Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Need help with questions about the silent movie era (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
Author Topic: Need help with questions about the silent movie era
Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-19-2003 06:48 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A visitor to our theatre website sent me these questions about the silent movie era. I have a couple of "guesses" on some of them, but mostly I'm clueless about that time. Any help would be appreciated. Here are the questions.

1. When did nitrate prints stop being used? How long after did they circulate? Any still around?

2. Can an old projector (with soundhead) play a silent print? Where they standard 35mm? Are new prints being made today of old silent films?

3. Do you know what the reel sizes/lengths were for silent films? The same as sound films?

4. Were there any trailers made of silent features?

5. Do you know, perchance, who distributes silent films today?

[ 08-20-2003, 12:26 PM: Message edited by: Mike Blakesley ]

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Allen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 688
From: Evansville, IN, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-19-2003 06:53 PM      Profile for Brad Allen   Email Brad Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike, don't know the answers. But a quick search on google finds this and many more.

Silent movie info

 |  IP: Logged

Robert E. Allen
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1078
From: Checotah, Oklahoma
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 08-19-2003 07:13 PM      Profile for Robert E. Allen   Email Robert E. Allen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The one question I can answer is that silent films were photographed at 16 FPS (frames per second) rather than the 24 used for sound today. So while they can be run on today's projectors (Aspect ratio 1.33) unless they are re-processed with some frames duplicated the action is speeded up considerably.

If our Kodak rep John is looking on he can answer the nitrate thing for you.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul Mayer
Oh get out of it Melvin, before it pulls you under!

Posts: 3836
From: Albuquerque, NM
Registered: Feb 2000


 - posted 08-19-2003 07:27 PM      Profile for Paul Mayer   Author's Homepage   Email Paul Mayer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
As to your Q#2, I got to see a brand new print of the Lon Chaney Phantom of the Opera in 2001 at the Orpheum Theater in Los Angeles. It was made up on a platter and played on the existing booth equipment (at that time the Orpheum was running as a Spanish-language grind house). I assume some of the changes they had to make would be things like crank speed, screen masking, aperture plate, lens, plus a possible reduction in lamp current due to B&W print heat related issues.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon Bachlund
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 696
From: Monrovia, CA, USA
Registered: Aug 1999


 - posted 08-19-2003 07:40 PM      Profile for Gordon Bachlund   Author's Homepage   Email Gordon Bachlund   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Answers to some of your questions may be found at www.film-center.com. On home page click on "Historical Perspective" under COLLECTING BASICS.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-19-2003 07:47 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry Bob...I've got to jump on you for that one...where did you get your "information" that silent films ran at 16fps?

The truth is that silent film speeds were all over the place...the SLOWEST I've personally seen was 16fps the fastest was 22 fps. Some have cue sheets when to over-crank and when to under-crank. Believe it or not sometimes the speed of the camera/projector were used to add effect.

Silent films seem to be on the climb in terms of places to show them. There number of rooms we are setting up to be silent capable is much higher than ever.

Silent films are on standard 35mm stock with 4-perfs per frame. The frame sizes vary though...I believe 1916 was the cut-off point where the frame tended to be standard (for projection that is)...around 1916 the projection frame standardized at about .680" x .910" give or take a couple thousandths. I've measured several period projectors to verify this (across a few brands... like Powers and Simplex...etc)...note, there were not aperture plates, just apertures!

The most popular way I set up rooms for silent film capability is with Kinoton's "E" projectors (FP-30/38ES). They give a digital readout and continiously variable speed control from 12fps to 30fps.

However, I have also done Simplex and Century. Using a 3-phase motor and a frequency converter (there are several good companies like TB Woods, Lenze, Reliance...etc) where you can program in various speeds and variable speed so you can have your standard 24 fps for most shows but can go to whatever you want for silent. Note, this technology would also allow a completely automated switch between faster and slower frame rates. The cost is on the order of a red-reader conversion. [Wink]

Many will claim that if you do slower speeds with conventional projectors like Simplex and Century you should invest in a 3-wing shutter so the projector doesn't flicker so badly...others find the increased flicker "charming" and adds to the moode of the olde time "flicks." The above mentioned Kinoton "E" projectors don't increase the flicker when they slow down the film...the shutter is maintained at the faster speed however they program it to simulate a 3-wing shutter below 20fps.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 08-19-2003 07:58 PM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mike,

please e-mail me at Wkutler1506@yahoo. I have some extensive info for you.

