my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Recommendations for 16mm format lens

Author Topic: Recommendations for 16mm format lens Alain LeTourneau Film Handler Posts: 37 From: Portland, OR Registered: Jan 2004 posted 10-31-2005 05:25 PM                        I'm curious what the experts on this list think is the *best* lens for the 16mm format? Not certain if some longer lenses perform better than shorter ones, so give me your thoughts. For mounting on Eiki 6100/9100, Elmo LX series, Kinoton FP16/18, or Eastman 25. Alain LeTourneau  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-31-2005 05:31 PM                     This isn't even a close call. The ISCO Vario-Kiptaron 20-60mm (not to be confused by its cheaper cousin 35-65mm). The Eiki mount version is part number 481.30 The Elmo mount version is part number 481.01 The Kinoton mount version is part number 481.11 Note, the Kinoton and Eiki mounts are the same diameter (42.5mm) but the Eiki version has the ribs to allow focus, the Kinoton version is smooth...an Eiki will work in a Kinoton. This lens is better than ANY fixed focal length lens I've ever tried for 16mm...including some pretty high-dollar 35mm format lenses. They are special order only though...sometimes it can be a pain getting a price quote.  |  IP: Logged Jon Miller Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 973 From: San Diego, CA, USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 10-31-2005 07:00 PM                     Steve, is the Isco you quoted even better than a fixed-focal-length Schneider Cine-Xenon? I've found the Schnieders to be a vast improvement over the crappy standard Eiki lenses and pretty hard to beat.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 10-31-2005 07:39 PM                     Yes, absolutely...it is even better than the Schneider Super Cinelux or the ISCO Ultra Star...I don't know why...it just seems to be blessed.  |  IP: Logged Jeff Taylor Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 601 From: Chatham, NJ/East Hampton, NY Registered: Apr 2000 posted 11-01-2005 08:59 AM                     I'm sure you're right, Steve, but there was a guy in LA selling NIB Super Cinelux Schneiders last year for $300 and I just couldn't resist. What a step up from a standard Eiki lens, which I assume must actually be a Kowa, or something similar.  |  IP: Logged Jon Miller Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 973 From: San Diego, CA, USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 11-01-2005 07:20 PM                     IIRC, new Cine-Xenons for 16mm projectors list somewhere in the neighborhood of $1800. When I saw what the guy in LA was offering for his Schneiders, I just couldn't resist either and added a few from him to my collection. The quality to price ratio in this circumstance was just impossible to ignore. Tests of one of the Scheniders against an equivalent Eiki lens using a loop of 16-PA (RP-82) just proved how worthwhile the Schneiders were. Factory Eiki lenses from the 1970s were Kowa (not-so-)Super Prominars. In the 1980s, the lenses appeared the same, but only the Eiki logo appeared on the lenses. Could be that either Kowa OEM'd the lenses or Eiki bought the Kowa plant.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 11-02-2005 11:50 AM                     $300 on a Schneider is a steal...it isn't a bad lens at all...in fact, it was the Schneider Cinlux Ultra line in the appropriate barrel.  |  IP: Logged Amanda Mundin Expert Film Handler Posts: 122 From: Belper, Derbyshire, UK Registered: Sep 2005 posted 11-02-2005 02:52 PM                     Does the ISCO Vario-Kiptaron 20-60mm fit a Fumeo X900 too? Out of interest will this lens cover super16? Also are there any lenses that drop down to 16-17mm also for the 16mm Fumeo X900?  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 11-02-2005 07:27 PM                     If I'm not mistaken, the Fumeo also uses the 42.5mm lens barrel...if so then yes. I've used the lens for Super-16 without any problems.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-02-2005 07:39 PM                     The Fumeo is a 42.5mm lens mount the focus is by a spline that engages the edges of the lens If the lens barrel is smooth it is a bit jumpy getting it focused  |  IP: Logged Alain LeTourneau Film Handler Posts: 37 From: Portland, OR Registered: Jan 2004 posted 11-03-2005 09:13 PM                        Thanks to all who responded to my query. A recap... Dream lens - ISCO Kiptaron 20-60mm (Steve Guttag)*. Runner up for those on a budget (like myself) - Schneider Super-Cinelux (Jeff Taylor, Jon Miller), with Steve Guttag adding that the Super-Cinelux is actually the Cinelux Ultra in a different barrel. Questions: (1) What's the price of the ISCO you mention Steve? This can off course be repsonded to offlist if I'm violating any rules of the forum - info@40frames.org. (2) Is there a good lens (new or otherwise) that can be found in the $500-1000 range? *Note: I have 2 of the cheaper ISCO 35-65, and while they may not be the quality of what is mentioned above they were certinly an improvement over the Eiki lenses I was using prior. Alain LeTourneau  |  IP: Logged Phillip Grace Expert Film Handler Posts: 164 From: ACMI. Melbourne. Australia. Registered: Mar 2004 posted 11-04-2005 12:21 AM                     Be very careful when choosing lenses for the 16mm Fumeo. The lens mount is very long, and there are likely to be problems getting the lens close enough to the film to focus. We managed to deal with this by machining about 12mm from the front of the lens mount, which left the focusing pinion intact. I think we had to shift a leaf spring to the other end of the mount, but it worked fine. It was a better option than trying to machine the step off the front of the lens barrel.  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 11-04-2005 06:01 AM                     Alain, The Schneider 16mm lens was never termed "Super-Cinelux". They were always from the Cinelux-Ultra line. The "Super" line of Cinelux lenses were what came after and are current today (When Schneider terms a lens "SC"...they mean Super-Cinelux). The 16mm lenses were mady by takeing the lens section out of the 70.6mm (or 62.5mm barrel and screwing them into the 42.5mm barrel. In fact, Schneider in the USA would keep spare 42.5mm lens barrels and make the change at the time of order when the Cinelux Ultra lenses were available. I am trying to get a current price on the Vario-Kiptaron 20-60 (called for a quote yesterday)...I'll email you the price when I have it. It will likely top $1000. The 20-60mm version of the Vario-Kiptaron is about 10-times better than the 35-65 version, no joke. The Schneider lenses are no slouch though...very good for 16mm. I think we sold a ton of them (mostly 35mm focal length) before moving onto the ISCO (and Schneider discontinued the Ultra line in favor of the Super-Cinelux, which could not be adapted to a 42.5mm barrel).  |  IP: Logged Alain LeTourneau Film Handler Posts: 37 From: Portland, OR Registered: Jan 2004 posted 11-04-2005 07:21 PM                        What lens mount does the Eastman 25 use, or does a mount have to be machined specifically for this projector? Alain LeTourneau  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.