my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » CP650 Software versions

Author Topic: CP650 Software versions John Walsh Film God Posts: 2490 From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way Registered: Oct 1999 posted 07-18-2008 01:37 PM                     I noticed that the Dolby software disk (Issue 9) has two different versions for the setup. One is v2.2.4.3 and the other is v2.3.0.2 What's the difference?  |  IP: Logged Jim Cassedy Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1661 From: San Francisco, CA Registered: Dec 2006 posted 07-20-2008 09:34 PM                     59 (Sorry, I couldn't resist )  |  IP: Logged John Walsh Film God Posts: 2490 From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way Registered: Oct 1999 posted 07-21-2008 08:23 AM                     Well, that's the best answer so far! I just didn't know why Dolby would include two different versions on the same install/setup disk.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 07-21-2008 08:51 AM                     It has been Dolby's policy (at least in the past) to keep the versions of both firmware and software that reached a plateau available. Among other things, this would ensure that the software will properly communicate with the firmware. Generally speaking, software people only seem to test latest with latest even though they are supposed to be backwards compatible. Features have come and gone as well...you may want a feature that is not supported in later versions (like Dolby-E...last supported on firmware 2.1.9.0 and its mating software). Furthermore, the latest software or firmware may be found to be buggy...it is nice that one can go back to the last known stable version. Steve  |  IP: Logged John Walsh Film God Posts: 2490 From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way Registered: Oct 1999 posted 07-21-2008 06:48 PM                     OK, cool, that makes sense .. thanks! The CP650 doesn't support 'E' anymore? Usually, manufacturers don't discontinue a feature .. they might not update it, but keep it. Not that I have ever used E, or have seen it used ... or for that matter, ever heard of anyone else using it, but I want it just *because*!  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 07-21-2008 09:08 PM                     Yeah, the horsepower needed for Dolby-E was reallocated to other areas. Dolby-E is a broadcast format, primarily and the fact you have not been around it shows how rare it is for cinemas. I, on the other hand, have been dealing with it for many years. By and large, those they are going to use it have DP572s, if broadcast, or DMA8(Plus) for cinema. I have used Dolby-E on a CP650 but it is normally a pain. The plan was that one would have to register for the feature and pay a hefty licensing fee (not cheap either). One had to pay their money and submit the MAC address to get this hideous unlock code (it is long). The CP650 would decode Dolby-E but you didn't really get much in the way of options. For Cinema, the DMA8 Plus is really the best solution...you can chose which group you want (there are 8-channels in Dolby-E but they can be cut up in many different ways). The DMA8 Plus can deal with all of the various frame rates, unlike the DP572. In fact, on the DP572, you need to provide it with a video-reference or it won't play...and at that point you have the audio only in the digital domain...you still need a D/A converter (or use the AES inputs in a CP650 or like processor). Since the Dolby-E capability had to be there for those that wanted it...it would consume available horsepower even though 99% of the people didn't need it. It makes more sense have a DMA8 Plus. Now, if the CP650 didn't need that unlock code (different for each CP650), then having the capability for the occasional one-off show would indeed be handy. Steve  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.