Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Crap Code on LOTR:FOTR(SE) - wtf? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Crap Code on LOTR:FOTR(SE) - wtf?
Paul Linfesty
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1383
From: Bakersfield, CA, USA
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-06-2003 10:27 PM      Profile for Paul Linfesty   Email Paul Linfesty   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An entire REEL ruined with those pesky red dots.

Why? Why? Why?

This SE has already been out on VHS (very copyable)and DVD (somewhat copyable) for MORE THAN A YEAR! And the SE is CURRENTLY showing on STARZ Movie Channel! So WHO THE HELL is going to go to the trouble to PIRATE this new print???

 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 12-06-2003 10:32 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Don't you understand, piracy has become a sport.

The crap code will win this match, by default, since nobody's going to bother pirating it.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-08-2003 11:24 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It would be a good question to ask someone at New Line. I assume that no one thought about the fact that it was already out and just proceded with their machine-like habitual CAPcoding.

Incidently, the print I saw had a lot of negative hair and ocasionally strange black splotches on the left edge of the image. Did anyone else see these (outside of Boston)?

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-08-2003 11:37 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think John is probably right. They are just doing it because that's what they always do and they'll be damned if they put any thought into the process.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 12-08-2003 11:58 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
jhawk wrote:

quote:
Incidently, the print I saw had a lot of negative hair and ocasionally strange black splotches on the left edge of the image. Did anyone else see these (outside of Boston)?


Occasional blotches along the left side of the image are usually due to accidental "bleeding" or spashing of the soundtrack redeveloper, a problem that will be eliminated with the conversion to cyan dye analog soundtracks. [Smile]

New Line usually uses another manufacturer's print film. [Frown]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 12-08-2003 04:20 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The prints stated that they were on Fuji stock. The lowering of quality will be what any conversion to cyan will bring...now conversion to digital projection will eliminate the other anomolies. Of course...new digitally perfect artifacts will replace them.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-08-2003 04:25 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think it was soundtrack developer; they were opaque blotches that were only present for a frame or so, and they had no purple tinge to them.

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-08-2003 04:45 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes Red Square Pixel Cap Codes is the digetal improvement [Big Grin]

 |  IP: Logged

Jim Leko
Film Handler

Posts: 90
From: Redondo Beach, CA, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 12-09-2003 12:33 AM      Profile for Jim Leko   Email Jim Leko   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
American Cinematographer: The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers

quote:

TECHNICAL SPECS

Super 35mm 2.35:1

Arriflex, Moviecam and Mitchell cameras

Zeiss and Angenieux lenses

Kodak EXR 50D 5245, Vision 200T 5293, Vision 500T 5279, SO 214

Digital Intermediate
Scanning/Recording by Weta Digital
Digital Film Grading by The PostHouse AG

Printed on Fuji 3513D

I saw FOTR today, and I was upset with the CRAP codes as well. The Extended Edition of FOTR has been on DVD for almost 14 months. You can get a pirated copy online that will look much better than anything that could be ripped off from within a theater. The first few reels seemed ok. Then all of the sudden, it was shock and awe. They were everywhere.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 12-09-2003 02:10 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"They were everywhere."

Really? I didn't see them until reel 9. Was the coded reel variable?

--jhawk

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 12-09-2003 10:51 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
jhawk wrote:

quote:
I don't think it was soundtrack developer; they were opaque blotches that were only present for a frame or so, and they had no purple tinge to them.

When the soundtrack developer splashes or bleeds into the picture area, it converts silver halide back to silver within the image which won't be cleaned out by the 2nd fixer. The silver appears as gray or black over the image. No "purple tinge":

Here are the Kodak ECP-2D process specifications:

http://www.kodak.com/US/plugins/acrobat/en/motion/support/processing/h249/h2409.pdf

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Jentsch
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1061
From: New Berlin, WI, USA
Registered: Apr 2003


 - posted 12-10-2003 04:29 PM      Profile for Scott Jentsch   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Jentsch   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Attended FOTR-SE last night at Marcus Ridge Cinema in New Berlin, WI, and the Crap Code was all over the reel where they are in Lorien.

Every time Galadriel appeared on screen, she would have Chicken Pox.

Fortunately, I didn't see it anywhere else during the film.

 |  IP: Logged

Charles Everett
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1470
From: New Jersey
Registered: May 2001


 - posted 12-11-2003 05:00 PM      Profile for Charles Everett   Email Charles Everett   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CRAP Code on mainstream movies, CRAP Code on arthouse product, now CRAP Code on re-releases. The Triple Crown!

 |  IP: Logged

Liam Utley
Film Handler

Posts: 42
From: Australia
Registered: Oct 2003


 - posted 12-11-2003 09:15 PM      Profile for Liam Utley     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The cinema i work at received an email stating that ROTK will have anti-piracy coding... please, for the sake of all that is good (and my sanity), please dont let it be LOTR: ROTCAP!!! I felt that CAP code really took my focus off the movie during Kill Bill during the B&W scenes. I'll wait for the dvd so that i can enjoy it properly.

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-11-2003 10:05 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I didn't notice any crap code on "Last Samauri"... Anyone else notice it?
Mark

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.