Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » hypothetical: Neg-Guard?

   
Author Topic: hypothetical: Neg-Guard?
Matt Hale
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 123
From: Vancouver, Canada
Registered: Dec 2002


 - posted 08-01-2003 06:51 PM      Profile for Matt Hale   Author's Homepage   Email Matt Hale   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Due to a handling error, one reel of original camera negative for a film I am currently involved with (technically, only the A-roll portion of the reel) got very dirty and rather scratched in places. Fortunately through a combination of meticulous hand-cleaning and wet-gate transfer our lab has salvaged the image, and the individual responsible is paying the sizeable bill. However, all this got me thinking. Since Film-Guard is so good with dirt and scratches on prints, is there any reason it wouldn't work on a negative? Has anyone tried this? Just a thought.

 |  IP: Logged

Darryl Spicer
Film God

Posts: 3250
From: Lexington, KY, USA
Registered: Dec 2000


 - posted 08-01-2003 07:19 PM      Profile for Darryl Spicer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
so I guess that blind transfer from the film magazine to the sealed can didn't go over to well.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 08-01-2003 07:55 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
It would work similar, but depending on how the lab handled the printing, it may or may not be a good idea. It would really depend on the lab and such a decision should be their call.

 |  IP: Logged

Matt Hale
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 123
From: Vancouver, Canada
Registered: Dec 2002


 - posted 08-01-2003 08:00 PM      Profile for Matt Hale   Author's Homepage   Email Matt Hale   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I don't actually know the details of the incident. All I know is the print of that reel for our mix was delayed considerably while they cleaned it up. When I finally saw it, there was nothing significantly worse than the other reels so either the cleaner did an amazing job or it wasn't that bad to begin with. It just got me wondering...

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-01-2003 09:19 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For optically printing or telecine transfer of the negative, a refractive index matching treatment like FilmGuard would likely help hide scratches. But in contact printing, any non-volatile material that got on the raw stock would likely have an adverse photographic effect. Long term effects on negative films would need to be independently tested using accelerated Arrhenius testing, perhaps by the RIT Image Permanence Institute.

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 08-01-2003 09:53 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
most labs photoguard the negative after deep cleaning it first to fill in scratchs
The Smitzer Wetgate printer also would be the choice to strike the dupe neg on

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 08-01-2003 10:38 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gordon is correct that the method usually used to eliminate scratches during printing is wet gate printing, either total immersion contact or liquid gate optical. The diffuse illumination (designed and built by Kodak) of the Thompson Spirit DataCine is very forgiving of scratches and surface abrasions, such that a wet gate transfer to video/digital-intermediate is often not required.

In a wet gate, the index-matching solvent evaporates completely (no residue), and the film is dried before it is wound up.

http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/h1/printingP.shtml#wetgate

http://www.rtico.com/bhp/

http://www.mandy.com/1/class3.cfm?id=9395&ar=

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.