Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » 16mm Victor Animatophone Model 60 Projector (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: 16mm Victor Animatophone Model 60 Projector
Richard Thomas
Film Handler

Posts: 11
From: Trinidad, CO
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 11-12-2003 04:32 PM      Profile for Richard Thomas   Email Richard Thomas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Can anyone who knows old Victors tell me if this Model 60 has a tube or solid state audio system? Any other info on this old guy will help: anyone know how well it handles film, especially shrinkage?

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 11-12-2003 05:34 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tube. The pull-down shuttle is two pin so missing perforations may jump....no worse than a Kodak Pagent. film trip levers maybe too sensitive for some people. The sound scanner area is a curved gate which the film glides across prior to the sound damping flywheel; this should be kept clean.

 |  IP: Logged

John Anastasio
Master Film Handler

Posts: 325
From: Trenton, NJ, USA
Registered: Sep 2000


 - posted 11-12-2003 05:34 PM      Profile for John Anastasio   Author's Homepage   Email John Anastasio   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Despite their strange looking film path, the animatophones were excellent film handlers. One of the things I liked about them was the automatic cutout, which shut the transport mechanism totally down if a loop was lost. You had to really work at damaging a film with one of them. I could be wrong, but I think that all of them had tube amps.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 11-12-2003 06:12 PM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Jump on over to www.film-center.com and buy the "Equipment Manuals" cd rom. All Victors and Kalart-Victors thread the same and there is the threading diagrams on the cd rom. If you need the service manual, I have an excellent original one covering the models 40 thru 60. It's very detailed and has schematics for the amplifiers (they are all tubes). The service manual runs around 140 pages!

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce McGee
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1776
From: Asheville, NC USA... Nowhere in Particular.
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 11-12-2003 06:50 PM      Profile for Bruce McGee   Email Bruce McGee   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've got 6 Victors. 40's thru 70-25. All are good film handlers, and YES, you gotta keep the sound optics spotless.

Fine machines!

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Thomas
Film Handler

Posts: 11
From: Trinidad, CO
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 11-12-2003 08:07 PM      Profile for Richard Thomas   Email Richard Thomas   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you very much for the replies. I really appreciate the information. I have a great film collection under restoration and the usual Eiki's but no Victor. So now I have been offered one finally 50 years later and now thanks to you understand it is a great machine. Perfect! Ken, I would love to buy your service manual as the machine may need re-capping, and loving care. And Bruce I know you are a collector like I am and when you say you like them I do understand what that means.

Thanks all!

RL

[ 11-12-2003, 09:32 PM: Message edited by: Richard Thomas ]

 |  IP: Logged

Webster Colcord
Film Handler

Posts: 23
From: Alameda, California
Registered: Oct 2003


 - posted 11-13-2003 03:45 PM      Profile for Webster Colcord   Author's Homepage   Email Webster Colcord   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While you're on the subject of 16mm projectors, I have always been a fan of the Kodak Pageant and I just recently purchased one with a Gemini Arc lamp. The lamps are still being made, so I thought it might be better to purchase this one than a projector that uses the Marc 300. Has anyone had any negative/ positive experience with this projector/ lamp combination?

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Carter
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 162
From: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 11-13-2003 07:27 PM      Profile for Bill Carter   Email Bill Carter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The Pageants are nice machines. I am also a big fan of the Victor. The loop failsafes are a great thing, especially when running an older, rougher print.

My favorite 16mm machine in my own collection is a Victor with a cute little carbon arc lamphouse. I'll try to get around to taking some pics to post.

