LaVezzi Precision


[ 01-08-2009, 12:30 PM: Message edited by: Edward Jurich ]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.