my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Victoria 8 gate

Author Topic: Victoria 8 gate Thomas Jonsson Expert Film Handler Posts: 216 From: Bromolla, Sweden Registered: Sep 2003 posted 04-17-2005 12:09 PM                       The Victoria 8 gate is a strange construction. It´s straight with another straight part above it, slightly angled. Does this have the same effect as a curved gate, or does the film behave as if the gate was straight all the way, as for focus as well as steadiness? Thomas  |  IP: Logged John Walsh Film God Posts: 2490 From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way Registered: Oct 1999 posted 04-17-2005 12:17 PM                     I feel it makes the film act as a standard straight gate. To get any on-screen benefit, the curve has to be where the aperture is. I always felt that the curved part at the top only allowed the film to enter the gate a little easier. To have a 'big' projector like a V8 without a curve gate was an oversight, IMHO. I do like V8's, but that was an improvement that should have been done many years ago.  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 04-17-2005 07:55 PM                     The solid piece of aluminum that Cine used for the V-8s were designed to be curved, since tht machine had the double usage of being for the 35/70mm formats. Why of the curved entrance on top is to keep the upper loop rather low being that the upper sprocket is rather close to the trap and allowing the film to enter the trap more smoothly and runs quieter. Plus, with 70mm, a high tight loop puts more stress on the film if the trap was a straight gate variety. 70mm needs the curved gate for better focus and it was carried over to the 35mm traps. Check out the manual section on the V-8 machine and one can notice this in the threading area. -Monte  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-17-2005 10:17 PM                     quote: The solid piece of aluminum that Cine used for the V-8s were designed to be curved, Do you mean the gate plate Monte? Actually its made of steel that has been hard chrome plated, not alumnium. Those plates are over a grand dealer cost these days, its no wonder Shakamecanica has lost favor in the States. I actually always liked the Vic-8 and 10 for 70mm. The Vic 10 uses the larger size sprockets in all three positions for feed and holdback and that does make threading a bit tighter up top. There were two pairs of 8's in the Chicago area for years, both top notch theatres. The picture quality was always better than one thought might happen with a straight gate. Of course 35mm never seemed quite as good as 70. I think the gate blowers in both machines helped somewhat... kind of a reverse Cinefocus thing. The two Vic 8's that I still maintain out here that have got to be 40 plus years old but still run like a champ. One recently lost its Telemecanique motor start/run relay and another needed new shutter bearings but other than that they are basically untouched over the years. Fortunately the oil has alwys gotten changed regularly at this location and that no doubt has contributed to the long life. Mark  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 04-18-2005 12:36 AM                     I thought the "trap" was a solid piece of aluminum-the way the V8's were at the Karcher (in which my friend has now since we stripped out that twin..) Ture, I like the v8's alot better than any simplex out there. - Monte  |  IP: Logged John Walsh Film God Posts: 2490 From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way Registered: Oct 1999 posted 04-18-2005 06:04 AM                     Yes, definitely (stainless) steel, although it does have an aluminum look to it. This is a photo I took to yell at someone about not cleaning. I was told by someone that the brass hooked-shape to hold the gate is/was hand filed to fit each projector, which is why the projector serial number is written on it.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-18-2005 08:17 AM                     quote: Yes, definitely (stainless) steel, Has to be non-magnetic for mag prints! So they are probably type 316 stainless. When the hard chrome plating wears you can actually see the underlying metal. Mark  |  IP: Logged Thomas Jonsson Expert Film Handler Posts: 216 From: Bromolla, Sweden Registered: Sep 2003 posted 04-18-2005 12:07 PM                       If I understand this right, the gate is OK for 70mm but less good for 35mm? This must be the only straight gate for 70mm? So for 35mm, the gate is no better than the straight gate for Victoria 5? Thomas  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-18-2005 04:16 PM                     quote: Thomas Jonsson This must be the only straight gate for 70mm? So for 35mm, the gate is no better than the straight gate for Victoria 5? To answer your questions.... No, The Westrex 35/70 had straight gates. Yes, about the same results on screen. Mark  |  IP: Logged Thomas Jonsson Expert Film Handler Posts: 216 From: Bromolla, Sweden Registered: Sep 2003 posted 04-18-2005 04:35 PM                       Thanks, Mark. I think I recall in one thread someone said Cinemeccanica couldn´t make up their mind wether the gate should be straight or curved - and made it somewhere in between for the Vic 8. The curved gate for the Vic 5 is a crappy construction, but it actually gives a sharper image. Is there ANY projector that works better with a straight gate than a curved? How about Philips FP56 or the Bauer B11 or B14? They are known to produce excellent images, and have straight gates, if I´m not mistaken? Thomas  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 04-18-2005 10:09 PM                     Hi Thomas, I can't answer for lamps opver 2kw on the FP-56 and never actually projected film with the Bauer that I had. I would have to imagine that they put out great images though. The FP-56 certainly does and is dead steady when set up properly. On the 56 one can fit an auxillery air line that blows slightly on the back side of the film to aid in keeping the film cool and stable. Allthe duct work is built into the head for this. I have not tried that feature yet...... The FP-56 is certainly one of the nicest running 35mm machines I've ever worked with and super quiet. Mark  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.