my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Dolby optical pre-amp cards

Author Topic: Dolby optical pre-amp cards Stephen Furley Film God Posts: 3059 From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England Registered: May 2002 posted 11-07-2003 04:48 AM                     What is the difference between the Cat. 108 card used in the CP-50, and the Cat. 240 used in the CP-55 and 65? Is it possible to use a Cat. 240 in a CP-50?  |  IP: Logged Mark Gulbrandsen Resident Trollmaster Posts: 16657 From: Music City Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-07-2003 08:33 AM                     Stephen, Which CAT 240 do you have? There is one that is transfomrer coupled(has a square input transformer eight on the PCB CAT 240) and a later one that I believe is direct coupled with no transformer CAT 240A. There is a HUGE difference between them, and in the slit loss frequency action between the two. Similar differences will be found on the CAT 108 vs. the CAT 108C for the CP50/200 At any rate Panastereo is making the best optical preamp(processor for that matter) on the market no holds barred! So if you're thinking about adapting some other board consider theirs first but be sure you can attain the required needed levels to drive the CP without alot of. Having worked with all of the major processors in the last couple of months I can definately attest to that. Mark @ CLACO  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 11-07-2003 08:41 AM                     Thre is very little in common between the Cat. 240 and the Cat. 108. The Cat. 108 used external transformers, the the Cat. 240 has them onboad (and the Cat. 240A, as Mark stated is direct coupled to transistor inputs). The Cat. 108 used discrete componetry, the Cat. 240 uses ICs mostly. The pinouts are not the same so you can't plug one in the place of the other either. Steve  |  IP: Logged Stephen Furley Film God Posts: 3059 From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England Registered: May 2002 posted 11-07-2003 09:15 AM                     quote: you can't plug one in the place of the other I thought that would be the case, but it couldn't do any harm to ask. There is an old CP-50 which I could borrow from somewhere, but it is missing the 108, (and a few other bits) I wanted to use it at home for a few days, connected to an old soundhead to listen to some old mono tracks, probably only on headphones. In my case of tools and spares which I carry around when I'm doing any projection work I have a spare 240, and I hoped I might be able to use that. Forget about the CP-50 then; maybe I can wire the cell into the amp in an old Bell and Howell 16mm machine, I'm not worried about sound quality, as long as I can make out the commentary it'll be good enough.  |  IP: Logged Peter Hall Master Film Handler Posts: 314 From: London, UK Registered: Dec 2000 posted 11-07-2003 11:35 AM                        HI Steven - If you have a 240 then you should be able to hook it up to a PSU - sometimes the LtRt outputs will drive a set of headphones.. Otherwise feed the outs (ideally via tx) to a line amp Or buy one of my CP50s !!  |  IP: Logged Bruce Hansen Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 847 From: Stone Mountain, GA, USA Registered: Dec 1999 posted 11-07-2003 12:02 PM                     If you just want to listen to old mono tracks, then you do not need any noise reduction (A or SR). Just connect the cell output to the mike in on a mixer (do not use mag phono inputs, the EQ is all wrong).  |  IP: Logged Chris Trainor Expert Film Handler Posts: 161 From: Greenville, RI, USA Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-09-2003 04:08 PM                        Even if you want to listen to stereo prints doing that isn't a bad idea. I used a DJ mixer for a while before I got a cinema processor on my home system. Took the left-right outputs from the cell and ran them into the 2 microphone inputs on my RatShack DJ mixer then sent the outputs from the mixer into a 1octave EQ then onto a 200watt DJ amplifier. Worked. Sounded decent as long as the print was clean. Only really tried it with A type prints tho, not quite sure how SR would sound. --Chris  |  IP: Logged William Hooper Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1879 From: Mobile, AL USA Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-01-2004 06:15 AM                        How many Cat. 240 cards have failed on you? What's the usual failure mode of the Cat. 240? After finally no longer being intimidated by the slot for the "Spare Cat. 240", one finally went out on me. It's failure mode was inability to switch to projector 2 on changeover (when the Cat. 240 c/o circuit was closed).  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.