my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » DTS reader gives rounded rather than square waveform

Author Topic: DTS reader gives rounded rather than square waveform Alex Rolfe Film Handler Posts: 37 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Mar 2003 posted 10-01-2008 09:39 AM                        We had problems with one print recently playing in DTS on one projector in our changeover setup, so we checked the output voltages. Both projectors read at 4V without film. The projector that played fine gave roughly square waves with rounded corners as you'd expect when running film. The other reader (the one that didn't read reliably) gave something that looked more like sine waves- smoother curves and far less square. There were flat parts in the wave at the peak and troughs, but they were shorter than we saw on the other projector and the transitions were much longer. There's no noticable horizontal play in the film as it goes around the drum on the reader. We also tried pushing laterally on the film as it entered the reader but that didn't change the output either. Any suggestions on what to check or try before we think about replacing the reader?  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-01-2008 10:03 AM                     I would try increasing the reel tension  |  IP: Logged Robert Minichino Master Film Handler Posts: 350 From: Haskell, NJ, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 10-01-2008 10:38 AM                        Sharp edges = high frequencies, so if you lose your sharp edges of the waveform that means you're losing high frequency response. The obvious cause would be the reader being out of focus. If, as Gordon suggested, the film tension is okay (this can affect the placement of the film track with respect to the lens) then you should replace the reader and have it realigned.  |  IP: Logged Tony Bandiera Jr Film God Posts: 3067 From: Moreland Idaho Registered: Apr 2004 posted 10-01-2008 02:37 PM                     I concur, but with the 'scope connected would first mark the lens on the reader (the big hex nut) and carefully turn it slowly while watching the waveform, till it sharpens up. If trying that doesn't help, then return the lens to the mark. I would guess it would take no more than 1/4 turn MAX to bring it back in. I don't think any harm can come of trying that, I don't think the DTS reader technology is exactly rocket science. But first I would also make sure the lens is clean, use a cotton swab and lens cleaner and gently clean it off. Any oil or other residue could affect the reading accuracy.  |  IP: Logged Randy Stankey Film God Posts: 6539 From: Erie, Pennsylvania Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-01-2008 05:27 PM                     quote: Tony Bandiera Jr But first I would also make sure the lens is clean... I second that motion! I was taught to always clean the lens first whenever working on any sound head be it analog, Dolby, Sony or DTS. It may seem silly thing to remind you of but it is often the silly things that trip us up the most. Besides, the first rule of troubleshooting is to always eliminate the simple things first.  |  IP: Logged John Hawkinson Film God Posts: 2273 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 03-21-2009 07:45 PM                     We should have posted what happened here! Sorry about that. Here's a view of the initial problem: The image on top is the malfunctioning reader. The one beneath is the good reader. I think we spent too much time on introspection about this problem (specifically the rise time), worrying about whether it was a slow photocell, dying LED, etc., etc. DTS engineering suggested it was a bad cell. But it turned out that adjusting the lateral alignment was all that was necessary to fix the slow rise time issue and get good performance out of this reader. I don't have quite as comparable scope captures (first capture is at 710mV/division, second is at 560mV/division), though: I'm not sure what the takeaway is. "Sometimes you have to adjust the lateral alignment," I guess. This was not a problem specific to a particular print, either. --jhawk  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-21-2009 08:28 PM                     Unless the incomming film comes in dead straight over it's operational life span you'll see some wear on one of the TCR drum's side flanges depending on which way the film was pushing. The added stability roller doesn't completely alleviate this problem. This wear will allow the film to ride over slightly and cause the mistracking and need for slight re-alignment. This is especially noticable if the print you receive also has it's TC track slightly off of it's normal position. When I dismantle TCRs to re-led them I always measure the width of the drum... many, many of them show at least some slight wear... it is just alumnium after all... Mark  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-21-2009 08:49 PM                     The reader bracket doesn't help matters either...they don't get their 90-degree bends at 90-degrees. The film almost has to skew when going in/out of the reader. The upside...it forces it to ride a flange and not weave...the down side...as Mark pointed out is that the roller wears. Steve  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.