Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Multitasking of employ with projection department (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Multitasking of employ with projection department
Peter John Anthony. C
Film Handler

Posts: 55
From: India
Registered: Jun 2004


 - posted 03-29-2005 05:35 PM      Profile for Peter John Anthony. C   Email Peter John Anthony. C   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dear all can you please let me know that is it a good idea of multitasking staffs to projection & cafe or ushers (Ushers and Cafe guys to be trained in projection & will run projection system)
If yes what is the advantages....
If no what are the disadvantages.....
Staffs of ushers & cafes are non-technical guys.

Our plex till date have a good fame & name, it is one of the best movie experiance plex....

All the suggestion & advice will be very useful to me for our future.
Thanks in advance.
Peter

 |  IP: Logged

Chase Hanson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 172
From: San Diego, CA
Registered: Oct 2004


 - posted 03-29-2005 06:03 PM      Profile for Chase Hanson   Email Chase Hanson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Cross training is a hot topic in most place of employeement.

In this particular scenario there is ONE primary Advantage and ONE primary Disadvantage.

Advantage: Crosstraining employees greatly increases the utility of your employee pool.

Disadvantage: Depending on job complexities, a person crosstrained to perform many tasks may not perform any one of them very well.

What it will basically boil down to is, Do you have a small number of people who are reliable, autonomous with a strong technical sense that you can make into Projectionists. Or do you have a larger number of hard working, bright individuals who you can make into Booth Operators.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard May
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1057
From: Floral Park, NY USA
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 03-29-2005 06:52 PM      Profile for Richard May   Email Richard May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here we go again. Mike , are you there. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 03-29-2005 06:54 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When you are driving an automobile, "multitasking" often causes accidents. Would you want your surgeon to "multitask" while you are on the operating table?

One skilled person running and maintaining a dozen or so projectors is pretty efficient utilization of personnel, such that expecting them to "multitask" as ushers or "cafe guys" on the ground floor is a distraction that will affect presentation quality. Being out of the booth usually has them in the wrong place at the wrong time if a projection or sound problem occurs. By all means, your projection staff should be fully occupied with projection work, which should be more than just threading and pushing buttons in a well-run theatre.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Spaeth
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1129
From: Marietta, GA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 03-29-2005 07:06 PM      Profile for Mike Spaeth   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Spaeth   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Richard-

I don't use ushers or concessionists! I use managers!! [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Jason M Miller
Master Film Handler

Posts: 284
From: Kalamazoo, Michigan, USA
Registered: Jul 2004


 - posted 03-29-2005 09:32 PM      Profile for Jason M Miller   Email Jason M Miller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We have to multi-task employees here, we are a 4 screen and we usually don't have the buisness to staff a projectionist. It works out preatty well, we do have a booth supervisor, which is also a usher but when he works he is mostly in the booth.

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Brown
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 105
From: Fairport, NY, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-29-2005 09:47 PM      Profile for Chris Brown   Author's Homepage   Email Chris Brown   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never really been too big on the whole cross training thing to begin with, for exactly the disadvantage Chase pointed out. I'd rather have a staff of people who really know their position rather than a staff who is just "okay" at each position. I do understand the benefits and practical uses but I've never really liked the concept as a whole.

 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 03-29-2005 10:53 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
This will probably make me seem like an insensitive prick but...

If a theatre isn't doing sufficient business to cover basic costs then it should just close down. I'm sick and tired of theatres that try to improve their bottom line by making cuts instead of figuring out how to improve sales.

 |  IP: Logged

Richard May
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1057
From: Floral Park, NY USA
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 03-29-2005 11:00 PM      Profile for Richard May   Email Richard May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Manny, unfortunately that's what happens. Theaters keep cutting back staff to save money. By doing so, a lot of times they make it worse. Business all depends on the movies you get most of the time.

 |  IP: Logged

Matthew Peters
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 179
From: Glen Waverley, Melbourne, Australia
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 03-29-2005 11:34 PM      Profile for Matthew Peters   Email Matthew Peters   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Like Jason, I work at a 4 screen house where multitasking is the norm.

Just a few nights ago I would have operated all 4 screens, cleaned each cinema and ushered it (real ushering to assigned seats), sold a few tickets and concessions, answered phone calls, broke down part of print… all within a 90 minute period.

But John made a good point, it can be a distraction. It’s often a case of thread-up quick, press go, then start ushering.