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Taylor
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 601
From: Chatham, NJ/East Hampton, NY
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 11-17-2003 08:36 AM      Profile for Jeff Taylor   Email Jeff Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Having had any number of "vintage" 16mm projectors through the years I can happily trade nostalgia for a xenon Eiki, but I have to say that compared to the Pageants, Victors, B&H's, and DeVry's, I have always felt that the standout older machine was the RCA 400. In terms of gentleness, easy threading, wide open construction, and great sound they were tops. Anyone who's tried to work on a Pageant would shoot themselves if they saw how easily the RCA's come apart for service.

 |  IP: Logged

Bruce McGee
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1776
From: Asheville, NC USA... Nowhere in Particular.
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 11-17-2003 08:32 PM      Profile for Bruce McGee   Email Bruce McGee   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The RCA 400's ROCK! I've got 3 of them. The oldest one was built in 1946, and was bought for $25 about 15 years ago. A single capacitor was replaced in the amp. It's been running film for me ever since.

I got my first Victor 40 as a gift in 1999. I grew up seeing ads for them in the National Geographic Magazines that my grandparents had. After a few hours of maintenance, the 40 was running film.

I guess I was hooked after that.

My Favorite Victor is my 70-15 from 1961-62. It was gotten on eBay to be a parts machine. The seller said that it didn't run other than the motor spinning. No problem. In shipping, it got dropped and the reel arms were destroyed along with all of the tubes. I sat it on the shelf for parts.

Then: I got some reel arms.

All of the tubes were in my junk boxes.

As it sits, it is the most quiet running of all of my 16mm machines. Now, my other 70 could be parts... [Big Grin]

I just KNEW the Animatophone had to be a fine machine. I noticed them in the 'Geographic,' and figured that anything with a threading path that threads sound first can't be all bad!

I use this machine as part of a pair of 70's that I rent out now and then. The other 70 has a brush-type motor and runs with more noise.

Also have a pair of 40's, and a pair of 65-10's from 1956.

OMG: I have 7 machines! I forgot the model 55 that shocked the P**S out of me when I initially plugged it in! It looks almost brand new. Need to rebuild its amp, though. (Damned capacitors!)

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 11-17-2003 10:06 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The RCA-400 in my opinion was one of the best! [Smile]

 |  IP: Logged

Jon Miller
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 973
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 11-17-2003 11:45 PM      Profile for Jon Miller   Email Jon Miller   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Of the Kalart-Victor 70-series models produced from the late 1950s (?) to the early 1980s (!), my favorite has to be the late-model units with the induction motor. I have a few in my collection that have to be the quietest-running projectors ever designed, even quieter than the RCA 400 (and I have a 416R to compare the Victors against...the 416R is by far the least noisy of any projector of its vintage).

I've always felt the threading pattern of the Victor was a good test of your A-V acumen...if you could thread a Victor properly, you could thread anything. [Smile] (...well, any 16mm projector, that is.) I've seen more than my share of people get stumped trying to thread a Victor without any formal instruction, and I've bailed out a few teachers in my high-school days.

Bill C., is the carbon-arc Victor you mentioned one of these?:

 -

[Edit...Woo-hoo! 250th post! I've reached the "Master Film Handler" level now! [Big Grin] ]

 |  IP: Logged

Jeff Taylor
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 601
From: Chatham, NJ/East Hampton, NY
Registered: Apr 2000


 - posted 11-18-2003 08:08 AM      Profile for Jeff Taylor   Email Jeff Taylor   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
au contraire, the 416R (which was a rare bird with the reversing capability) was generally noisier than the earlier 400's as it had the oil soaked metal drive gears vs. the early 400's with the fibre ones(which I have found to be virtually indestructable). The 416 also has what I think is an inferior amp with the 6973 ouptputs and the voltage doubler power supply vs. the 400's with 6V6 outputs and a massivbe piece of iron in the power supply. BTW: Those early 400 amps make dandy guitar amps with some tweaking!

 |  IP: Logged

Sam Hunter
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 779
From: West Monroe, LA, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 11-18-2003 09:24 AM      Profile for Sam Hunter   Email Sam Hunter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thats a neat projector there Jon [thumbsup]
One day I hope to find a RCA Porta Arc.

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Layton
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1452
From: Olympia, Wash. USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 11-18-2003 10:06 AM      Profile for Ken Layton   Email Ken Layton   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sam:

That should be "Porto Arc". [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.