my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Rectifiers

Author Topic: Rectifiers Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 11-29-2004 03:56 AM                     Question on recifiers: Which are better, or are they the same like 6 of 1, 1/2 dozen of the other: The Strong transistor "switchers", or the CHR traditional voltage tap switching transformers, and diode usage variety? I've played with both and actually prefer the CHR variety being of the "old school" type of rectifier using pos/neg diodes. Just seems like CHR's put out a more stable light current and bulbs last longer. But, just wondering. thx-Monte  |  IP: Logged Jeff Taylor Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 601 From: Chatham, NJ/East Hampton, NY Registered: Apr 2000 posted 11-29-2004 09:18 AM                     To a large extent it's like asking if you prefer blondes or brunettes. High reactance rectifiers were the standard and have the benefit of simplicity and user-serviceability. On the other hand they're big, heavy, hot, inefficient, and can be noisy. Switchers had a reliability gripe initially but have largely settled in, and are compact, relatively cool, and efficient, but not user serviceable. As you said, 6 of one, 1/2 dozen of the other.  |  IP: Logged Thomas King Expert Film Handler Posts: 119 From: Sheffield, Yorkshire, England Registered: Oct 2004 posted 11-30-2004 06:54 AM                        Agreed. Non-switching rectifiers, while being reliable and indestructable (all that will be left of our proj. box after nuclear war will be the rectifier and the IBM keyboard) are large. When fiddling with ours the other day (the panel switch had died naturally, and I wanted to tighten the transformer bolts to quieten it down a bit) I found out that it actually is sunk a foot and a half into the floor. Certainly switched power supplies have more to go wrong, but our tech said that about dolby digital when we got that installed  |  IP: Logged Richard May Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1057 From: Floral Park, NY USA Registered: Aug 2004 posted 11-30-2004 07:23 AM                     I would say that the switcher is the way to go. As a tech, I have run into very few problems with them. They are much easier to carry around (especially for use on a portable setup). I had some problems with the older ones, but they have worked the bugs out with them.  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-30-2004 07:50 AM                     One thing I have found is that plex's equipped with switchers really need to have full panel surge protectors at eah panel in the booth. Plex's we've done this way have had zero switcher failures. Mark @ CLACO  |  IP: Logged Pete Naples Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1565 From: Dunfermline, Scotland Registered: Feb 2001 posted 12-01-2004 11:39 AM                     Switchers cost you less in power as they are more efficient, true the early ones were somewhat tempramental, but the recent ones I've dealt with from Strong have been behaving themselves thus far. They are a heck of a lot more compact than most rectifiers, having said that the Christie unit found in the bottom of their consoles is quite compact considering it's output, it is HEAVY though!  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 12-01-2004 03:43 PM                     Yep, 100 plus LBS for a Christie, whereas a 20LB suitcase for the newer "Switchers" - no comparison.  |  IP: Logged Jon Miller Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 973 From: San Diego, CA, USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 12-01-2004 07:57 PM                     So how do those monster standalone IREM rectifiers -- the ones with the "steering wheel" current control -- compare weightwise to Christies of comparable output?  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 12-01-2004 08:28 PM                     Generally lot heavier. It takes alot more iron to build the movable core type transformers. Mark  |  IP: Logged Monte L Fullmer Film God Posts: 8367 From: Nampa, Idaho, USA Registered: Nov 2004 posted 12-02-2004 01:10 AM                     Yep, packing IREM's downstairs from a booth where the theatre's closed down, ain't an easy chore. Granted, Strong with the "suitcases" won this war.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.