Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Halloween on Halloween

   
Author Topic: Halloween on Halloween
Tom Tomlinson
Film Handler

Posts: 21
From: Port Washington, NY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 11-01-2006 02:40 PM      Profile for Tom Tomlinson   Email Tom Tomlinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi,
I just wanted to get any feedback on the "Original Halloween" screening over the last 2 nights at certain Regal/AMC theaters nationwide. It was from a HD source(720P?).
I saw it in NYC last night & was pretty disappointed. While it wasn't an ntsc dvd, it was disappointing for no screen masking to cover up 2.35 letterboxing on the HD.I do so enjoy seeing 2 different blacks on display. It also came from the pre-show projector which to me, is not a good way to market Digital Cinema.The theater should use the higher quality projectors when they are charging us normal admission.
I was also hoping they could've removed more grain in the HD transfer.
When it was over, I would've preferred a slightly dirty film print.
Can anyone give me more technical info and/or observations.
Thanks,
Tom

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 11-01-2006 04:51 PM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wow. I remember when they charged full price for the Boondock Saints director's cut, the screening that fell on the same day as the film's DVD release.

Who really eats this stuff up? [Confused]

 |  IP: Logged

Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 11-02-2006 10:25 AM      Profile for Evans A Criswell   Author's Homepage   Email Evans A Criswell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A friend of mine saw this and was disappointed and said he wouldn't be going to future showings of that kind because he felt he could get a better presentation from a DVD at home. The pre-show advertising projectors do not have sufficient resolution for movie presentation and the blurriness is obvious if you're too close to the screen.

My friend, who saw Halloween, said:

Halloween was basically the DVD projected onto the theater screen. Blurry and letterboxed to boot. The sound was good. It was nice seeing it with some people who evidently hadn't seen it before, given the moans and squeals behind us. But still. If you have a DVD, I think you'd get a better presentation at home.

Personally, I find this current trend in a movie theatre presenation to be appalling and it makes me not want to go to any kind of "special engagement" that isn't a new release because I might as well just watch the DVD on my system at home if theatres are going to pull off this kind of presentation on an advertising projector with a source that has poor resolution and picture quality. Plus, they letterboxed the scope-shaped image on the flat screen when all their theatres have adjustable masking. Their source may be better than DVD but many cheap data-type projectors make the images look terrible. In fact, I've seen some data projectors that can turn DVD into something that looks worse than VHS on a good TV (like last Saturday night at a play I attended where a video from DVD was played before the play started - it looked blurry and awful), so I would be surprised to see projectors that can turn 720p into something that looks worse than a good DVD on a good 16:9 TV.

When people realize that theatres are showing something that doesn't even look as good as DVD on a high-quality 16:9 set, why will they bother going back? They might get the impression that it's par for the course for "digital projection" to be that way and avoid it.

 |  IP: Logged

Dan Lyons
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 698
From: Seal Beach, CA
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 11-02-2006 12:42 PM      Profile for Dan Lyons   Email Dan Lyons   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I guess my audience was luckier than these poor folks. A few years back I had the pleasure of running a newly struck EK print of this title. [thumbsup]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Scott
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1300
From: Minneapolis, MN
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 11-02-2006 01:17 PM      Profile for Steve Scott   Email Steve Scott   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Those projectors use 500 watt lamps, right?

Maybe 1,000?
[Roll Eyes]

 |  IP: Logged

Tom Tomlinson
Film Handler

Posts: 21
From: Port Washington, NY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 11-02-2006 01:49 PM      Profile for Tom Tomlinson   Email Tom Tomlinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If its from dvd, I guess this press release wasn't entirely accurate.

“HALLOWEEN” RETURNS TO THEATRES!
ORIGINAL 1978TEENAGE HORRORCLASSICWILL PLAY IN125
SELECT MOVIE THEATRES NATIONWIDE ON OCT. 30 & 31, 2006
DigitallyRemastered “Halloween” will be Shown for First Time in High-Definition, Plus an
In-Theatre Exclusive20-Minute Featurette withOriginal Cast Members andRob Zombie
Presented by Trancas International,VOOM’s Monsters HD and National CineMedia

 |  IP: Logged

Evans A Criswell
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1579
From: Huntsville, AL, USA
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 11-02-2006 02:37 PM      Profile for Evans A Criswell   Author's Homepage   Email Evans A Criswell   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think it was literally from DVD, but I'll bet many theatres' presentations of this movie on Halloween didn't look as good as a well-setup 16:9 system showing an anamorphically-encoded DVD. High definition source does not mean high-definition on-screen appearance, especially if played on a projector meant for advertising, and not made to take advantage of the screen aspect ratio. High-definition can mean so many things these days. 720p is less than a megapixel. Couple that with a projector that probably doesn't have the proper native resolution for the screen aspect ratio and the source and you end up with a poor presentation.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark J. Marshall
Film God

Posts: 3188
From: New Castle, DE, USA
Registered: Aug 2002


 - posted 11-03-2006 08:39 AM      Profile for Mark J. Marshall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Evans A Criswell
the blurriness is obvious if you're too close to the screen
That is the definition of an understatement. I checked a few days ago... from dead center of our biggest auditorium, I can see pixels on the screen - even with the florescent work lights on - without my glasses. And I'm near sighted. I don't see any pixels from three inches away from my HD television at home.

HD my ass.

And by the way, I have the Monsters HD Voom channel at home. And they run the Halloween series all the time, and in true HD, they look great.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Olpin
Chop Chop!

Posts: 1852
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 11-04-2006 12:23 PM      Profile for Mike Olpin   Email Mike Olpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Regal locations use the Christie L6 projector which has a native resolution of 1024x768. It will accept sources up to 1280x1024. It has a fixed aspect ration of 4:3. Preshow content is formated aprx 1.85:1 and the projector is zoomed in to fill at least 75% of a flat masked screen. For feature content, such as Halloween, both lamps are utilized for maximum brightness, wheras only one lamp is used for preshow content. The bluriness people see is often caused by a missaligned LCD panel inside the projector. If the projector is aligned properly, you should see the "screen door" pretty clearly from the front half of the auditorium. With fresh bulbs, the image from the rear half of the auditorium is superb, however the reality is that many projectionists neglect to change the bulb until they are unbearably dim.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Hamilton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1341
From: Evansville, Indiana
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 11-04-2006 01:08 PM      Profile for Richard Hamilton   Email Richard Hamilton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Mike Olpin
projectionists
is that the proper term now?

Rick

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.