my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Christie AW-1, 2,3 difference?

Author Topic: Christie AW-1, 2,3 difference? John H. Crawford Film Handler Posts: 38 From: Carbondale Illinois USA Registered: Mar 2005 posted 08-19-2005 04:18 PM                     What's the difference between the AW-1, AW-2, and AW-3 platters? Is it mechanical?  |  IP: Logged Louis Bornwasser Film God Posts: 4441 From: prospect ky usa Registered: Mar 2005 posted 08-19-2005 05:02 PM                        The AW-1 had a fibreglass disc and neon lights as a source. The AW-2 had "improved" L.E.D. sensors and a better disc (metal band around it. Both were made by Bob Potts in Champaign/Urbana. The AW-3 is an all new design about 1975 designed & built in Los Angeles. Bob Potts made many, many platters most of which were Ok to excellent. Unfortunately the AW-2 and AW-1 were not good; certainly not for 2005. Few parts available; much tweaking for the period of time until you give up and discard the unit. More if you need it, Louis  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 08-19-2005 05:45 PM                       FWIW, the quadracs in the AW-1 (the active element in the motor speed control circuit) were specially-made by Motorola for Christie/Bob Potts. When they discontinued production of that particular semiconductor (or Christie stopped ordering them, whichever), the AW-1's were effectively dead in the water. Although, and contrary to what Christie told me at the time, I have used off-the-shelf quadracs from Mouser to successfully rebuild dead AW-1 cards. Which reminds me of another great platter by Bob Potts... [drum roll] the Simplex Aero-Matic (SAM)! The air platter. What a noisy, Rube Goldberg hunk o' junk!  |  IP: Logged Ken Layton Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1452 From: Olympia, Wash. USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 08-19-2005 05:59 PM                     Seems to me I also was able to get those semiconductors crossed over to something that worked. This was several years ago.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 08-19-2005 06:31 PM                     Usually a quadrac can be replaced with a diac connected to the gate of a triac and then remember the applied energy platter and its design  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 08-19-2005 07:51 PM                       Didn't need to. There were several flavors of quadracs readily available. Christie just wanted you to believe that the one they used was so special, nothing could replace it. That way, they could sell you a new platter. Heard that song before, huh? Yes, Ken. I think I found the specs to a near-neighbor in an old RCA SK book, picked one from Mouser that was close, and bingo! Worked like a champ. Bought me a handful for a couple of bucks and soon had no more dead cards lying about. I love making the "impossible" happen.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 08-19-2005 08:14 PM                     quote: Tim Reed Bought me a handful for a couple of bucks and soon had no more dead cards lying about. I love making the "impossible" happen. Tim, Shame, Shame on you for fixing those junkers and doing a dis-service to your customers. I dread customers that would even want to repair one of those. They ARE NOT theatre operators. Even a Stupid platter is better than those thangs. I have a customer in Utah that keeps his only AW-2 running... and believe me he is not a theatre operator! The Air Platter was not that bad. One of them still survives running somewhere around the mountain states. Mark  |  IP: Logged Sam D. Chavez Film God Posts: 2153 From: Martinez, CA USA Registered: Aug 2003 posted 08-19-2005 11:28 PM                       Does anyone know what the air platter was called in not so polite circles?  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 08-20-2005 12:24 AM                       quote: Mark Gulbrandsen Shame, Shame on you for fixing those junkers and doing a dis-service to your customers. Mark... heh-heh... who said this was in a theatre? The AW-1 was mine, picked up with a bunch of other stuff from a dead drive-in booth I bought. You know me better than that! Sam... 'the platter that blows'?  |  IP: Logged Ken Layton Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1452 From: Olympia, Wash. USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 08-20-2005 09:59 AM                     Now I remember what it was I used since it was something I already had on hand to repair those boards. It was the triac and diac that I normally use to repair the lamp dimmer circuitry on English Mark Dart 6000 series dart game power supplies. I had tons of them on hand since they were such a high failure item. I remember either buying them at Mouser or Radio Shack Commercial. They didn't cost much at all. I think it was about a buck apiece for the triac and around 60 cents for the diac.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.