There is also a lot of info under Simplex in the manuals section of FT.

Before electric motors were introduced, both the camera and projector were hand cranked, and speed could be varied to compensate for action. Furthermore, the projectionist and musical conductor would have to work as a coordinated team.

With the advent of Sound on Disc (WE) and Sound On Film, and the addition of electric motors, machines such as the WE U-Base had a variable speed clutch for both sound and silent.

Yes, 35mm silent film can be used on modern machines. In fact the Simplex Front Shutter Standards and Regulars were first hand cranked, then motors were introduced, then these projectors were converted to rear shutter. Then they were replaced by Supers.

 |  IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 08-19-2003 10:01 PM      Profile for Martin Brooks   Author's Homepage   Email Martin Brooks   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
There were a number of apertures used during the silent era, but it's unlikely that you'd be using any prints from that era. When most were reprinted, they used relatively modern standards.

From 1917 to 1927, many silent films used an aperture of .906 x .675 (1.342:1).
Edison used a format of .906 x .6795 = 1.33.
As indicated in another posting, .910 x .680 (1.33) was also used.
And sometimes a full negative image of .980 x .735 (1.33) was used.

FYI, the original sound 1927 aperture was .825 x .680 with the centerline shifted to the right. I've also seen documentation claiming .800 x .6795 (1.78:1) and .8 x .607 (1.318:1), but 1932 saw the adoption of the "Academy" aperture of .825 x .600 (1.37:1).

It is illegal to show nitrate prints in most places without having special facilities that are approved by the fire marshalls. I think UCLA has such a facility and perhaps the Museum of Modern Art at the main NYC location (which is temporarily closed for construction).

 |  IP: Logged

William Hooper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1879
From: Mobile, AL USA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-20-2003 01:51 AM      Profile for William Hooper   Author's Homepage   Email William Hooper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
2. Can an old projector (with soundhead) play a silent print? Where they standard 35mm?
Yes. But a big problem if the print is one that was actually made during the silent era will be of course shrinkage of the base.

quote:
Are new prints being made today of old silent films?
Yes. Kino films has a theatrical division which has 35mm prints of silent titles, also archives do restorations & strike new prints. Many famous, late 20s silents are still under copyright to the studios which made them. Metropolis is such an example, which coincidentally is distributed in the US by Kino
http://www.kino.com/theatrical/index.html
Turner used to have some of the silent DeMille's, like the silent Ten Commandments.

quote:
3. Do you know what the reel sizes/lengths were for silent films? The same as sound films?
Originally, the standard reel size was 1,000 feet. That's why there's that splice in the middle of your 2,000 foot reels! Of course, if you get a new print of a silent, it will come on 2,000 foot reels.

quote:
4. Were there any trailers made of silent features?
Yes, & often the only thing that remains of some "lost" silents is what's on the trailers. If he's thinking of running silents theatrically, the distributor may have new trailers for the movie.

quote:
The one question I can answer is that silent films were photographed at 16 FPS (frames per second) rather than the 24 used for sound today.
This is a modern misunderstanding which deveoped from the silent/sound switch on 16mm projectors. 16mm home movie cameras ran at 16 fps (& were silent, of course). But when theatrical sound titles got printed down to 16mm, they needed to run at 24fps of course. Short label on the switch was silent/sound.

Silent films were shot & run at speeds which could vary even within the movie! As a rule of thumb, earliest silents like from the 'teens ran slowest (around 16 fps) late silents ran faster: 24-26 fps!

A great page about silent film taking & projection speeds is at
http://www.cinemaweb.com/silentfilm/bookshelf/#March1998

quote:
unless they are re-processed with some frames duplicated the action is speeded up considerably.
That is called "stretch printing" & has distracting visual artifacts. The best way is to just project it at the correct speed. "Stretch printing" has been done for different applications - Chaplin stretch printed on of his features so it could be re-released in the sound era, but didn't like the results & preferred it to just run fast. Some silent titles with slower taking speeds were stretch printed to run on video transfer chains.

quote:
As to your Q#2, I got to see a brand new print of the Lon Chaney Phantom of the Opera in 2001 at the Orpheum Theater in Los Angeles. It was made up on a platter and played on the existing booth equipment
Was that the Kevin Brownlow restoration that was done around that time? Brownlow requires that the projector be fitted with equipment to vary the speed in accordance to notes for projection that came with the film originally (or were reconstructed by Brownlow). Kino & some other companies have 35mm prints of Phantom too (it's PD), but it's a late silent, & was taken very near & runs very well at 24fps. Phantom of the Opera is an easy silent show because you just plop it out bloop at 24fps on whatever you got.

 |  IP: Logged

Mitchell Dvoskin
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1869
From: West Milford, NJ, USA
Registered: Jan 2001


 - posted 08-20-2003 08:00 AM      Profile for Mitchell Dvoskin   Email Mitchell Dvoskin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
1. When did nitrate prints stop being used? How long after did they circulate? Any still around?

