Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Deluxe using new digital cinema compression?

   
Author Topic: Deluxe using new digital cinema compression?
Jarryd Beard
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 229
From: Hellertown, PA
Registered: Jul 2004


 - posted 07-26-2007 02:58 PM      Profile for Jarryd Beard   Email Jarryd Beard   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've noticed a couple recent titles released by Deluxe that are significantly smaller in file size. For instance, Harry Potter and Hairspray were 61 GB and 51 GB respectively. I did not notice a decrease in image quality... like it may have been below the 2K standard. Anyone heard anything more about this?

 |  IP: Logged

Bastiaan Fleerkate
Film Handler

Posts: 85
From: Linschoten, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Registered: Jun 2006


 - posted 07-30-2007 07:52 AM      Profile for Bastiaan Fleerkate   Author's Homepage   Email Bastiaan Fleerkate   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe because HP is longer (in time) then Hairspray????

 |  IP: Logged

John Wilson
Film God

Posts: 5438
From: Sydney, Australia.
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 07-30-2007 08:40 AM      Profile for John Wilson   Email John Wilson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, they are indeed smaller than previous files of other similarly lengthed movies.

 |  IP: Logged

Jarryd Beard
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 229
From: Hellertown, PA
Registered: Jul 2004


 - posted 07-30-2007 11:41 AM      Profile for Jarryd Beard   Email Jarryd Beard   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To clarify, both titles in my first post seem to be of smaller file size. For instance, with Harry Potter running running 138 min, I would have expected the file size to be closer to 200 GB.

 |  IP: Logged

David Zylstra
Master Film Handler

Posts: 432
From: Novi, MI, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 07-30-2007 04:04 PM      Profile for David Zylstra   Email David Zylstra   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The files are definitely 2K - with the push to get things DCI compliant the studios would not take a step backward (a lot of the snafus I saw last year with digital were upgrade related due to studios insisting on certain DCI features being available for their new release before a full QC could be done) and all of the 2K projectors out there are most likely not set up to accept a lower resolution from the playback server without modifying the input settings on the projector.

I know there were many studio and lab people surprised at how far Harry Potter compressed. I think there are several factors that play into file size - amount of on-screen action, how many scenes were CGI painted with a limited colorset, amount of bright or dark scenes, flat or scope, scope encoded at 858X2048 resolution or encoded "full container" at 1080X2048 letterboxed, 2K or 4K, live action or cartoon, is the source truly XYZ colorspace or lower, how hot the soundtrack is, etc . . . .

 |  IP: Logged

Lyle Romer
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1400
From: Davie, FL, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 07-30-2007 07:54 PM      Profile for Lyle Romer   Email Lyle Romer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
there are several factors that play into file size - amount of on-screen action, how many scenes were CGI painted with a limited colorset, amount of bright or dark scenes, flat or scope,
The biggest factor is that they are probably using variable bit rate encoders. I'm sure some of the factors that you listed come into play in the final file size but "amount of on-screen action" is not one of them. The JPEG-2000 compression specified by DCI encodes each frame as if it was an independent still picture. It is completely motion independent.

 |  IP: Logged

David Zylstra
Master Film Handler

Posts: 432
From: Novi, MI, USA
Registered: Mar 2007


 - posted 08-01-2007 08:14 AM      Profile for David Zylstra   Email David Zylstra   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, you are right on the "on screen action", my bad, I was pulling knowledge from MPG encoding where action would affect file size . . . . . I probably should have said that films with more action scenes that are bright and full of explosions (aka Die Hard) could carry the need for more color and contrast information than a darker film.

 |  IP: Logged

David Graham Rose
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 187
From: Cambridge, UK
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 08-02-2007 08:37 AM      Profile for David Graham Rose   Email David Graham Rose   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Greetings All

HP5 was variable bit rate (VBR enc)encoded and thus has a much lower file size. Pirates 3 was not variable bit rate encoded and therefore was about 300Gb.

David

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.