my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Best Lens Specification for Short Throw ?

Author Topic: Best Lens Specification for Short Throw ? Kerry Fleming Film Handler Posts: 46 From: Boynton Beach, FL, USA Registered: Mar 2003 posted 03-29-2003 07:36 PM                        I recently aquired a Century model S A projector and have encountered some lens problems. I have a limited throw distance of apx. 20 feet available and want to obtain the biggest picture possible on a 10 foot screen. I have tried a Sankor Deluxe MC (flat) lens (F 2.0 f=50mm 1.97 in.) and can not get focused. Lens bottoms out! The base lens for my scope adapter is a Super Snaplite BX290 (f=1.7). I can focus that lens when used alone. But when I add a B&L scope adpater I can not obatin a completely clear focus. And the picture is much smaller than I would like it to be. I welcome any suggestions or advice you have to offer for obtaining the largest focused picture possible given the constraints of this problem. Thank you for your replies.  |  IP: Logged Pat Moore Master Film Handler Posts: 363 Registered: Mar 2000 posted 03-29-2003 07:51 PM                     Hi Kerry; That 50mm lens should be about right for that screen (assuming 4.5' x 10'). I haven't played that much with Sankors other than some tests against ISCO's. What do you mean, "bottoms out"? You can't get it back close enough to the film? Your scope lens should be around 75mm, but I doubt of the B&L Anamorphic will focus on that short a throw. That might be tough with the newer anamorphics, though I'll say I haven't had to try much at 20ft. Couple other people here may have tried 20ft throws though... Good luck, and welcome! Pat  |  IP: Logged Brad Miller Administrator Posts: 17775 From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall) Registered: May 99 posted 03-29-2003 08:51 PM                     ISCO and Schneider both make lenses that are suitable for your application. I've not had a problem with either focusing down to 20 feet. In fact, I've used both of them down to about 15 feet with no real issues. One recommendation though, sell the Sankor and buy ISCO or Schneider lenses. The difference in quality is really worth it. If you don't have a large budget, check around for used lenses. Regarding your "bottoms out" comment, I am assuming this is a single lens projector. Have you tried mounting the lens in it's holder loose, such that once you insert it into the projector you can reach in with a finger and slide the lens forward of backwards a little? You may have already tried that, but I just don't see where you wouldn't be able to focus a 50mm lens at that throw.  |  IP: Logged Gordon McLeod Film God Posts: 9532 From: Toronto Ontario Canada Registered: Jun 99 posted 03-29-2003 09:06 PM                     For the century Sankor offers a extension ring that moves the back element farther back in a extended 62.5mm tube Centurys are one of the few projectors that lens can sometimes not physically get far enough back in due to the shroud over the tube  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 03-29-2003 09:09 PM                  Brad: I agree... ya can't beat a Schneider! I've done many lens tests over the years; I ***Personally*** think Schneider is the best. Although short-throws do present many problems.... if you keep the magnification to with-in reason, the image will be great! >>> Phil  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-30-2003 01:11 AM                     Phil, It depends on the criteria...ISCO and Schneider both have their strong and weak points....both are substantially better than anything else out there too. As to 20-foot throws...just did one with ISCO Ultra Star Plus series lenses....on a "rear-screen" no less...resolution was exceptional! I believe our 1.85 lens was in the under-40mm range (larger picture than on the one being discussed). I was quite pleased with the results. Steve  |  IP: Logged Paul G. Thompson The Weenie Man Posts: 4718 From: Mount Vernon WA USA Registered: Nov 2000 posted 03-30-2003 02:33 AM                     To re-enforce Steve's comment: Remember....with projection lens issues, you get what you pay for.  |  IP: Logged Phil Hill I love my cootie bug Posts: 7595 From: Hollywood, CA USA Registered: Mar 2000 posted 03-30-2003 05:10 PM                  I agree both have their good and bad points. I have found that in the shorter focal lengths like 24-35mm, the Isco has more edge chromatic aberration than the Schneider. I find the ISCO to be "sharper" in the center as compared to the Schneider in that focal range. But that seems to work against you in that it tends to show the magnified film grain a "little" too much and detracts from the image. Just my personal preference. And Paul, you usually get what you pay for in most things you buy....um except monster wire....but that's a different topic >>> Phil  |  IP: Logged Steve Guttag We forgot the crackers Gromit!!! Posts: 12814 From: Annapolis, MD Registered: Dec 1999 posted 03-31-2003 12:55 AM                     Chromatic abberations are also often due to poor lamphouse alignment and/or reflector design. I've had no problems with the ISCO line on short focal lengths (nor Schneider). The annoying thing about the newer generation of ISCO and Schneider lenses is that they tend to look around the aperture plate! The "fringe" area is huge. Steve  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.