Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » What is 'plate glass'? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: What is 'plate glass'?
Nate Lehrke
Master Film Handler

Posts: 396
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 08-14-2004 03:15 AM      Profile for Nate Lehrke   Email Nate Lehrke   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is the difference between 'glass' and 'plate glass'?
What would you use the 'plate glass' for?

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-14-2004 03:25 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Making plates, obviously!

In the theater world, there is usually plate glass and then there is the more expensive optical glass. Optical glass is of a much higher quality and allows more light to pass though. This is used usually on projection port windows. Many theaters unfortunately use plate glass for this port though, because the money men simply don't care about the highest quality possible.

Click here and look at the 3rd picture down and you'll see the difference clearly.

 |  IP: Logged

Nate Lehrke
Master Film Handler

Posts: 396
From: Denver, CO
Registered: Oct 2002


 - posted 08-14-2004 03:38 AM      Profile for Nate Lehrke   Email Nate Lehrke   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Okay, wow, that picture certainly helps.

What is the price difference for a standard port window between optical glass & plate glass?

Does optical glass stay cleaner? Would my eye glasses have optical glass?

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-14-2004 07:21 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Optical quality glass has fewer internal defects that might scatter light, reducing contrast. It is coated to tighter tolerances for thickness, so it is perfectly flat and won't distort the light going through it. It does not contain impurities that may give it coloration (cheaper glass is often slightly green in color). Glass used for projection ports should have anti-reflection coatings, that reduce the amount of light reflected at the surfaces -- less light reflected means less light "bouncing around" within the glass (less flare), and more light on the screen (less reflected back toward the projector).

You often see terms like "water white" (little coloration), the percentage of reflection (the lower the better) or the percentage transmission (the higher the better) in the specs.

Obviously, all these improvements add to the cost, but it is well worth it.

Contrast Killers

quote:
Contrast Killer 5: Poor Ports
The projection port is just as important as the lens in delivering high-quality
images. Plain window glass should not be used. Only optical quality glass with
anti-reflection coatings should be used. Port glass should never be installed
perpendicular to the projection beam, to avoid reflecting light back into the
projector lens. Likewise, if two panes of port glass are needed for sound
isolation, care should be taken to avoid internal re-reflection. Soundproof,
angled port glass frames are available from several vendors. Port glass should
be absolutely clean and scratch-free. As with the projection lenses, loose dust
should be gently brushed away with a camels-hair lens brush, and liquid lens
cleaner and lens tissue used for cleaning any haze. Ideally, the projected
image should be almost invisible on the port glass, with no detectable
scratches or haze.

http://www.cinemaequipmentsales.com/dolby9.html

quote:
Regardless of the wall structure, projector noise will escape through any single sheet of projection glass. port glasses should be angled to reduce lateral reflections; as a worst case example, internal reflections from a single port glass set at 900 to the line from lens to screen will result in numerous reflections leading to a soft screen image apparently out-of-focus. A good result will be a front glass set at perhaps 70 forward from the lens angle, and a rear (auditorium side) glass set at 150 backwards.

Care should be taken over the quality of glass used, and optimum projection requires coating to further avoid internal reflections. (3)


http://www.opticalcoatings.com/projection.htm

quote:
Our port window glass is called Water White. The transmission rate is between 98% and 99%. The glass transmits 99% < 3mm thick, 98% > 6mm thick of the visible spectrum. For more details on the specs see our Water White glass page. Standard port window glass thickenss is 6mm. We have 8mm and 10mm available as well, with 12mm available in the winter of 2001.
This glass is ideal for use in theater projection rooms, in what are called port windows. The dual A/R Coating increases the transmissivity to provide true color through the glass. This is the highest clarity port window glass, with no coloration. The port glass in the projection room is nearly invisible.

Regular glass absorbs the colors and brightness of projected light, thus dulling the screen image. Optical Coatings' specially coated glass transmits more light onto the projection screen. Movies are seen the way the Director and Cinematographer intended - with brighter, truer colors.

Our high transmission, two-sided antireflective coated clear glass is suitable for use in motion picture projection room construction. Our glass is especially suitable for multiple projectors, such as those in IMAX theaters, where every bit of light transmission is critical.


http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/superpanatar-c.htm

quote:
By the same token that it is imperative to use only the finest objective lens in connection with the SUPER PANATAR, it is quite important that only the best grade of glass be used in the projection port. The glass should be water-white, optically flawless, coated, and should be treated with the same care as a lens. If these precautions are not taken, the port glass can introduce loss of definition, loss of light transmission, and a detrimental change of color in the projected image.
http://www.portwindowglass.com/

quote:
Water white, low iron, ultra clear glass transmits 98% to 99% of light, and is anti-glare and ant-reflective coated. This glass is preferred for all theater technology, and is necessary for digital equipment. Water White Glass allows lower intensity light to be passed through the port. Used as a theater glass, our water white glass outperforms other ultra clear products. We use a process that insures defect free glass.
American Computer Optic's OptiClear Water White Glass is the port window glass of choice for Christie Digital Labs and THX Labs. Thicknesses are available in 3mm, 6mm and 10mm. Water White Glass under 3mm thick transmits 99% of visible light, while over 3mm thick transmits 98% of visible light. Sheets are available up to 6ft X 8ft. Use our contact form to request a quote. Please include size and thickness specifications.

Water white glass is available as tempered product. Hydrophobic coating is also available to repel dust, dirt, water and oil build-up.



