Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Color Test frames

   
Author Topic: Color Test frames
Jonathan Ralston
Film Handler

Posts: 13
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 10-13-2003 10:11 PM      Profile for Jonathan Ralston   Email Jonathan Ralston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Everyone's seen the pictures of one of two or three women at the end of trailers and sometimes the tails of prints. Any clue who that person is. Does anybody else wonder about that?

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 10-13-2003 10:39 PM      Profile for Aaron Sisemore   Email Aaron Sisemore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
She is called the LAD (Laboratory Aim Density) Girl .

Do a search for 'LAD Girl' here on Film-Tech and several threads about the subject come up.

John Pytlak also knows quite a bit about her, I believe he was instrumental in her 'creation' ... [Smile]

 -

-Aaron

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 10-13-2003 10:50 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Developing the Laboratory Aim Density (LAD) control method was one of my first projects at Kodak. It simplifies the control of color and density during film duplication by laboratories, allowing more consistent prints. Working with my long-time technician Al Fleischer, I presented the first technical paper at the SMPTE Conference in Toronto in November 1974. The first paper was published in the October 1976 SMPTE Journal. In 1982, LAD Girl added additional gray and color patches, as well as a photo of a pretty Kodak model to aid labs in setup of the color analyzer.

I recently was honored to receive an Academy Scientific and Technical Award for the development of LAD:

http://www.film-tech.com/trailers/filmtechpytlak.html

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Case
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 131
From: Sydney NSW Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 10-13-2003 11:08 PM      Profile for Dominic Case   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John's correct in claiming the LAD system as his: but the girl has been around longer than the LAD. She is traditionally called the "Chinagirl", and has always used a grey patch (which the LAD system standardised) and a model. Originally I believe Kodak supplied this, but they used a mannequin instead of a real person - a "china doll". I think it started in black and white days, maybe they could get away with the lack of real skin-tone. We used to joke to the model for the Australian version a few years ago that she had been on more films than any Hollywood star.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 10-14-2003 05:51 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Yes, Kodak supplied a "China Girl" for many years. Originally a china mannequin, later a real girl. The original LAD was based only on a gray patch, but many still wanted a "real" scene to aid in setup and control, so the two ideas were combined.

Only 800 feet of negative was shot for the original LAD Girl in 1982. Labs are supplied duplicate negatives made from this 20+ year old original negative. The duplicate negatives are now made from a digital master of the original negative. "LAD Girl" is likely now a grandmother. [Cool]

 |  IP: Logged

Matthew Peters
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 179
From: Glen Waverley, Melbourne, Australia
Registered: Nov 2002


 - posted 10-14-2003 06:56 AM      Profile for Matthew Peters   Email Matthew Peters   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
An Australian Version

 -

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 10-14-2003 03:34 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Matthew Peters provided:

quote:
An Australian Version
I notice that the fairly washed out image you provided was of a print that was not made on Kodak print film. [thumbsdown] [Wink]

And from Mr. Case's lab, no less. [Wink] (No hard feelings.)

 |  IP: Logged

Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 10-14-2003 04:28 PM      Profile for Aaron Sisemore   Email Aaron Sisemore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
I notice that the fairly washed out image you provided was of a print that was not made on Kodak print film.
Either the print or neg was Agfa, from the 'A G' (Agfa-Gevaert) I see on the top left of the strip.

-Aaron

 |  IP: Logged

Dominic Case
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 131
From: Sydney NSW Australia
Registered: Aug 2003


 - posted 10-15-2003 03:04 AM      Profile for Dominic Case   Author's Homepage     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
YEs it's true! The edge markings are on the print (they would be white if from the neg). So this print was indeed on Agfa stock. Sorry John. [Wink]

I updated that particular chinagirl some years ago, but I can't identify the girl. For a previous chinagirl we shot a still and copied it on an animation stand (now it's done digitally): that way the flesh tones remain perfectly constant. The trouble with live shooting even the 800 feet John mentioned - about 9 minutes of running time - is that there is plenty of time for the model to blush or go pale, making colour matching a little harder.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.