my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Commenting on: Irem Rectifiers (Page 1)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Author Topic: Commenting on: Irem Rectifiers Demetris Thoupis Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1240 From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus Registered: Apr 2001 posted 03-17-2007 01:31 PM                     I thought that it would be nice if we could start some topics focussed on specific brands and self reviewing equipment that we use for years and years! I would like to make a start by commenting on Irem Rectifiers. We have been using them for many many years and have found them to be very reliable with the only exception of some burned diodes every once and a while. I believe that Irem rectifiers are the BEST in the market. The only downside of them, if you can call it downside, is the weight and size of them. I believe though that now that is also fixed as IREM has given us the oportunity of using Rack Mounted Xenon Power Supplies which can either be single or three phase and electronically controlled either from the front panel or via RS232 control. We have been installing Irem rectifiers for many years and also moving from old closed cinemas to re-opened cinemas these rectifiers and have never failed us. A Bravo to Irem for making such tremendous products. Demetris  |  IP: Logged Kevin Raisler Film Handler Posts: 52 From: Warsaw, IN, USA Registered: Jun 2003 posted 03-17-2007 11:11 PM                    I've only ever used IREM and have no need or curiosity for anything else. Smooth Clean Light with with no fuss.  |  IP: Logged William Phillips Expert Film Handler Posts: 117 From: Cardigan, Wales, UK Registered: Feb 2002 posted 03-18-2007 06:59 AM                        N3-75 Rectifier very good. Time will tell on my newer N3-100  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-18-2007 09:14 AM                     In my exerince with them over the last 27 years typical lamp life with Irem's is no where near as good as with Christie's rectifiers. The tension adjust on the movable core needs to be adjusted often when they get older because of the compression set of the fibre and phenolic spacers. This is particuluarly a problem on the larger Irems... 4KW and up. Over all they are a so-so deal. Christie is in my experience still the winner by a huge margin. Mark  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 03-18-2007 10:15 AM                        Christie is reliable but inefficient. IREM (except for occasional diode or contactor) is utterly reliable and as for bulb life: I have never removed a 2k Osram below 4500 hours with 6000 "doable." I do understand that ripple is high, but, with the very long bulb life I have experienced, I have come to the conclusion that ripple must be good, at least when IREM does it. I have similar results with other bulb sizes. Because of ORC, Strong switchers, and old Strong electronic power supplies I avoid electronic "intensive" rectifiers. Especially now, with lead free arriving, the reliability will be unacceptable. I have had good luck with Christie & IREM. FYI: When you send Osram a warranty claim; the bulb is tested using standard IREM equipment. In years gone by, they would light a bulb that would not work on any other rectifier. Louis  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-18-2007 12:41 PM                     quote: Louis Bornwasser I have never removed a 2k Osram below 4500 hours with 6000 "doable." Louis, 6000 doable hours is nuttin but I won't also say that short life is in part the problem of the Osram lamps since thats what I see around here too. We typically get twice that life with Christie rectifiers running Christie lamps. There is one 2kw in St George at 19,000 hours now and these lamps come out clear. They just begin to have unstable arcs. Efficiency is irrelevant at this long life so the low cost of the lamp has already offset any extra trivial power costs. The Irem's in this area typically provide rated hours and then some... perhaps 500 to 750 extra hours... thats nothing to write home bout. Mark  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 03-18-2007 12:44 PM                     Older N type IREM, I feel, had a better build quality. The IREM switchers I serviced had connector and fuse problems. Proyecson makes a great standard and switching series which is superior to IREM...other manufacturers are buying them under private label. As for rack mount rectifers there are several sources. Our rental hardware is based on 1/2/3000 watt units for projection and spotlight and all of these are housed in 5.75" high rack mount modules which where custom built.  |  IP: Logged Scott Norwood Film God Posts: 8146 From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas) Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-18-2007 02:04 PM                        I have a pair of IREM P1-X30B rectifiers (500w) in my home setup and they weigh a ton, but I feel like some of the components are a bit on the cheesy side. I had a fuse holder disintegrate on me a week or so ago and (after removing a couple of dozen screws to open the unit) I replaced it with one that cost about $3 at the local electronics parts place and which was of visibly higher quality. The little cooling fans inside these have soft metal blades that are easily bent. Maybe they just went cheap on these low-end models which, admittedly, aren't likely to be found in commercial theatres. As for the larger IREM models, I don't have any real comments, except to say that I am happy that I don't have to move them, as the ones that I have seen have all been extremely heavy.  |  IP: Logged Demetris Thoupis Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1240 From: Aradippou, Larnaca, Cyprus Registered: Apr 2001 posted 03-18-2007 04:15 PM                     What would be interesting to see is comparing the product in terittories. US uses 110V while Europe use 230V. That might be a reason for many facts. Here for example Christie projectors which have inverters inside to convert 230V to 110V had problems with burned motors often. Once installed a UPS the problem solved somehow but not completely. We never had this kind of problem with Cinemeccanica or Kinoton projectors. This might be the case with Irem rectifiers. If what Mark is saying is true, perhaps the conversion from 230 to 110 might have something to do about it. As far as I am concerned, Irem makes damn fine rectifiers.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 03-18-2007 04:55 PM                        Demeteris: I think the 60 Hz vs. 50 Hz is more important when dealing with inductive loads like motors and rectifiers. IREM's run stone cold in 60 Hz countries; they heat somewhat in 50 Hz areas. That is why 2000 watts works OK on 75 amp rectifiers, while "you guys" limit that load to 1600 watts. Louis  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-18-2007 05:49 PM                     quote: Louis Bornwasser IREM's run stone cold in 60 Hz countries Louis.. pleeze... that is just not true!! You must not have any 4kw or larger Irems running. Come out here and I'll let you feel the heat . In fact next time I open one up to adjust it's core from vibrating I'll be all to happy to measure the temperature rise for you.... running 140 amps its significent. Mark  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-18-2007 05:53 PM                     Irems have their ups and downs. I too find that a lamp fired on a Christie power supply will last far longer than fired on an IREM. I've never had really great life out of IREM powered lamps. Don't run an IREM close to the top of its range...it tends to have harmonic issues that will put noise on the AC line too (had this measured as to why the circuit breakers were heating up when a pair of N3-180 rectifiers were outputting about 160 amps. IREM absolutely undersizes its contactors for the US market...we run on 208, not 230 nor 380 (some of Europe). Some 208 sites are closer to 200 too. As such, the input current is higher to compensate (power is power). IREM has raised the contactor ratings over the years but in my opinion, not enough. For the smaller rectifiers, one should use an A26 series rather than the supplied A16. For the larger rectifiers (100s to 180s) use an A40 contactor rather than the supplied A30. I know some to have just replaced the fancy 4P contactor with an off the shelf Square-D 50A contactor without problem either (in the US, no one uses that latching feature the 4th pole brings). All IREMs hum...yes you can adjust them but they will be humming again soon...this goes on until you run out of adjustment. They size their diodes to just barely work...why? The cost of say an 85A/1600PIV diode versus a 40A/400PIV is not significant in the cost of the rectifier. To top it off, they don't have good surge supression so they are more likely to go. Putting surge supression on the AC input will go a long way to long diode life. This is also true of Christie...they chew through diodes if surge supression is not added to the rectifier's AC input.  |  IP: Logged Marin Zorica Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 671 From: Biograd na Moru, Croatia Registered: May 2003 posted 03-18-2007 06:31 PM                     I have experience with N3-110, on 3phase, 50Hz....work's great, without heat and noise.....I really think they will be noisier because has magnetic shunt regulation! This conversation give's me clue to take oscilloscope and measure ripple on Irem.... But I know that Irem produced a SMPS PS for Prevost portable machines P86X to power XBO and I know for couple of that portable pair...and everybody have problems with that PS! But I hate that they don't have choke on DC output...which compensate AC ripple good. Here many rectifiers which are primarily for carbon arc uses to power XBO, so then we mostly installed choke od DC out to get lower AC ripple! I built myself rectifier for a 500 XBO, running on 30A have 5% ripple and is single phase!  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-19-2007 12:44 AM                     For the N3-100 and G3-100 and smaller, the choke on the output is an option called the "AFU". The choke is standard on the N3-150 and G3-150 and above. Oddly, Strong has stopped supplying the choke on their High Reactance power supplies. Too bad. I think the choke helps not only with ripple but back spikes from the igniter reaching the diode stack on ignition.  |  IP: Logged Marin Zorica Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 671 From: Biograd na Moru, Croatia Registered: May 2003 posted 04-04-2007 05:52 PM                     Yesterday I went to one location and measured AC ripple on IREM N3-110....it's 5,3% at 85A!  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.