my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Chromadepth 3D

Author Topic: Chromadepth 3D Ken Lackner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1907 From: Atlanta, GA, USA Registered: Sep 2001 posted 03-22-2007 09:19 PM                     When doing research on various 3D techniques, I started thinking about a 3D laser show I saw at the Vanderbilt Planetarium when I was a kid. The glasses provided the 3D effect by making each color of the spectrum appear to be at a different depth. Pretty cool stuff. I started Googling it, and found out the technique is called chromatic dispersion, or ChromaDepth . You can look at any photograph or drawing, and the colors will have depth. So if an artist is creative, he can create a peice of content that has the correct depth by correctly coloring the objects. The website even says that certain films, such as Mulan and Batman & Robin, have lended themselves quite well to the process -- unintentionally. So the question here is why haven't any film makers taken advantage of this techniuqe to intentionally produce content that lends itself to this process? There would be NO special equipment required to project the films, glasses are dirt cheap, and the content would look just fine without even wearing the glasses. I think it would be great to see films that use this technique for 3D.  |  IP: Logged David Zylstra Master Film Handler Posts: 432 From: Novi, MI, USA Registered: Mar 2007 posted 03-22-2007 11:05 PM                     Actually, I think a similar process is being used for Dolby's 3D system that was showcased at ShoWest 07 - they are using dichroic lenses for each eye. As I understand it there is a modification needed in the projector light path as well as expensive glasses. The process was explained to me and I don't understand it completely enough to re-explain it. Two issues were noted - the current glasses are expensive and if you look to the edge of the screen without moving your head there is no 3D effect - both issues are being worked on and price will come down and I'm sure they can work out a better lens design.  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 03-23-2007 03:09 AM                     During projection, the left and right eye images from the digital projector(s)are polarized perpendicular,to one another as they are projected onto the screen by means of diffuser filters. By wearing special eyeglasses with lenses polarized in their respective directions to match the diffused projection, the left projector eye image can be viewed only by the left eye since the polarization of the left lens will cancel out that of the right projector eye projection, and the right projector eye image can be viewed only by the right eye since the polarization of the right lens will cancel out that of the left eye projection. If you take two pairs of polarized glasses and match up the lenses then rotate one lens, you will notice that the minute lines in the two lens material either lets light in totally, or goes completely black when the lenses are at right angles to one other. Goes the same for polarized sunglasses - match up the lens, look through it and rotate one lens 90 degrees...image goes from grey to solid black. Have some fun with this 3D-site here...  |  IP: Logged Ken Lackner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1907 From: Atlanta, GA, USA Registered: Sep 2001 posted 03-23-2007 03:38 AM                     This system is actually very different from the Dolby 3D. As far as I know, with Dolby 3D, there are still two images -- right eye and left eye -- projected on screen. As with other methods, the glasses provide a way of filtering so that the left eye image is only visible to the left eye, and the right eye image is only visible to the right eye. With ChromaDepth, you do not have two images. There is a single image that will look perfectly normal without glasses. But put on a pair of the glasses, and the magic happens. Any color photograph, website, magazine article, brochure, etc... will have depth to it. An artist can, therefore, design a picture to have the proper depth by carefully choosing his colors, knowing that red will appear closest to the viewer, blue will appear furthest away, and other colors will be somewhere in between. I don't imagine it would be all that difficult to apply this creative process to film making. As I said, no special equipment would be required to project the film, and the film would look perfectly normal to anyone not wearing glasses; it would merely lack the depth the glasses give it. EDIT: Looks like Monte was busy typing the same time I was. That's some good info on ploarization, but what does it have to do with this topic? Neither Dolby 3D nor the system I mention use polarization as the means of achieving 3D. In addition, if we want to be techincally acurate, the Real D system (which I assume you are talking about since you say, "During projection, the left and right eye images from the digital projector...") does not use linear polarization, it uses circular polarization .  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 03-23-2007 04:20 AM                     Thx for the correction on polarization.  |  IP: Logged Chris Parry Film Handler Posts: 8 From: Richmond BC Canada Registered: Feb 2007 posted 03-23-2007 01:58 PM                        With all this talk of 3D, one thing I know for sure... One-eyed people are gonna be pissed.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 03-23-2007 03:00 PM                        Find a way to eliminate the "glasses" and you will have som ething marketable! Louis  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 03-23-2007 04:30 PM                  quote: Chris Parry One-eyed people are gonna be pissed. Hey! Hey! HEY!  