Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Freaky Friday- short reel (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Freaky Friday- short reel
John T. Hendrickson, Jr
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 889
From: Freehold, NJ, USA
Registered: Apr 2001


 - posted 08-05-2003 04:58 PM      Profile for John T. Hendrickson, Jr   Email John T. Hendrickson, Jr   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joseph Pandolfi wrote in Feature Info and Trailer Attachments:

"Reel 5 is a very short one, about 4 minutes."

And how! Just for fun, I ran it through my old Neumade Film Measuring Machine, and it clocked through at 414 feet.

Reel to reel projectionists will find room on reel #4 if they want to avoid the quick changeover. On the other hand, folks who want to use up their carbon shorts have a great opportunity. [thumbsup] However, upon inspection I found that the last cue is a real bear to see. [Eek!]

This about the shortest reel on a feature that I've seen. Does anyone recall a shorter reel?

 |  IP: Logged

Mike Blakesley
Film God

Posts: 12767
From: Forsyth, Montana
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-05-2003 06:00 PM      Profile for Mike Blakesley   Author's Homepage   Email Mike Blakesley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Why in the heck would they do that when there is room on an adjacent reel?

This might confuse some harried projectionist somewhere who sees that short reel and thinks it's the end of the movie.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 08-05-2003 06:07 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Very short reels that are not the final (or sometimes first) reel usually means some major editing was done after the other reels were locked and it was too late to rebalance the reel changes without difficulty. I had one today that was 93 minutes spread over 7 reels. This might get rearranged before release (there's more than a month to go) but then again maybe not.

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 08-05-2003 06:49 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I may be mistaken but doesn't the film get initially edited down from a 1000 foot rolls then after editing is finished the negatives are cut and assembled into 2000 or less rolls for making release prints.

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Hale
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 123
From: Vancouver, Canada
Registered: Dec 2002


 - posted 08-05-2003 07:06 PM      Profile for Matt Hale   Author's Homepage   Email Matt Hale   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
With all of the features I have been involved with, the 2000 foot reel breaks were set as early as possible. Sometimes a scene moves to keep things even as the cut changes, but by and large its fixed early. Certainly the reels are locked well before it gets to the neg cutter.

One show that I am working on now is a 6 reeler, with two being almost full, and the other four all being between 12 and 15 minutes. It certainly would have fit in 5 reels, but they decided early on in the cut it was going to be 6 so that's the way it is.

A 4 minute reel in the middle certainly sounds suspicious.

 |  IP: Logged

Thomas Procyk
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1842
From: Royal Palm Beach, FL, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 08-06-2003 01:50 AM      Profile for Thomas Procyk   Email Thomas Procyk   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just the opposite, I remember building "The Wall" which was 5 reels filled to the brim. One of the reels had the film actually flush with the edges of the flanges!! It wasn't a "fill-n-hack" job, either because the cue dots were where they should be. You'd think they'd spread it out a little more to protect the film. [Confused]

=TMP=

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-06-2003 07:32 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree. (Over)filling a shipping reel to the point that the film winds beyond the flanges is almost certain to cause shipping damage. Even when secured with proper stiff cardboard bands, the film should not be wound beyond about 1/2-inch below the reel diameter.

 |  IP: Logged

Jonathan Ralston
Film Handler

Posts: 13
From: Cincinnati, OH, USA
Registered: Jul 2003


 - posted 08-09-2003 01:01 AM      Profile for Jonathan Ralston   Email Jonathan Ralston   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sony did a great job with Bad Boys II. Eight reels almost perfectly filled to 1/2 inch below the flange. Makes tearing down pretty easy

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-09-2003 03:58 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just ran GUYS AND DOLLS -- 10 reels, all short. Musicals tend to have short reels because savvy editors don't want to make a reel change in the middle of a song. MY FAIR LADY, if I recall, is 14 reels. But as newer generations mostly familiar with platters take over from the guys & dolls who only knew change-over operation, they may not see the necessity for finding "clean" change-over points as they will be thinking platters -- always a perfect change-over....except of course after a bunch of frames get hacked away by sloppy buildups and breakdowns. And mind you, this is not a slam at platters, but the doofuses who can't break a splice except by chopping off two frames. Therefore change-over guys using long-play reels are not excused by any means.

Frank

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-09-2003 07:37 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Frank,

Actually, you have to consider for older musicals (pre 1980s mostly) that they balanced the reels based on only acetate stock but 4-track magnetic striping. So, even if you have an acetate print, if it isn't striped, it won't fill the reel.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-11-2003 04:50 AM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Right, Steve, and add to that, this print (G&D) was poly which is thinner and so the reels are even less full (by volume, not length)!

Frank

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 08-11-2003 06:53 AM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Clean areas for changeover?

Both prints in 70mm of "Oklahoma" we have screened over the years contained a changeover in the middle of a dance number. The dancers move upstage, BAM, they come back downstage to the front and all of this at 30fps.

There is a "REEL" challenge for you.

KEN

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-11-2003 10:22 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Try Sound of Music has a changeover mid note in the trouble with maria

 |  IP: Logged

Kenneth Wuepper
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1026
From: Saginaw, MI, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 08-11-2003 03:33 PM      Profile for Kenneth Wuepper   Email Kenneth Wuepper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Right on! "The Sound of Music" in 70mm

How about the middle of "If I Were A Rich Man" in Fiddler on the Roof? Also in 70mm

I believe there is a change in the middle of "Dirty" in "Paint Your Wagon" also 70mm.

KEN

 |  IP: Logged

Frank Angel
Film God

Posts: 5305
From: Brooklyn NY USA
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 08-12-2003 01:55 PM      Profile for Frank Angel   Author's Homepage   Email Frank Angel   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
How bout CAMELOT -- end of R1 -- Richard Harris is talk-singing to Vanessa Redgrave and explains that in autumn "the leaves are whisked away at night....of course." Change-Over R2 - Regrave " Of course."

A fie on the guys who run down to low countdown numbers...they loose Vanessa's "Of course."

Frank

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.