Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Turrets and lenses

   
Author Topic: Turrets and lenses
Alan Gilbertson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 148
From: Carpentersville Il 60110
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-04-2003 12:18 PM      Profile for Alan Gilbertson   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gilbertson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
At one of our location we are going to play some old classic's. So we are taking out the flat lens and changing it to run 1:33. Can someone tell me why the center is moving, when using RP-40 the center line is the same wether you are using 1:85 or 1:33. Can someone please help.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-04-2003 12:20 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Are these full-frame silent aperture prints, where the picture fills the full width of the film between the sprocket holes (no soundtrack area)?

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 12-04-2003 12:23 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Assume you mean you are running the "classics" with the Academy 1.37:1 aspect ratio. SMPTE 195 specifies a projectable image area of 0.825 x 0.602 inches with the same centerlines as the 1.85:1 aspect ratio. If the vertical centerline is shifting, it may be due to the lens mount.

Or are you running silent films that have NO soundtrack area, and have the centerline down the center of the film?

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gilbertson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 148
From: Carpentersville Il 60110
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-04-2003 12:36 PM      Profile for Alan Gilbertson   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gilbertson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
We are playing CASABLANCA, SHANE, SOME LIKE IT HOT, ITS A WONDERFUL LIFE and GONE WITH THE WIND (2:35) none of the prints are silent. And the aspect ratio is 1:37 except for one of them that is 1:66. Our current flat lens (1:85) is 70mm and the 1:37 calculates to a 95mm. As for the lens mount we changed nothing. When you put the flat lens back in everything fall back on center.

 |  IP: Logged

Kris Brunton
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 108
From: Napanee, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 12-04-2003 12:51 PM      Profile for Kris Brunton   Email Kris Brunton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What happens when you rotate the 95mm lens in the barrel? What type of turret are you using?

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gilbertson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 148
From: Carpentersville Il 60110
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-04-2003 01:08 PM      Profile for Alan Gilbertson   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gilbertson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The center line stays left of center. We are using a Strong TU-2000 turret.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 12-04-2003 01:15 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
We are playing CASABLANCA, SHANE, SOME LIKE IT HOT, ITS A WONDERFUL LIFE and GONE WITH THE WIND (2:35) none of the prints are silent.
"Gone With the Wind", "Casablanca", "It's a Wonderful Life", and "Shane" were all composed for Academy (1.375:1) ratio. But "Shane" was shown 1.66:1 since it was released at the beginning of the widescreen era. "Some Like It Hot" was 1.85:1.

http://www.widescreenmuseum.com/widescreen/evolution.htm

quote:
1.66:1
Paramount was the first to break with the traditional 1.37:1 aspect ratio with the release of Shane in 1953. The film, which was photographed conventionally, was projected with the top and bottom cropped to achieve a 1.66:1 aspect ratio and theatres used new larger screens to sell the "new" wide screen concept to the public. Paramount established 1.66:1 for their conventional cropped widescreen presentations.

Do you have the pillar-boxed "scope" version of GWTW, or is it one of the full image 1.37:1 dye transfer prints?

All of these would be shown with a vertical centerline that agrees with the SMPTE 35-PA (RP40) test film, which is 0.738 inches from the reference edge (soundtrack side) of the print.

 |  IP: Logged

Alan Gilbertson
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 148
From: Carpentersville Il 60110
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 12-04-2003 02:36 PM      Profile for Alan Gilbertson   Author's Homepage   Email Alan Gilbertson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hi John, we have been told that GONE WITH THE WIND is 2:35 and SHANE is1:66 and the rest of the prints are 1:37

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 12-04-2003 04:00 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Some Like It Hot" is 1.85:1, not 1.37:1.

All have the same vertical center line.

Today, the "scope" area defined by SMPTE 195 is 0.825 x 0.690 inches, which works out to 2.39:1. Of course, your anamorphic print of GWTW is "pillarboxed" 1.37:1 inside this area.

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 12-04-2003 05:19 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is the make of the lens you are using for 1:33? Also, how far off it it?

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 12-04-2003 07:35 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gone with the wind is definately 1.37. The mid 50's print I owned had its own special aspect ratio as the frames were sometimes a bit shorter than normal, and the I.B. print of Shane I once had ran at 1.37 just fine. Not sure exactly where it should be projected but 1.37 looked correct to me. The DVD of course is there and looks good. Since Shane was filmed in 1953 before the advent of any 35mm Wide Screen process, and Cinerama was just appearing, 1.37 has to be correct. I really don't think 1.66 would look correct for Shane.

Mwahaaaaaaaahaaaaaaaahaaaaaaz TU-2000 [thumbsdown] Just set up each film with that 95mm lens in the turrett individually using the height stopper and centering adjustments. Takes less than a minuite with RP-40! That turrett's a piece of junk!
Mark @ CLACO

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 12-04-2003 10:27 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Obviously the turret is not parking the lens so the optical centerline is aligned with the center of the film frame which is throwing the image slightly off but the aim of the projector is compensating. The amount of shift on the screen is going to vary with the focal length of the lens with a greater on-screen shift with a shorter lens. For example a 1mm error might move the picture over by 2 ft with the lens you use for 1.85 but only 18" with the lens you use for 1.37. Thus, when you pop out one lens and put in the other the picture will seem to move by 6" because it's not being shifted in this way as much as with the shorter lens.

You don't notice this normally because the offset is countered by the projector aim and the Scope mount has its own adjustments so that it all works out. As this is a limited event it should not be hard to make whatever adjustments are needed before each film.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 12-05-2003 02:05 AM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve has definitely pegged it. See if you can get yourself an Align-O-Tron and line up the turret stop with the center line of PA35 test film. This is becoming part of my standard routine now and the increase in sharpness is astounding! It will also fix your problem.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.