Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Dolby CAT150E (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Dolby CAT150E
Michael Harlow
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 170
From: Faversham, Kent, UK
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 12-07-2003 11:16 AM      Profile for Michael Harlow   Email Michael Harlow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ok, That Peter Hall at Future Projection is going to put a CAT150E card in my CP55. What does a CAT150E do?

Peter hasn't come back to me yet, he's a busy man!

Thanks

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-07-2003 11:25 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Cat. 150E is the second to last version of the Cat. 150 card line. The Cat. 150 is the matrix decode (aka 2:4 decoder) in analog Dolby Cinema Processors ending with the CP-65. The Cat. 150F replaced it for cinema use but the Cat. 150E is still current for the Pro-Audio SDU4 deocder due to its increased dynamic range (pro audio is referenced to +4dBu as opposed to Dolby's 300 or 500mV "standard.")

Your CP-55 should already have a Cat 150 of some vintage (the CP-55 started life with the Cat 150C...a B with LEDs) unless it was a CP-55M in which case there is a Cat. 327A in there now.

In short the Cat. 150E (or F) will either repair any matrix decoding problems you may have or improve the quality of the decoding you may have.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Michael Harlow
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 170
From: Faversham, Kent, UK
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 12-07-2003 03:46 PM      Profile for Michael Harlow   Email Michael Harlow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Many thanks for explaining that Steve, He is going to mod our CP55 for split surround so i guess this has something to do with it. [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-07-2003 04:05 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Cat. 150E has no bearing on the split surrounds. You will be getting a Cat. 441 though that will add the Rs channel and a cheesy EQ.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

John McConnel
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 118
From: Okmulgee, OK USA
Registered: Nov 2003


 - posted 12-07-2003 05:22 PM      Profile for John McConnel   Author's Homepage   Email John McConnel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Does optical sound offer split surrounds now?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-07-2003 06:10 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-08-2003 01:54 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not unless you run it through a stereo synthesizer like we do...heh heh.

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Hall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 314
From: London, UK
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 12-10-2003 12:26 AM      Profile for Peter Hall   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Hall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi -

The "E" stands for "extremely good value" ! Your CP55 has a cat150D in it (ot maybe a B, in which case you will notice a hell of a change), which is fine but no where near as defined as the 150E. The E uses chips, in general the D uses Caps. (Well, sort of anyway) but the E sounds a lot better. Thought I'd bring one down and loan it to you for LOTR - as we're putting surround in I didnt want the initial response to the surrounds to be restricted by the performance of the card..

Is a blatant marketing ploy by our good selves - once you've heard the E you wont want to go back to the D. Sort of like making syre the car you take for a test drive has leather seats !!
See you tomorrow

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-10-2003 09:29 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The D still makes use of the older Tate chips
The E uses the Sanyo Prologic chip driving a pair of external VCA's the phillips TDA1074's
Also the D uses an analogue bucket brigade time delay the E and later does the dealy in dsp

 |  IP: Logged

Peter Hall
Master Film Handler

Posts: 314
From: London, UK
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 12-10-2003 10:00 AM      Profile for Peter Hall   Author's Homepage   Email Peter Hall   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gordon -

You are far cleverer than I !! No wonder Stuart speaks so well of you !!

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 12-10-2003 10:04 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is the E fully DSP or just the surround? Is there no escape from this digital madness? [evil] How do they implement 2:4 decoding on the Panastereo?

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-10-2003 10:19 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The time delay is the only dsp section on the 150e
The Panastereo and most other matrixs use descrete components to do the logic steering
They have also one of the cleaverest ways around the VCA issues as well

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-10-2003 10:45 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
When was the change from the delay being on a separate card attached to the decoder card to it all being on a single card made? Was that when the delay went digital?

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-10-2003 12:13 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The 150E was the first single card decoder
The 150F use the analogue devices single chip set (same as in the cp45) and it has lower headroom than the 150E so not advised for Printmasters

As to the split surround issue the circle surround matrix can handle a split surround optical as could the original pentoptical card design (hence the pent for 5 channel)

The vector corrodinates of the matrix can be altered to get any channel position you want but channel seperation degrades the farther you are from opposing channels being 180 degrees apart

 |  IP: Logged

Christopher Seo
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 530
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-10-2003 12:34 PM      Profile for Christopher Seo   Email Christopher Seo   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Very interesting, Gordon. So was split surround ever actually utilized for optical? Does this have anything to do with Dolby's Pro-Logic II?

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.