my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Digital Cinema is Overpriced

Author Topic: Digital Cinema is Overpriced Demetris Thoupis Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1240 From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus Registered: Apr 2001 posted 03-23-2007 01:05 AM                     How many of you believe that Digital Cinema projectors and servers are overpriced! Buying 1 Digital Projector and 1 Server might be the amount of equiping 4 Cinemas with Projectors and Lamphouses and maybe the main surround processor! I do not want to mention prices from companies for obvious reasons but I believe that the price for the time being is not applicable to small venues, only to large giants but at the end of the day, Is it worth it?  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 03-23-2007 03:02 AM                     ...all depends on the owner/buyer on what the final decision is, for that is a question that can't be answered directly. Maybe some small 'indie's' want to do digital and some just can't see the worth mentioned... Too much grey matter here....  |  IP: Logged Bastiaan Fleerkate Film Handler Posts: 85 From: Linschoten, Utrecht, The Netherlands Registered: Jun 2006 posted 03-23-2007 04:51 AM                        In The Netherlands there are a few companies that would lend you a projector and use it for a fixed price per month. CinemaNet (with the screwed up technical shoot out), XDC, and other smaller companies. Than it is also something that can be done with a lower budget. But hey....35mm Rules. (Look at the Interlock 101) Digital Cinema couldn't ever be that fun !  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-23-2007 05:41 AM                     So is gas, milk, food in general, and most other things in life. Mark  |  IP: Logged Stephen Furley Film God Posts: 3059 From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England Registered: May 2002 posted 03-23-2007 06:44 AM                     Given the very high development costs, and the small size of the potential market for such equipment the costs probably are 'justified' The question is whether the benefits of buying the equipment make the costs worth paying. For most cinemas. at the present time, I don't believe they do.  |  IP: Logged Bobby Henderson "Ask me about Trajan." Posts: 10973 From: Lawton, OK, USA Registered: Apr 2001 posted 03-23-2007 11:25 AM                     Movie theaters should not be footing anywhere near the entire bill for any digital projection system. I think any movie theater that is asked to pay 100% of the cost of any digital projection system should reply: The movie studios should be paying a significant amount of the cost, perhaps even the majority of the cost. After all, they're the ones who are deriving the greatest benefit from it by saving millions of dollars on print duplication and shipping costs.  |  IP: Logged Stephen Furley Film God Posts: 3059 From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England Registered: May 2002 posted 03-23-2007 12:18 PM                     The problem with that is that if somebody other than the cinema owns/pays for the projection equipment then somebody other than the cinema is very likely to want a say in what gets programmed to be shown on it.  |  IP: Logged David Zylstra Master Film Handler Posts: 432 From: Novi, MI, USA Registered: Mar 2007 posted 03-23-2007 03:33 PM                     Enter AccessIT, Technicolor Digital Cinema, DCIP (and others?) . . . these entities "lease" the equipment to theatres and the equipment/lease payments get paid for by VPFs (Virtaul Print Fees) . . . . each theatre gets the equipment almost for free, all they have to do is commit to a service contract . . . . I know AccessIT wants to be in the delivery and alternative content business so they charge the exhibitor a nominal fee per print delivered and the film companies pay them a per-movie fee that is less than a 35mm print costs. I heard that Christie's newest digital projector using TI's latest 2K chip costs 20% less to make, so progress is already being made on getting the costs down . . . . but once all screens are digital the market dwindles down to about 1000 projectors per year (1000/yr is the average screen count growth across the US in the last few years) Most contracts should include language that keeps control in the hands of the exhibitor.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.