my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Lens extension tubes

Author Topic: Lens extension tubes Peter Mork Expert Film Handler Posts: 181 From: Newton, MA, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 06-05-2004 01:50 AM                     Something I've often wondered about - what's the optical effect of adding extension tubes between lens elements? Some projectors require them, where for instance a fat scope element blocks the lens from being inserted far enough to acheive focus; adding a 3-inch tube lets you do this. Other projectors don't need the tubes. I can't see a dime's worth of difference between the extended/unextended versions, but surely...? 50 words or less, go easy on the obscure jargon please. Thanks.  |  IP: Logged Dan Lyons Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 698 From: Seal Beach, CA Registered: Sep 2002 posted 06-05-2004 02:46 AM                     quote: Some projectors require them, where for instance a fat scope element blocks the lens from being inserted far enough to acheive focus; Really? what make of projector and how short a throw for that to happen?  |  IP: Logged Peter Mork Expert Film Handler Posts: 181 From: Newton, MA, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 06-05-2004 10:44 AM                     Brenkert BX-100 (and I suspect other old Brenkert models).  |  IP: Logged Tim Reed Better Projection Pays Posts: 5246 From: Northampton, PA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 06-05-2004 10:51 PM                       If you go very far with it (like ridiculously far... 8-10 inches or so), you'll start to notice the effect of extending the focal length of the backup lens (picture gets smaller on the screen). But it's very minute.  |  IP: Logged John Walsh Film God Posts: 2490 From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way Registered: Oct 1999 posted 06-06-2004 10:24 AM                     I asked Schneider about this. They said the two lenses (the prime and the anamorphic adapter) should be as close as possible. But, if you have to do what's necessary to make things work. Have you projected some test film (35PA) and checked for problems? In a perfect world, I suppose the 'right' thing to do would be to purchase an integrated anamorphic, which does not flare out to a larger diameter, like regular anamorphics. Unless your problem is the -image- hits the edge of the projector head, like short lenses installed in a AA-II.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-06-2004 03:43 PM                     With long focal length back ups I usually add enough extensions so that the image coming out the anamorph is occupying most of its front element because then ideally any glass imperfections would represent a smaller aprt of the image percentage  |  IP: Logged Paul G. Thompson The Weenie Man Posts: 4718 From: Mount Vernon WA USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 06-06-2004 04:09 PM                     As long as there is no vignetting present, I don't think it is too big of a deal. I don't like to have them take up as much area as Gordon does, but if you have a good quality late model lens, Gordon's suggestion will work just fine. If you are using those old 40-year old lenses, forget it. Otherwise, there just might be much spherical and chromatic aberrations that could be easily detected by the eye.  |  IP: Logged Peter Mork Expert Film Handler Posts: 181 From: Newton, MA, USA Registered: Jun 2002 posted 06-07-2004 01:28 AM                     Hmm, Tim, now that you mention it - when setting up a scope lens for my Century, I usually just screw the back element directly to the anamorphic. But last week I took the Brenkert lens, with ann extender in the middle, and used it in the Century - hello, what's this? My perfect aperture plate is now casting shadows. Your "shrinkage" comment would explain why.  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 06-07-2004 01:38 AM                     Watch what happens when you swap out a Strong lamphouse with a Christie. Due to the way the bulb is focused past the film plane, the aperture starts to show.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 06-07-2004 09:16 AM                     Most people tend to forget that the lamphouse is part of the optical system and it can cause changes in image magnification, focus and apperture shadow and lens efficiency and sharpness  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.