my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » De-rating dimmer for halogen bulbs?

Author Topic: De-rating dimmer for halogen bulbs? Andy Frodsham Expert Film Handler Posts: 238 From: Stoke on Trent, Staffs, UK Registered: Nov 2006 posted 07-02-2007 03:22 PM                     We are in the process of installing a dual-channel electronic dimmer (Panalogic DM260) for use in our theatre. The unit will be used to supplement our existing houselight dimmer and will be used purely for 'dressing' our screen between shows. We are planning on using PAR 64 lanterns on the screen. I read somewhere that halogen bulbs present a particularly difficult load for dimmer circuits and when using these bulbs one should de-rate the dimmer by about 50% when calculating the maximum load! Is this also the case when using professional dimmers like the Panalogic? For your information, the DM260 should be able to support approximately 25 amps per channel!  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-02-2007 03:27 PM                     If they are not a transformer low voltage halogen then the loading to the dimmer is the same It is the general rule of derateing if transformer loads are connected  |  IP: Logged Andy Frodsham Expert Film Handler Posts: 238 From: Stoke on Trent, Staffs, UK Registered: Nov 2006 posted 07-02-2007 03:32 PM                     Gordon, all the bulbs are mains voltage (230 volts over here in the UK). Various electrician friends have told me that domestic (wall plate type) dimmers must be de-rated when driving halogen bulbs - even mains operated non-transformer types. Anyone know why? And would this need to be born in mind whe loading the Panalogic?  |  IP: Logged Robert Minichino Master Film Handler Posts: 350 From: Haskell, NJ, USA Registered: Dec 2005 posted 07-02-2007 03:45 PM                        I agree, no need to derate dimmers for mains/line voltage halogens; they're resistive loads just like ordinary incandescents. The cold current for halogens can be about twice that as incandescents, but well within the capability of an ordinary dimmer, mostly because it doesn't last as long.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 07-02-2007 06:00 PM                     In many residential applications, the halogen lamps are low-voltage lamps and as such there are transformers and such driving the lamp, thus the problem with the dimmer circuit. In your case, you are driving the lamp directly so there should not be any derating necessary.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-02-2007 06:18 PM                     The reason that transformer loads must be derated is that the current and voltage isn't in phase due to the inductance of the transformer and that will cause a issue with the dT/dV (delta time/deltavovoltage) rating of the power device It can also cause a dimmer to flicker depending on the coupling between the power device and the control circuit Dimmers that use an optocoupler with a snubbing network typically need a different value for the two resistors and cap that make up the output section of the optocircuit Ones that are pulse transformer drive typically are more tollerent  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-02-2007 10:00 PM                     Ah Gord.... Does a transformer exist where the current and voltage are perfectly in phase? I don't think so..... Mark  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 07-03-2007 06:03 AM                        Only if it is a non-inductive one! Louis  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-03-2007 03:10 PM                     All transformers exhibit phase distortion the one I was mentioning was a pulse transformer that drives the SCRs typically that driver design is based on a voltage controled oscillator driving a UJT compared to most opto coupled designs that are a dc comparator to a sawtooth wave  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-03-2007 04:18 PM                     Gord, Most really decent dimmers are all digital now. Kelmar's are an exception to that in the well made dimmer department, I think they are minus the pulse tranny too if memory serves me correctly. Most of the high end dimmers use Solid State Relays that are opto-coupled to the rack computers to actually handle the load... SCR's are for the most part obsolete as far as dimmers go. Mark  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-03-2007 06:02 PM                     Actually many high end dimmers still are dual SCR but in a encpsulated case like a SSR The most interesting is the use of IGB and FET devices in power dimming  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-03-2007 06:41 PM                     While electrically they may be drawn similar they just don't work like a pair of SCR's do. An IBGT is a fet of sorts... has a gate just like a fet does. Using an IGBT eliminates the need for an output inductor in smaller dimmers. They are mainly used in florescent dummer modules as they can be set to keep the filaments of a florescent lamps warm so you don't get the start up flashing that many standard dimmers have. This allows a wider fade range than normal. Mark  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 07-03-2007 07:12 PM                     Actually I know several dimmer makers that use an encapsulated dual SCR block and they are discrete SCRs in the block with seperate terminations and gates  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.