Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Cleaning Cart vs Cleaning Stuff at every projector (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Cleaning Cart vs Cleaning Stuff at every projector
Chris Medley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 180
From: McKinney, TX, USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 02-07-2004 08:43 PM      Profile for Chris Medley   Author's Homepage   Email Chris Medley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I am faced with the more efficent option of having cleaning supplies at every projector or having the more cost effective "cleaning cart"....which would you choose and why? I'm at a 14 screen and i require my staff to do a fair amount of daily cleaning on each projector.

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Olpin
Chop Chop!

Posts: 1852
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 02-07-2004 08:50 PM      Profile for Mike Olpin   Email Mike Olpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We have a little bit of both.

In the "bin" at each projector is the following:
1. Lense Tissue
2. Bottle of lense cleaner
3. cup full of Q-Tips
4. Paintbrush
5. toothbrush
6. rag

Then, in a central location we have
1. GlassCleaner
2. 409
3. Film-guard
4. Paper Towels
5. Box of additional rags

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-07-2004 08:55 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Shop rag and toothbrush at each projector, the rest in a centralized location. Assuming you are running film cleaners, you probably won't even touch the rag or toothbrush but maybe once a week.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-07-2004 11:24 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lens tissue and lens cleaner at each projector makes me fearful that the lenses are being cleaned too often. And the prospect that they actually need it is even scarier. The best thing you can do with a lens is to never touch it except blowing dust off of it.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 02-08-2004 02:03 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What Steve said: "Lens tissue and lens cleaner at each projector makes me fearful that the lenses are being cleaned too often."

Also the same concern for Q-tips(tm): don't clean the optical sound without doing a Dolby alignment.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Zeiner
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 146
From: Windsor, CT USA
Registered: Sep 2003


 - posted 02-08-2004 01:03 PM      Profile for Matt Zeiner   Email Matt Zeiner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Also the same concern for Q-tips(tm): don't clean the optical sound without doing a Dolby alignment
umm...why? Assuming your last A-chain was done with clean optics, then all mechanical and electronic failures aside, dirty optics will always stand in the way of good reproduction...

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Olpin
Chop Chop!

Posts: 1852
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 02-08-2004 03:17 PM      Profile for Mike Olpin   Email Mike Olpin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lenses are cleaned once a week. All projectionists are trained how to do this properly.

Same goes for the soundhead. Since we started regularly cleaning them, the analog sound quality has improved.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-08-2004 03:47 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why is the booth so dirty that your lenses need to be cleaned weekly?

No need to use the lens cleaner and lens paper that often. It should be sufficient to blow the dust off with a blower brush (available at camera stores; do _not_ use compressed air!). For the most part, the lens paper and lens cleaner fluid should be saved for cleaning off fingerprints and such, especially if you have newer (1960s and later) lenses which are coated (the coating can be removed with excessive cleaning).

In a multiplex, I vote for having a shop rag and toothbrush next to every machine. A central compressed air system (or, better yet, vacuum) is nice to have, too. Sprockets, gates, and traps should be cleaned between every show (with exceptions for theatres using FG).

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-08-2004 04:17 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"The best thing you can do with a lens is to never touch it except blowing dust off of it."
_________________________________________________________________

Ouch! Thats a Bozo no-no!

Of course this is the equivelent of sandblasting a lens(literally). When I did lens repair at Canon USA we were taught to never blow off a lens with air. Large debris was removed first with a camels hair brush and then we used Kimwipes lightly wound around and slightly overhanging the end of a large tweezers. This was dipped into a solution of 40% MEk and 60 percent denatured alcohol. This is done in a circular motion starting from the center and working out and does require some practice to do it right. I still do it this way today and a lens can end up looking like new and is spotless and void of any dust for at lesat a while. If you ahev alot of elements to clean the MEK gives you a great high as a side bonus [beer] . Ah yes the gold ole days at Canon when they made fine lenses and cameras....but no longer.

Mark @ CLACO

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Medley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 180
From: McKinney, TX, USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 02-09-2004 01:57 PM      Profile for Chris Medley   Author's Homepage   Email Chris Medley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark,

Is there a reason for the MEK/Alch. Mix?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-10-2004 09:23 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Chris,
I believe the MEK helped it all to evaporate at an even rate...quite rapidly actually...also so there were no water droplets left behind fomr the alcohol. I never asked them about their proprietary mixture but if one just uses alcohol it leaves somewhat of a mess on the glass.

Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Chris Medley
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 180
From: McKinney, TX, USA
Registered: Jan 2004


 - posted 02-10-2004 11:03 AM      Profile for Chris Medley   Author's Homepage   Email Chris Medley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
thanks for all your input

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-10-2004 09:07 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Lens Cleaning:

http://www.schneideroptics.com/info/white_papers/lens_cleaning.pdf

Be careful when using MEK -- it will dissolve some materials, especially plastics and adhesives. [Eek!] Likewise acetone.

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-11-2004 12:12 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Be careful when using MEK
It's also regulated as a carcinogen, & as having an inhalation toxicity of HIGH.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-11-2004 06:47 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
MSDS for Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK):

http://www.astrochemicals.com/10080.pdf

http://www.2spi.com/catalog/msds/msds02850.html

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.