Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » ill-centered hard mattes on old film?

   
Author Topic: ill-centered hard mattes on old film?
Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 11-18-2003 06:08 AM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
we're showing a film 1.66 on one screen, with the framing set perfectly. the trailers before the film are hard-matted somewhere between 1.66 and 1.85, and the image between the mattes is centered vertically on the screen. so far so good. but the other day we ran a feature-length show of mostly 80's trailers and damned if they weren't all high on the screen. those with hard mattes would show a black bar at the bottom and the image would reach the top of the screen and probably beyond. no, it wasn't a mis-thread. i don't do that, and it wasn't off by as much as 1/4 frame. i wouldn't have thought that framing specs were different 20 years ago. the most plausible thing i can think of is film shrinkage lowering the image in the gate and raising it on screen. but i'm still surprised at the consistency from trailer to trailer. on the other hand, they have all been stored on the same 6k's for most of their lives.

carl

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-18-2003 06:36 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Carl,

You have two potential issues...they were printed wrong (I've shown many a mis-racked film)...the second involves bi-directional printing...if your trailers were on the reverse print direction then you will be off by difference between the sprocket tooth and the perforation height on the printer.

Nothing beats when they make a two-strip 3D film with bi-directional printing...yep seen that happen too...every reel seems mis registered (left to right eye).

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 11-18-2003 08:48 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
the second involves bi-directional printing...if your trailers were on the reverse print direction then you will be off by difference between the sprocket tooth and the perforation height on the printer.

That dog won't hunt. The shift you would get by reversing continuous contact printing will only be the difference in sprocket hole height caused by BH vs. KS, short pitch vs. long pitch etc. which is a much smaller shift than that described. If you have a sprocket handy you can try it with a couple of layers of film bi-packed. Or you can simulate with a couple layers of film and some sort of pin pushing one way or the other. With two layers of the same type of film the alignment remains the same!

Ditto step contact printing. Maybe with an optical printer if no other adjustments are made but that's unlikely the cause.

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Case
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 131
From: Sydney NSW Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 11-19-2003 12:18 AM      Profile for Dominic Case   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
the second involves bi-directional printing...if your trailers were on the reverse print direction
A mis-adjusted printer can conceivably cause this: much less than 1/4 frame, possibly up to half a perf-height - but if you have a collection of trailers joined together then it seems very very unlikely that they would all have been printed the same.

You would need to examine the print itself to determine if the framing is off-centre relative to the perfs, or if for some reason the other material that you have aligned to is wrong.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 11-19-2003 01:11 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree with Dominic that bi-directional printing would not explain a difference that big. Likewise, shrinkage would not explain it, as enough shrinkage to notice would make the film suffer sprocket damage. As he suggests, examine the print itself, and try to accurately measure the actual shift in the center of the frameline from the nominal of exactly between two perfs.

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 11-19-2003 07:33 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Are you saying that ALL the trailers of a particular age are misaligned and by the same amount? Or does each one have an offset error different relative to each other? If you mix and splice a few trailers together, does the matte jump to different positions for each one? If that is the scenario, then yes, you may have a few trailers that are just badly printed.

I can understand one or two having a off-center matte -- I've seen that, but really only on very rare occasions (and it had nothing to do with the age of the trailer -- it can happen to new as well as old) but the likelyhood that you could find 2 or 3 trailers where they ALL are printed incorrectly to same error amount, i.e., the matte is shifted up or down to exactly the same position in each trailer is so unlikely that it points to some other factor rather than printer error.

If you told me you had a reel where trailers 1 and 2 are in perfect frame and then 3 , 4 and 5 are all out by the same amount, but not enough for it to be a misframe, I would say look to the framing assembly -- perhaps something has caused it to slip slightly, say a really bad splice -- that would cause everything after that splice to slightly out.

I had gears strip once while the film was running and what happened on the screen was at first the frame moved up slightly is small incriments. Of course that was a catastrophic failure, but maybe there is something less severe causing the frame assembly to slip by a small amount.

That;s only a guess....the guys with more mechanical saavy can tell you if that is a possibility.

Frank

 |  IP: Logged

Carl Martin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1424
From: Oakland, CA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 11-20-2003 05:08 AM      Profile for Carl Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Carl Martin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
the regularly scheduled program run before and after the trailer show was framed perfectly, so there was no framing drift. the offset on the trailers seemed quite consistent, but it's hard to judge given that the mattes vary in size and not all the trailers have them.

in any case, i had to un-platter the trailers to make room for another film, so i'll have to put the issue to rest for the time being.

carl

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.