Only problem with that is people think that’s all there is to it. I’ve been told off by a floor manager for checking on the equipment. From their point of view the phone was ringing and there was 2 people waiting to be served at the candy bar. Since everyone had been seated I was expected to be back at the front of house straight away. I wanted to do a thorough check of the film path, (which is a little more complex that the standard set-up) even if the show was running.

In a smaller complex (say 1 - 4 screens) multitasking can work pretty well.

 |  IP: Logged

James Faber
Film Handler

Posts: 66
From: Des Moines, Iowa , USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-30-2005 01:34 AM      Profile for James Faber   Author's Homepage   Email James Faber   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I also work at a 4 screen as booth manager, and I have to do a bit of multitasking. I go down and help clean after every set of shows, but it usually isn't too long, 5 minutes maybe because we have a good staff, and I still close concession. Closing concession usually only takes about 20 minutes(once again, due to our kick-ass staff), so I really don't think it's too much to ask. I don't mind doing the work downstairs as long as they let me go back up as soon as everything is finished. I get a little worried when I have to run errands with film going, though. I'm often the one sent to get anything the theater needs, but I don't do it unless there is someone else booth-competent there.

 |  IP: Logged

Monte L Fullmer
Film God

Posts: 8367
From: Nampa, Idaho, USA
Registered: Nov 2004


 - posted 03-30-2005 02:19 AM      Profile for Monte L Fullmer   Email Monte L Fullmer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
..all of this is called a "service orientated work force"-the new trend in this new modern society. See how much one can get as much out of an employee and pay him as little as possible. With this, one can see a "caste" system being developed and in operation very readilly.

One can see multitasking as a form of job security, whereas one can see multitasking, especially in projection, a disaster due to ill-training and ill-operations.

Goodbye to quality. It's a "white collar"/suit world out there who's (thinks that their) ahead of the game.

-Monte

 |  IP: Logged

Tracy Bellar
Film Handler

Posts: 72
From: Sciotoville, Oh.
Registered: Mar 2005


 - posted 03-30-2005 04:54 AM      Profile for Tracy Bellar   Author's Homepage   Email Tracy Bellar   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
unfortunatly some Theater owners force the hand of the managment in this way. They don't see the seperation of jobs. They see every employee as someone to use in any way they see fit. Sometimes someone(Concession worker) could be trained to do the booth and it would be benificial. However, Once they have a little training they think they know enough to take over your job. They don't see the years of experience and can't forsee problems that they may incure and don't know how to deal with. A theater owner that only cares about concession sales would see anyone that knows a little of the booth as qualified enough to do the job like a seasoned projectionist. I hate to have to fix problems that arise because someone didn't know what they were doing and didn't take the time to train to learn what they are doing. Automation and platter systems have ruined the view of what a projectionist really is. If you are not constantly rewinding reels and doing everything manually they think you don't deserve to be paid well and see it as a job anyone can do until something goes wrong then who do they call? To many people don't have enough experience and training an consider themselves to be an operator/Projectionist.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Hajducki
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 500
From: Edinburgh, UK
Registered: May 2003


 - posted 03-30-2005 06:40 AM      Profile for Mark Hajducki   Email Mark Hajducki   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The problem with most smaller cinemas is that the peek demands in most sections coincide. (The box office is busiest before a show starts which is when consessions has the most customers, the theatre needs cleaned and the projector threded). After this there is another quiet period untill the next showtime.

The larger multiscreens get round this by having enough steady work in all the departments.

One system I have heard of (never seen in action though) is combining consessions with the box office (combined software is avaliable) which could reduce your staffing at quiet times.

The main problem with staffing to the the lowest limit is having an unplanned busy period (or other crisis).

 |  IP: Logged

Richard May
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1057
From: Floral Park, NY USA
Registered: Aug 2004


 - posted 03-30-2005 08:10 AM      Profile for Richard May   Email Richard May   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have seen how it works when you combine cocession with the box office. Personally, I don't want to buy my tickets at the candy stand. A lot of people don't want to wait until you finish serving popcorn to someone in order to get your ticket. I work at a quad and everyone's job is separate. There is 1 manager and 1 assistant manager on at all times. 1 person in the box office, 2 behind the candy stand and 2 to 3 ushers on the floor. 1 person in the booth. We are open 12 hours a day, every day of the year. If we started multitasking and cutting staff, we would lose business. Customers would not stand for the decrease in the quality of service.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.