 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-14-2004 07:31 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ahem...now to answer the question that was actually asked.

Ordinary glass is (or was) simply extruded and rolled. Plate glass is polished and ground to be more perfectly flat. Float glass is made by floating the glass across liquid tin to achieve a very flat surface without the expense of grinding the surfaces. That may have replaced ground plate glass in many instances; perhaps it has superceded cheap rolled glass as well.

I presume optical quality glass, besides being a more transparent composition, is still ground for flatness and nowadays would be given coatings similar to that found on modern lenses.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-14-2004 01:13 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Plate glass would probably cost very little depending on the size. Our projector port is only 12x12" so it would be dirt cheap.

That port had plate glass in it originally, and we replaced it with optical glass several years ago. It cost around $50 for just the glass. It did make a big difference.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-14-2004 01:50 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Has anyone ever done any scientific testing/comparisons between coated optical (white water) glass and Lexan? Years ago an installer claimed that Lexan was cheaper because it was easier to cut to odd sizes (which our ports are) but, although it is not coated and does have some internal reflections (the edges light up brighter than optical glass showing that it has internal flare), it is pure in terms of color transmission and distortion free. We have been using it for years but it is time to replace -- the surfaces will eventually get very fine scratches in it no matter how careful one is about cleaning it.

But the same problem exists in that our ports are not sized to the standard port glass/frame assemblies so we have get our odd sizes custom framed and cut, and expensive proposition. Lexan just goes on a bandsaw and it's done.

Should we look into biting the nonprofit bullet and getting custom port windows made or go with the plastic? I could buy new pieces of Lexan every year until I retire and it won't cost as much as custom designed frames and glass. Plus, because of our steep angle, we also don't need any fancy angled frame -- we just drill four holes in the Lexan and it screws flat onto the port frame -- the angle of the lens-to-Lexan is already present by virtue of the projector angle.

Optical glass? Lexan?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-14-2004 06:43 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Optical glass...I've never liked the look of the plastic stuff. Call your Schneider dealer...you have custom sized glass with optical coatings. Note too that Goldberg can also provide custom sized optical glass that is coated. It is normally more expensive than Schneider but it is also clearer.

PPG starfire is my favorite "clear" glass there is almost no hint of green (iron) in it.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-14-2004 09:50 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve,
I thought I'd post this link and the correct spelling for this product for those that might be interested in using it...... This is probably the least expensive optical quality glass available and is stocked by many PPG dealers in most large cities.

http://www.ppg.com/gls_commercial/starphire/default.htm

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-14-2004 11:37 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is it appropriate to call it optical quality if it's not ground? (Let alone coated.)

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-15-2004 12:38 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've always thought of it as having superior optical qualities given the price of it. The main thing is to stick with the thinnest 2.5mm Starphire so refraction is kept to a minimum. Its certainly an inexpensive prefered alternative to plastic and plate glass. and it can be coated by any optical coating plant with large enough chambers if one wants to have that done, have also had it dip coated with excellent results. I used to stock it in the Midwest days in dip coated sheets of various standard porthole sizes and some of that was what was in the "Hughes booths" and many others we did. Today we generally sell the Schneider stuff because of the overall high quality of Schneider products in general and because its convenient.
Have had problems several times in the past with Goldberg slipping in plate glass where optical quality was ordered so I generally stay away from them all together for this important part.

I recently ran across some plastic port material in Nevada in which the auditorium side of the plastic had apparently been etched by something in the air over the seven years of its operation. The on screen images suffered as a result needless to say......
Mark @ CLACO

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Langfield
Master Film Handler

Posts: 280
From: Prospect, NSW, Australia
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-15-2004 05:34 AM      Profile for Bill Langfield   Author's Homepage   Email Bill Langfield   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hmm, all very interesting, so now I want to try and figure what port glass we are using.

How would I know the diffence between a 'slab of glass', 'rolled and polished glass', 'floated glass', 'optical glass', 'optical glass - coated in anti-reflect' Oh you get it,all those glass things that were mentioned.

The companies I work for would straight away change to best stuff if turns out the best is not place already.

The joint that fired me would not give a shit. They just cared about how many up-sized popcorn/cokes they could sell.

Bill.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-15-2004 08:05 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks for the correction on the spelling...I don't think I've seen a better glass than PPG Starphire that has anti-reflective coatings applied. I don't see any waves and the stuff is quite clear.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Matthew Peters
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 179
From: Glen Waverley, Melbourne, Australia
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 08-15-2004 09:47 AM      Profile for Matthew Peters   Email Matthew Peters   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote: Bill Langfield
They just cared about how many up-sized popcorn/cokes they could sell.

Hoyts?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-15-2004 10:04 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't know if Starphire is a plate glass product or float glass. Since they seem to be talking about an entirely different composition of the glass itself maybe it is available both ways although maybe if it's not a plate glass then perhaps the same material sold in that form is given a different name.

Then again, maybe they can make the float glass just as accurate as ground plate glass. Isn't there some way to test a glass for flatness...interferiometry or something like that?

Certainly the very best would be a plate glass made of material of Starphire clarity (or maybe Starphire is indeed plate) and given a good coating.

On the issue of clarity, for those who think ordinary glass is clear, just look at the edge and how opaque it is after even a short distance. Then consider fiber optic cable which must be clear enough for the signal to pass through thousands of meters of glass. So it should be no surprise that it is indeed possible to make glass much clearer than the common variety. Thus, Starphire and perhaps competitive products from other firms.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.