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 03-23-2007 04:43 PM                       Phil! ROFL!!!  |  IP: Logged Brian Guckian Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 594 From: Dublin, Ireland Registered: Apr 2003 posted 04-02-2007 04:20 PM                     quote: Find a way to eliminate the "glasses" and you will have something marketable! Louis There have been developments in single-user 3D displays where the viewer does not require glasses...the potential market here being for laptops, PDAs, mobiles etc. For group viewing, perhaps holography is the way to go to finally eliminate the glasses? BTW the new Dolby system AFAIK is a development of the traditional anaglyph method. However, much more precise colour filtering is used, and two different spectra, each containing complementary RGB components, are fed to each eye. Presumably, high-speed sequential projection of Left-Eye / Right-Eye images is also employed. The glasses are reported as being inexpensive, as well. The Chromadepth technique is very interesting, but since it is colour-dependent it looks as if it may be restricted to artificial imagery (if red is the colour that appears closest, as they point out, then it follows that all close objects must be rendered red), which probably explains its lack of take-up by the industry.  |  IP: Logged Bill Enos Film God Posts: 2081 From: Richmond, Virginia, USA Registered: Apr 2000 posted 04-02-2007 10:08 PM                     If 3D ever takes off, congress will pass a law making it unlawful to discriminate against the one eyed and it will all be over.  |  IP: Logged Ron Curran Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 504 From: Springwood NSW Australia Registered: Feb 2006 posted 04-03-2007 12:43 AM                        Yes, and there are a lot of one-eyed politicians.  |  IP: Logged Ken Lackner Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1907 From: Atlanta, GA, USA Registered: Sep 2001 posted 04-03-2007 05:49 AM                     quote: Brian Guckian The Chromadepth technique is very interesting, but since it is colour-dependent it looks as if it may be restricted to artificial imagery (if red is the colour that appears closest, as they point out, then it follows that all close objects must be rendered red), which probably explains its lack of take-up by the industry. I would agree with that. But their own website says that Mulan looked really good in 3D with a pair of Chromadepth glasses, and it was totally unintentional. I'm not an animator or film maker, but I don't imagine it would be too difficult to make animated films that take advantage of the technique. How realistic are the colors in many animated films anyway?  |  IP: Logged Brian Guckian Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 594 From: Dublin, Ireland Registered: Apr 2003 posted 04-03-2007 08:21 AM                     True - but note that the other methods can be used for all kinds of material. Once again, the exhibitor is faced with format overload! But it would be nice to see a demo...  |  IP: Logged Frank Angel Film God Posts: 5305 From: Brooklyn NY USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 04-04-2007 12:26 PM                        There was a process that I recall reading about I believe in American Cinematographer many years ago when they had an outstanding issue devoted entirely to 3D, I can't recall the name it was given, but it used some kind of prism system in the camera lens that rendered an anaglypic image, but unlike standard (horrific) anaglyphic 3D, it was 2D compatible. The way it work was, it kept the subject in perfect focus and at 100% convergence, so it's colors were not separated into red and green and it looked like any normal 2D image. BUT, everything around it, i.e., the stuff in front of it and behind it were either converged in front of the screen or behind the screen and the prism arrangement in the lens cause the green and red images to separate. The result created a very watchable image without glasses because the primary subject in the image was not a double image but a normal, combination of the red/green split. However, if you put on anaglypic glasses (yuck), you did see depth. AC used one of these semi-anaglyphic images on it's front cover and it was quite impresive. And of course the beauty of it was that it was totally compatable with any recording/playback medium....TV, print, film, etc., with nothing more that the special taking lens. The playback system is untouched. The big drawback (besides the anaglyphic issues) is that to get any kind of depth, you need to always have shallow focus, i.e., the subject needs to be in focus whilst everything else needs to be soft or totally out of focus. This would be irksomely limiting to any cinematographer. But it is a cute gimmick, and you probably could get away with applying it to some bad TV show....American Idol! tonite in Depth-o-Vision.....and then tie it in with some fast food manufacture....Get your special glasses only at MacDonalds. Naturally they would claim it was the first time ever that a TV show was being broadcast in special, new Depth-0-Vision. Everyone would get all excited, but then they would buy their fries with the special box at MacDonalds and peel off the cardboard glasses on the side and realize, Hey, these are just the same freakin crappy red and blue glasses they always use! And that would be the last time Depth-0-Vision would be used, but for that one time, lots of people would make lots of money. Aint that the way it works?  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.