Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Emulsion pulls off base

   
Author Topic: Emulsion pulls off base
Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-10-2005 10:02 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have come across this problem in the past, but never to this extent. The print of THE INNOCENTS, incept code ^ [] ^ which is 1984 -- so it's not exactly a new print, has a condition where the emulsion pulls right off the base like it isn't even attached as you try to remove splicing tape. In other words, it sticks to the splicing tape stronger than to the base. Not only does it come off clean and completely, but it will actually peel emulsion off beyond the splice, so you could easily ruin two or three frames at a time if you treat it like a normal print. What is going on?

Is there any remedy to this condition -- other than never removing splices? It will quickly become a junk print if each time it is spliced for platter or LP a frame or two is lost at each joint.

Can it somehow be treated to reverse this condition? The only alternative that I could think of (if a chemical treatment of some kind is not available) would be to use prepunched splicing tape and apply a length of say 3 or 4 inches at the end and beginning of each reel at the leader joints. This way when doing normal print buildup and breakdown, splicing tape will be applied to the underlying longer lenght of protective tape and not to the emulsion; when a splice is broken and the tape is pulled off, it will be pulled off the protective tape below rather than being pulled directly off the emulsion itself. That should work until someone trys to peel off the protective tape layer and rips off 4 inches of emulsion!

It is a shame too because the film is a good one, THE INNOCENTS, and I can't imagine Criterion has more than one or two prints, which may also exhibit this problem. Once this print is gone, it will be a cold day in hell before anyone strikes a new one.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan M. Crist
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 531
From: Hershey, PA, USA
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 01-10-2005 10:15 AM      Profile for Jonathan M. Crist   Email Jonathan M. Crist   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I own an IB tech print of The Greatest Show On Earth from 1952. The same sort of thing happened with my Greatest Show print. For no apparent reason portions of the emulsion would just separate from the base. This would occur with large sections - no splicing tape - the emulsion just literally fell off. Sadly this print is now essentially worthless. [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-10-2005 10:20 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I suspect the triacetate film base may have degraded due to improper storage (warm/humid causing beginning of "vinegar syndrome"), so the bond between the emulsion and support was weakened. To prevent further hydrolysis, store the film cool, dry and vented. If sealed cans are used, Molecular Sieves will adsorb any excess moisture or acids in the enclosed storage container.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 01-10-2005 04:38 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
I've seen this a lot with black and white prints, even from the 90s. I remember handling 3 different prints of Schindler's List and on all 3 of them the emulsion peeled when I was breaking them down. I peeled the tape anyway and tried to ensure it didn't peel the emulsion into the next picture, but any way you slice it the next guy had to chop a frame off on the next build. The worst tape was Hudson Photographic (aka: QuickSplice) and to a minor extent Neumade.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 01-10-2005 05:08 PM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I had the same problem with "Schindler's List", when it opened. Technicolor & Universal kept sending new Show Prints over to find out the problem. I ended up with 9 prints for two screens. Technicolor had us try this stuff called Tomacoat on a few of the prints. That stuff was very wicked [thumbsdown] [thumbsdown]

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-10-2005 05:36 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've never seen this issue with color prints (Eastman or IB), but it's definitely an issue with B&W prints. William Hooper has pointed this out as well. When shipping out B&W prints from platter houses, I always single-side splice on the base side to avoid causing the next theatre to lose another frame.

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-11-2005 02:10 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It only seems to be an issue with b&w US prints since the 1990s. I don't recall having the problem running foreign b&w prints or rep prints struck earlier than the 90s. So I'd ascribe it to a modern domestic b&w print production/process defect. There was a print of Roman Holiday that was a terror of "please stop, please stop" emulsion peeling, & whoever had it before plainly was struggling to deal with it also. Some areas where the emulsion had detached in the middle of a frame & torn off they'd colored black with a Sharpie or something, then covered/protected the emulsion abscess with a splat of splicing tape - the alternative of cutting frames would have been huge loss, a choppy print, & likely just worsening the emulsion peeling when the film was cut.

It's nightmarish at heads & tails that have been cut & spliced & must be repaired - peeling splices takes the emulsion with it. The best you can do is be very slow & delicate, attack the splice adhesive first by working at the edges with lighter fluid, & only peel starting on the end of the tape *away* from the cut & peel toward the cut. The emulsion will likely start popping off anyway at the cut when you get the tape off, has to be carefully positioned back down on the base as the splice is made, & the splice pretty much then just braces the emulsion on its side as the physical join & strength is made via the tape on the base side. The next time the leaders, tails, & splices are peeled must be cut at a platter house, there'll be more damage & loss.

quote: Frank Angel
It is a shame too because the film is a good one, THE INNOCENTS
I know that was one jittery, massively creeped-out audience walking out of your theatre! Good movie, lucky you!

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Douglass
Film Handler

Posts: 7
From: Hopewell Junction NY
Registered: Dec 2003


 - posted 01-11-2005 02:54 AM      Profile for Brian Douglass   Email Brian Douglass   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm wondering if you applied some Kodak Fixer to it, if it would coat the emulsion from coming off. I know that when I develop 16mm and 35mm, if it's not fixed all the way, you can take the emulsion off with your finger nail.

But if the print is in and out, maybe you wouldn't want to go through all the trouble.

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 01-11-2005 05:41 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Do you mean while the film's still wet, or after it's dried? Fixing as such won't stop the emulsion coming off, but some fixers do contain a hardener, usually potassium alum I think, to reduce the chances of emulsion damage during handling while wet. For still films it's generally recommended to use a non-hardening fixer these days. I don't know if a hardening fixer is still used for motion picture films.

 |  IP: Logged

Brian Douglass
Film Handler

Posts: 7
From: Hopewell Junction NY
Registered: Dec 2003


 - posted 01-11-2005 04:25 PM      Profile for Brian Douglass   Email Brian Douglass   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is! I actually used some developing some Motion Picture Film in my basement.

I couldn't hurt to try it. I think you can order some at www.bhphotovideo.com for like, $3.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.