my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » How do you know if your reflector dichroic coating is gone?

Author Topic: How do you know if your reflector dichroic coating is gone? Eric Robinson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 538 From: Santa Rosa, CA Registered: Jan 2005 posted 04-14-2006 11:12 AM                     I have several lamphouses (Strong Super Highlight II, with 4000W xenon bulb installed) which seem to generate significant heat despite excellent cooling (bulb, roof exhaust, gate cooling fan.) I have just installed a new heat filter lens in the snood which is facing the correct way. If I turn the bulb current up to about 90% of the bulbs max rated current, the projection lens becomes very hot ie. you can't touch it with your hand for too long. The bulb adjustments are set correctly, so that the reflector is not focusing uneeded light on the heat shields or the areas around the aperture. At this point I'm guessing the dicroic coating of the reflector has died, but I don't know how to test this theory. Any ideas?  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 04-15-2006 04:00 PM                     The coating is generally golden colored and as it flakes the reflector will throw more I.R. to the film. Flaking and reflector darkening, which causes the most heat, will be at the F1 point of the reflector which is where the arc gap of the xenon bulb is located with in the reflector. If that is the Strong 15" reflector running 4KW in the Highlight II ( generally )that unit is not as efficient as the newer style 13.5" reflector. Is your dichoric heat filter properly mounted at an angle to reflect the I.R. away from the reflector?  |  IP: Logged Jack Ondracek Film God Posts: 2348 From: Port Orchard, WA, USA Registered: Oct 2002 posted 04-15-2006 06:50 PM                        Another item that will make a big difference: Make sure your exhaust is drawing more air than the internal blower is pulling. If you can feel heat from your snood, you don't have enough exhaust and the internal blower is pushing hot air into your projector. My projectors went from hot to nearly cold to the touch when I changed blowers here.  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 04-16-2006 09:46 PM                     This where the basic question that I have as well - I have X-90's with mirrors that are flaking directly across from the flame point in the bulb. Course, these mirrors are the mirrors that are doped in the circular frame, thus the mirrors can't act as very good heatsinks due to the isolation of the mirror to frame by the dope. -Monte  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-17-2006 10:14 AM                     The heat transfer is from airflow across the back surface of the reflector not the frame  |  IP: Logged Cory Isemann Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 500 From: White Plains, MD, USA Registered: Jun 2004 posted 04-17-2006 11:00 AM                        Say your coating is gone.. can you have it resurfaced? At what cost? Would you save more over time if you just bought new ones?  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-17-2006 11:01 AM                     UltraFlat will refinish it to a very good efficient hot mirror  |  IP: Logged Cory Isemann Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 500 From: White Plains, MD, USA Registered: Jun 2004 posted 04-17-2006 11:53 AM                        I see they have a product called "UltraClean". Has anyone used this stuff? We have Xetron XCN consoles with 2k bulbs whose reflectors are very hazy. I've tried everything to clean them to no avail. I've just about given up and chalk the appearance of them to age (they're about 11 years old)  |  IP: Logged Richard Hamilton Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1341 From: Evansville, Indiana Registered: Jan 2000 posted 04-17-2006 11:57 AM                     Just dont go beyond the specs of the original blower. I had an interesting conversation with an engineer from Osram. He looked at the design of the Mega lamphouse and told me because of the lamphouse design, we had "cold spots" on the bulb due to the positioning of the fans. He said this would cause some turbulance inside the bulb. Rick  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 04-17-2006 12:59 PM                     quote: Gordon McLeod The heat transfer is from airflow across the back surface of the reflector not the frame ..which is horrible with these early X-90 consoles with that 2 inch blowhole positioned below the cathode seal..since that one blower has to feed both blowholes. Once again..poor lamphouse design...-Monte  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 04-17-2006 03:15 PM                     Ultraclean has an chalky medium suspended in a liquid with a tiny bit of grit for polishing...guaranteed to destroy any dichoric coating in one polish but fine for rodium or nickel plated reflectors. I did modifications on a bunch of lamphouses for a manufacturer where the airflow was so imbalanced it was almost a vaccum in the front of the box versus the rear...new air slots in the front made the bulb vendor happy regarding tubulence and explosion issues  |  IP: Logged Eric Robinson Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 538 From: Santa Rosa, CA Registered: Jan 2005 posted 04-17-2006 03:19 PM                     quote: Richard Fowler Is your dichoric heat filter properly mounted at an angle to reflect the I.R. away from the reflector? Yes, the filter lens is mounted in a metal ring at a slight angle. I don't have any yellow flaking, just a lot of heat radiation. I was looking for some type of measurement test method I could employ to test the coating or reflector performance. These reflectors go for $2K to $3K each, so I would hate to recommend a replacement and be out all of that money if I was wrong.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-17-2006 08:25 PM                     quote: Cory Isemann We have Xetron XCN consoles with 2k bulbs whose reflectors are very hazy. Cory, You need to get the Big Sky upgrade kits for those consoles. You will get at least double the light out of them with the upgrade. Just did one in Casper, WY last week and light levels jumped way up, especially on the sides. Typically redone non-dicro mirrors are so close in cost to new factory dicro mirrors that purchasing new mirrors makes far more sense. Keep in mind that you will be getting a standard reflector back... not a dichotic as may have been the original.... then you will need to add heat filters on 3KW and larger lamps so there goes about another 500.00 plus. Re-done mirrors are manily reserved for those with obsolete equipment that cannot obtain any sort of new mirror. Ultraflat can do Dichroic but at great additional cost over the base price of the standard mirror. According to Bob Destolphi at Ultraflat they do very vew of them. quote: Eric Robinson These reflectors go for $2K to $3K each They don't cost any where near that much! Mark  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 04-17-2006 08:49 PM                        'bout half of that. Louis  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.