my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Cinemeccanica Sound Head Advice

Author Topic: Cinemeccanica Sound Head Advice Mike Pennell Expert Film Handler Posts: 150 From: Tucson, AZ, USA Registered: Apr 2003 posted 10-02-2003 03:30 AM                     I have vic 4's at one location and vic 5's at another. I love the projectors, but hate the soundhead design. They are constantly being knocked out of alignment and damaged by brain wraps. The timing of the platters are not an issue as they run fine when i am present at the locations, most of the time the wraps occur when idiot operators leave the tails taped after they move the prints. We are soon to be updating to the reverse scan. Is there options for different soundheads for these projectors or some type of upgrade available from Cinemeccanica? Thanks Mike  |  IP: Logged Pete Naples Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1565 From: Dunfermline, Scotland Registered: Feb 2001 posted 10-02-2003 03:41 AM                     Reverse scan on cinemecannica is more robust than forward scan, as you get rid of the fragile SVA cell and replace it with the LED. Have you considered fitting tension sensing failsafe devices to the platters?  |  IP: Logged Mike Pennell Expert Film Handler Posts: 150 From: Tucson, AZ, USA Registered: Apr 2003 posted 10-02-2003 04:00 AM                     Thanks for the encouraging news on the reverse scan robustness. I would love any information on tension fail safes. mike  |  IP: Logged Pete Naples Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1565 From: Dunfermline, Scotland Registered: Feb 2001 posted 10-02-2003 04:42 AM                     Typically you can get them from your platter manufacturer, if not I think there are some universal devices available too. usually it consists of three rollers, one of which is mounted on a short pivoting arm. Excessive film tension moves the arm, which pushes a switch, which stops the machine...  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 10-02-2003 09:35 AM                     THe BCAP and the Kelmar have a large flywheel that mounts in the centre of the scanner to prevent film dropping in to the centre section  |  IP: Logged Thomas Procyk Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1842 From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 10-02-2003 12:04 PM                     We run Victoria 5's and I've noticed some of our machines have a very fragile cell inside the soundrum part. (looks like it's just on a piece of plastic, leaving most of the inside of the sound drum hollow for the film to pull into and snap it off) and some of ours are fitted with a different cell, actually part of a thick piece of metal that's inside the sound drum and fits completely into the hollow center, leaving no room for film to get yanked in there and snap off the cell. I think if I took pictures, it would be easier to see. =TMP=  |  IP: Logged Pete Naples Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1565 From: Dunfermline, Scotland Registered: Feb 2001 posted 10-02-2003 01:45 PM                     If they are od dolby manufacture then the thin flimsy thing is an earlier design of cell and arm, the sturdier type is later. They are interchangeable.  |  IP: Logged Ken McFall Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 615 From: Haringey, London. Registered: Apr 2001 posted 10-02-2003 02:18 PM                     As Pete say's the reverse scan upgrade is well worth doing. It gives you extra protection against damage if you have a film wrap as the red led mounts are much sturdier than the Dolby cell on its flimsy bracket. Also you are ready for Digital when you can afford to go there It's worth remembering that the bearings for the sound drum are possibly quite old now and would be replaced at the same time as the drum as a matter of routine giving improved performance from the sound head overall. It is well worth fitting some sort of wrap sensor as this will give protection to the projector, sound head and any wall mounted rollers..... Depending on the type of system you consider there would be no damage to the print at all. Sensors with a sliding roller assembly are the best as they allow time for the projector to stop! No tension between the platter and the projector... just clear the wrap, find the cause and you're back on screen. A wrap can easily pull rollers out of the wall and cause all sorts of damage, with the real possibility of losing the rest of the show. One wrap with no damage caused would pay for a sensor system in one go! [ 10-02-2003, 03:23 PM: Message edited by: Ken McFall ]  |  IP: Logged Jean-Michel Grin Expert Film Handler Posts: 222 From: Geneva & Lausanne, Switzerland Registered: Jul 2002 posted 10-02-2003 02:48 PM                        Here is two pics of a V8 and a V5 soundhead: They look closely same. I experienced some brainwarp, with a polyester is a nightmare, even the projector mechanism could be damaged. For this reason we adapted a Strong failsafe switch on ours Cinemeccanica platters this solved the problem. And we added a delayed relay to stop the projector: the failsafe switch was soo sensible, it will shutdown the projector at every splices ! Good luck !  |  IP: Logged Kris Brunton Expert Film Handler Posts: 108 From: Napanee, Ontario, Canada Registered: Apr 2000 posted 10-02-2003 06:12 PM                     I like to add the larger drum when upgrading with a cinemecanica reverse scan reader. When not using the cinemeccanica reverse scan I like the BACP readers. With these readers the amount of service calls for bent cells, bent led brackets are reduced to virtually nil.  |  IP: Logged Rick Long Jedi Master Film Handler Posts: 759 From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada Registered: Nov 1999 posted 10-02-2003 10:56 PM                     What Ken McFall said about changing the sound-head bearings is a wise comment. After all, you've got the thing apart anyways, why not take the opportunity to do it? Also this is an excellent opportunity to clean and lubricate the lay-on rollers.  |  IP: Logged Richard Fowler Film God Posts: 2392 From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA Registered: Jun 2001 posted 10-03-2003 10:38 AM                     The complete reverse scan kit from Cinemeccanica includes a new sound drum with the center area filled in save for a slot for the LED bracket. The outside edge which the film travels is also thinner to allow for the optional digital reader to see the Dolby Digital track. If you are not planning for future digital, the BACP utilizes the existing drum, with the thicker film support edges; a spacer ring with set screw is mounted in the middle of the drum to prevent film wraps. Bearings and possibly the top film pressure roller should be replaced if you considering the upgrade.  |  IP: Logged Jean-Michel Grin Expert Film Handler Posts: 222 From: Geneva & Lausanne, Switzerland Registered: Jul 2002 posted 10-03-2003 12:00 PM                        That's right: Is realy indicated to change bearings when ugrading a reader, but You will need the original Cinemeccanica tool to remove some parts. And believe me, it's realy a pain off ass to do the job !  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.