Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » FP20 with short focal length lens

   
Author Topic: FP20 with short focal length lens
Matthew Taylor
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 186
From: Essex, UK
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 10-27-2006 05:47 PM      Profile for Matthew Taylor   Email Matthew Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am considering buying a Philips FP20 with a turret. it has occured to me that there might be a problem using my 32mm lens with this. Does anyone know if the projected beam will clear the projector with out obstruction if used with this lens?

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Guckian
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 594
From: Dublin, Ireland
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 10-28-2006 05:32 PM      Profile for Brian Guckian   Email Brian Guckian   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Check the front of the FP20 and see if the front corner of the main frame has been cut away immediately beside the turret.

Some of Philips'/Kinoton's models had(?)/have this feature to accommodate the greater angle of divergence produced by short focal length lenses.

But you should really try to aim for c.50mm on 1:1.85. Is this something you could look at?

 |  IP: Logged

David Graham Rose
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 187
From: Cambridge, UK
Registered: Sep 2002


 - posted 10-29-2006 05:45 AM      Profile for David Graham Rose   Email David Graham Rose   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Greetings Matthew

To put it bluntly, you are buggered. I tried using a 45mm lens the other day and even that was still clipping the left hand side of the image. Return the projector to the supplier, and tell him/her that it is of no use. Since it is not. Then go out and buy a nice new Century. That will work. The Century projector - the workhorse of the cinema industry.

Regards

David

 |  IP: Logged

Matthew Taylor
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 186
From: Essex, UK
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 10-29-2006 06:33 AM      Profile for Matthew Taylor   Email Matthew Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oh...that's a real shame. I can't really use another lens because this is a home screening room and I have no more room to move the projector back and if I get a smaller lens, I will have an even smaller image than I do now [Frown]

I have this FP20 lined up for purchase (not from a dealer) and due to the reputation the Philips/Kinoton FP20's have, I've been looking forward to getting it. I think a century is going to be out of my league - I only have a hobbyists wallet!

I appreciate the info though.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 10-29-2006 07:02 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Brian Guckian
Check the front of the FP20 and see if the front corner of the main frame has been cut away immediately beside the turret.

Some of Philips'/Kinoton's models had(?)/have this feature to accommodate the greater angle of divergence produced by short focal length lenses.

Can we assume that this is the old FP-20, and not the fairly recently introduced FP-20A? If it is the old FP-20, then I don't think you'll find the cut-out in the corner of the column, this was on the later machines. However, the older machines had smaller columns than the current ones do. I'm doubtful that you'd get away with a 32mm, that's a very short lens.

David, I'm quite surprised that you couldn't use a 45mm; I don't think I've ever used anything shorter than a 50 in one, but the beam was well clear of the column. Maybe even within the older projectors there was some variation in the column size? I've never actually measured it.

I've never used a machine with a turret, but the lens would still have to be in the same position, so that shouldn't make any difference to the shortest lens which can be used.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-29-2006 07:14 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How about using a slightly longer lens with a magna-com attachment? This would at least extend the front of the lens by a few inches and may allow you to get the picture size that you want. The downside, of course, is the image-softening and light-eating properties of the magna-com.

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 10-29-2006 10:17 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I would follow Scott's advice exactly. (It does help to know that this is not a commercial theatre where money is concerned.) Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Matthew Taylor
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 186
From: Essex, UK
Registered: Mar 2004


 - posted 10-29-2006 11:06 AM      Profile for Matthew Taylor   Email Matthew Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks guys. Do the Magnacoms eat loads of light? What sort of price are they on the second hand market?

 |  IP: Logged

Louis Bornwasser
Film God

Posts: 4441
From: prospect ky usa
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 10-29-2006 11:19 AM      Profile for Louis Bornwasser   Author's Homepage   Email Louis Bornwasser   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Should be PLENTY around. They do reduce the light; unfortunately on FLAT where you don't need any reduction. Should be OK for home, though. Good projector otherwise. Louis

 |  IP: Logged

Pete Naples
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1565
From: Dunfermline, Scotland
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 10-29-2006 12:14 PM      Profile for Pete Naples   Email Pete Naples   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe in the US, but over here they were never popular, and have all but dissapeared. I last saw one about 12 years ago.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-29-2006 05:07 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm not as anti-magnacom as others are. I would advise a curved screen with one htough since they will introduce a pincushion.

Alternately, I would look for what ISCO called their Spezial lens. It used a .52X magnifiier with Ultra prime lenses...it was what followed their T-Kiptikon lenses. These lenses were available down to 31.3mm for 35mm projection.

The current generation are sold as an attachment like an anamorphic. They are available for flat field and curved and will carry the "F" or "C" stamp on their barrel, respectively.

I've used these lenses on my AA2 installations in IMAX theatres due to their ability to put out an excellent image without vignetting on the AA2's body.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.