Kodak discontinued nitrate 1950 (John, correct me if I am wrong), and by 1952 it was not longer being used in the USA. Nitrate film was manufactured in eastern europe up though the 1960's.

2. Can an old projector (with soundhead) play a silent print? Where they standard 35mm? Are new prints being made today of old silent films?

Yes. It will just run at the wrong speed unless you have a variable speed motor, or the print was modified to run at sound speed. Yes, new prints are being struck of the major silent films.

3. Do you know what the reel sizes/lengths were for silent films? The same as sound films?

Originally 1000' reels, but by the early 1920's 2000' reels.

4. Were there any trailers made of silent features?

YES. And some great art deco daters.

5. Do you know, perchance, who distributes silent films today?

In addition to Kino, which really does not have very much, Their is our Library Of Congress (requires reel to reel projection). There are a lot of small distributors. I would click Brad Allen's link, check out the "screenings" section, and call some of those venues and find out where they got their prints. You also may want to try contacting the American Theatre Organ Society ATOS for information.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-20-2003 08:01 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
My findings have been that most "Silent" switches and home movies actually where at 18fps, not 16fps.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 08-20-2003 09:50 AM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve wrote:

quote:

My findings have been that most "Silent" switches and home movies actually where at 18fps, not 16fps.

Are you talking about 8mm?

18 fps is a standard speed for Super8 film, many of the single system magnetic sound on film cameras of that format run at 18fps, to reduce running costs for home use. Some of the cheaper ones only run at that speed. Super8 reduction prints of 35mm or 16mm sound films are, of course, at 24 fps., therefore Super8 sound projectors have to be able to run at both of these fixed speeds.

As for the 'silent' speeds on other guages, it's anybody's guess what they are on most machines. On some, such as the older type Bell & Howell 16mm machines, with commutator motors and governors, they are adjustable.

 |  IP: Logged

Tao Yue
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 209
From: Princeton, NJ
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-20-2003 10:37 AM      Profile for Tao Yue   Author's Homepage   Email Tao Yue   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
William Hooper wrote:

quote:

Turner used to have some of the silent DeMille's, like the silent Ten Commandments.

Wouldn't Paramount still hold the copyright? I'm not aware of any large-scale sale of libraries in the case of Paramount, unlike with Warners and MGM.

As far as Biblical epics at Turner, there are prints of Ben-Hur (1926) available from Warner Brothers. According to alt.movies.silents (a great resource for print info on specific titles), the prints have the 1931 syn-chro-nized soundtrack, not the Carl Davis score that was on the video version of the Brownlow restoration.

If you don't have the proper equipment to show a silent and/or don't have a pianist/organist/100-piece orchestra, your best bet is to stick with new sound-aperture prints from the late silent era. Metropolis, City Lights, Steamboat Bill, Jr., etc. All of these have soundtracks and prints that can be run at 24.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 08-20-2003 11:08 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For anyone interested in nitrate I'd strongly recommend the book This Film is Dangerous, published by the International Federation of Film Archives. Info here.

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Gabel
Film God

Posts: 3873
From: Technicolor / Postworks NY, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 08-20-2003 11:51 AM      Profile for Bill Gabel   Email Bill Gabel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Wouldn't Paramount still hold copyright? I'm not aware of any large-scale sale of libraries in the case of Paramount, unlike Warner & MGM.
During the early 60's, Paramount sold it's pre-49 era films to MCA/Universal Pictures. Currently MCA/Universal have released films from the 30's-49 on video. But Paramount did have a few titles from the silent era on VHS. MCA/Universal handles the early Marx Bros. titles from Paramount and the Preston Sturges and Ernst Lubitsch titles among many other classic Paramount titles. I not know what the earliest date that was from that sale of that library.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.