my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 2 blade and 3 blade shutter difference

Author Topic: 2 blade and 3 blade shutter difference Iben Jimenez Film Handler Posts: 27 From: Cayey, PR, US Registered: Mar 2006 posted 04-21-2006 06:35 PM                     What is the difference between 2 blade and 3 blade shutters? What does 48 and 72 interruptions of light per second mean?  |  IP: Logged Kenneth Wuepper Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1026 From: Saginaw, MI, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 04-21-2006 08:38 PM                     Iben, The shutter is needed to block the light while the film is moving from one frame to the next in front of the lens or else you would see a smearing caused by the film traveling in front of the lens. Although a shutter of one blade could accomplish this, it would be mechanically out of balance and, because the human eye can see slow flashes of light, would cause a flicker to be seen by the viewer. Additional blades on the shutter will cause the light to be blocked during film movement and also provide additional flashes of light to eliminate the filcker as seen by the viewer. For discussion only, let's make some symbols: The shutter blocks the light - The shutter blocks light and film moves = The shutter is out of the light path and a flash is shown 0 Therefore the action of the projector and shutter with one blade would look like this: =0=0=0=0=0=0=0=0=0= 24 movements per second 24 flashes 1 blade =0-0=0-0=0-0=0-0= 24 movements per second 48 flashes 2 blades =0-0-0=0-0-0=0-0-0= 24 movements per second 72 flashes 3 blades Hope this helps. KEN  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 04-21-2006 09:03 PM                        Good explanation Ken.  |  IP: Logged Eric Robinson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 538 From: Santa Rosa, CA Registered: Jan 2005 posted 04-22-2006 12:03 AM                     Yes Ken great insight. I was wondering the other day how our two blade shutter could be eliminated and a new design could introduce light blocking only during frame advance, but I was unaware of the human ability to percieve a flicker from this design. Now I must ponder some more...  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 04-22-2006 01:58 AM                     ..plus the 16fps for silent films also used the 3 blade shutter to also get the 48 interruptions per second.  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 04-22-2006 07:55 AM                        Eric; a one blade at 2x speed would still be 48 blinks-per-second but would have the advantage of reducing the open/close time. (Christie & Kinotone) Louis  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-22-2006 11:38 AM                     and the GK21 had a single blade high speed shutter on some as well  |  IP: Logged Thomas King Expert Film Handler Posts: 119 From: Sheffield, Yorkshire, England Registered: Oct 2004 posted 04-22-2006 04:48 PM                        On a related note: does anyone use a 3-blade shutter at 24fps? I tried it once, but found that increased flicker rate wasn't worth the drop in light output.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 04-22-2006 07:00 PM                     MANY screening rooms run 3-wing shutters at 24fps.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-22-2006 07:50 PM                     quote: Thomas King On a related note: does anyone use a 3-blade shutter at 24fps? I tried it once, but found that increased flicker rate wasn't worth the drop in light output. The real idea being to bump the light up the same percentage that the 3-blade shutter decreases it for any given format. 3- bladers are a definate improvement and allow higher light levels if one needs or wants it. Mark  |  IP: Logged Eric Robinson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 538 From: Santa Rosa, CA Registered: Jan 2005 posted 04-22-2006 11:36 PM                     Most of the projectors I maintain are Simplex 35. As far as I know there are no options for changing the shutter speed. Although I have heard that there was a shutter blade in the past with wider blades. Are there options for Simplex 35's? ie like for a Melinium?  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 04-23-2006 02:09 AM                     quote: Although I have heard that there was a shutter blade in the past with wider blades. Are there options for Simplex 35's? ie like for a Millenium? ..and cut out more light with a wider blade? Options are for the Simplex35 units in as well as the Mil2k's is the usage of a shutter with adjustable blades that increases the light output by reducing the interruption attack slightly-mainly for usage in drive-ins and large screen presentation venues..along with the high-speed intermittent assembly to really make this the most light efficent presentation from a Simplex. -Monte  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-23-2006 06:58 AM                     Monte, The adjusta blade shutter is no longer available from Strong. Mark  |  IP: Logged Eric Robinson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 538 From: Santa Rosa, CA Registered: Jan 2005 posted 04-23-2006 12:28 PM                     As I understood it, the current production Simplex shutter blade has been trimmed down to the smallest size possible. I know that even when I have the shutter timing set perfectly, I can still detect slight ghosting at the extreme top and bottom edges of the screen. It would seem that the ghosting would increase if the shutter blades were any smaller. Unless I guess if you used the high speed intermittent. I'm guessing these intermittents simply have a faster frame adavnce cycle? Are they more expensive? More prone to break? Do they fit all Simplex 35 XL's?  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 04-23-2006 05:27 PM                     3-wing shutters are available for Simplexes and are standard on the PR1020, PR1030 projectors. Strong did loose the adjusta-shutters as Mark mentioned. Simplex, long ago, standardized on the 84-degree shutter though. If everything is working perfectly in your machine with near zero gear lash, the 84-degree shutter should work. The problem is if Strong cuts the shutter even slightly less or if you have too much slop anywhere in the drive train...you WILL get a very faint ghost. Century needs 90-degree shutters, period (on 35mm). Century tried wider opening but they ALWAYS have ghosting then.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.