my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Soundhead added to silent projector

Author Topic: Soundhead added to silent projector Andres Briano Expert Film Handler Posts: 162 From: Buenos Aires, Argentina Registered: Jan 2008 posted 02-06-2008 11:02 AM                        Hello Community, I have embarked myself on a task I have never done before, and I´d like to hear your opinions as well as your advice. I am currently restoring an Ernemann III, and as you know, being from the late ´20s, that is a silent projector. Projectors with sound always have a sprocket located right after the soundhead, for reading stability purposes. My questions are: Is it possible to do without that sprocket? Obvious as it may sound, there is no easy way to "insert" a new sprocket on to the projector. Right now I´m looking into going from the soundhead straight down to the take up reel. This sounds shaky to say the least. Has anyone done something like this before? If so, what are your recommendations? Very thankfull (as always) Andrés  |  IP: Logged John Walsh Film God Posts: 2490 From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way Registered: Oct 1999 posted 02-06-2008 12:26 PM                     In the US, we would call that last sprocket on a sound projector, the ‘hold-back’ sprocket. As a practical matter, I would think you must have that sprocket, or something that takes it’s function, to read the analog sound. You could do without it if the sound system is digital, though.  |  IP: Logged Andres Briano Expert Film Handler Posts: 162 From: Buenos Aires, Argentina Registered: Jan 2008 posted 02-06-2008 12:35 PM                        Thank you John. I wasn´t familiar with the term "hold-back sprocket". Do you believe I can get away with having a sprocket like the one on Dolby´s CAT 700 readers? A non-driven one? Andrés  |  IP: Logged Bob Koch Expert Film Handler Posts: 183 From: williams ca Registered: Nov 2001 posted 02-06-2008 12:49 PM                     Get yourself a Western Electric 209 or 211 reproducer. It had no sprocket; coming off the intermittent sprocket into a film chute thence to a kinetic scanner and back into the projector using the holdback sprocket.  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 02-06-2008 02:07 PM                     Most European projectors of the period had the soundhead in a box to the rear of the existing projector with suitable guide rollers to feed film to the "sound box" and return the film to the projector lower sprocket. Bob Kochs' WE soundhead suggestion allowed this same type of transport but was designed to sit below the projector. Simplex SI projectors had the same concept. I have seen some of these older projectors with the sound box to the rear in a few cinemas in Avenida de Florida and in Mar del Plata  |  IP: Logged Christos Mitsakis Expert Film Handler Posts: 242 From: Ag.Paraskevi, ATHENS, GREECE Registered: Sep 1999 posted 02-06-2008 02:48 PM                     Andres, This is an Ernemann II head, prety much like your III. You can use any older european soundhead (Philips, actually any Klangfilm, siemens, Bauer) with similar design to this Zeiss Ikon for ernemann: The majority of them can be upgraded with a stereo cell and laser retrofit. Christos.  |  IP: Logged Dave Ritchie Film Handler Posts: 65 From: Thames, New Zealand Registered: Oct 2006 posted 02-06-2008 03:07 PM                     My Ernemann II has a front mounted soundhead, the film go's from the top of the bottom drive sprocket round the head then back onto the same sprocket Works well- I'm going to upgrade it soon to stereo cell and laser  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 02-06-2008 07:41 PM                     That is an Australian soundhead.....looks like the same "whiffle tree" dancer arms and sound drum set up a used by Eprad soundhead.  |  IP: Logged Andres Briano Expert Film Handler Posts: 162 From: Buenos Aires, Argentina Registered: Jan 2008 posted 02-07-2008 07:58 AM                        Hello again community and thanks for your pointers! Bob K: I have been surfing the net trying to find information on the WE soundheads you recomended with no luck. Do you know where I can find any literature on it? Richard F.: I´ll shoot you a personal message so we can pick up the conversation about your experience in Argentina! Christos: Thanks for taking the trouble of uploading the pics. They are very helpful. Is that EII yours? Dave: Thanks a lot! As usual! Andrés  |  IP: Logged Christos Mitsakis Expert Film Handler Posts: 242 From: Ag.Paraskevi, ATHENS, GREECE Registered: Sep 1999 posted 02-07-2008 08:21 AM                     No there are just rip-offs from German e-bay. My introduction to projection has been through an EII or EIII (I didn't care about models back then). I remember having a speed frame gauge like the one in Dave's photo and a classic klangfilm sound head. C.  |  IP: Logged Andres Briano Expert Film Handler Posts: 162 From: Buenos Aires, Argentina Registered: Jan 2008 posted 02-09-2008 03:18 PM                        Hey, guys! New doubt on same subject. Considering the fixed 21 frame offset between aperture and sound scanning, is that distance long enough for me to place the soundhead right underneath the projector? As opposed to "in" it? Thanks a bunch!  |  IP: Logged Dave Ritchie Film Handler Posts: 65 From: Thames, New Zealand Registered: Oct 2006 posted 02-20-2008 09:25 PM                     Andres It should be sweet mounting a soundhead under the EIII Here is a pic of a Walturdaw 5 head on a westrex standard soundhead, You might have to make a spacer between them but it shouldn't be to hard to work out.  |  IP: Logged Andres Briano Expert Film Handler Posts: 162 From: Buenos Aires, Argentina Registered: Jan 2008 posted 02-21-2008 08:16 AM                        Hey, Dave! Thanks! Your pic has proven that what I want is doable! Excellent. Do you happen to know if the soundhead in the pic has a driven sprocket inside of it? If so, I assume that it must be coupled via belt to the projector transmission. I am right? Take care, Andrés  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.