Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Cat 702?? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Cat 702??
Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 01-05-2003 09:20 AM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dolby has a Cat 702 soundhead on their website. It looks the same as the 701. How is it different?

 |  IP: Logged

Jean-Michel Grin
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 222
From: Geneva & Lausanne, Switzerland
Registered: Jul 2002


 - posted 01-05-2003 10:08 AM      Profile for Jean-Michel Grin   Author's Homepage   Email Jean-Michel Grin   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Maybe the red Led illumination device ?

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 01-05-2003 10:12 AM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It is like the BACP/USL penthouse since the 702 does not require an internal power supply and cord....the power for the LED and pre-amplifier is tapped from the voltage rails from the digital cable...a sharing of technology even if they do not publicly admit the source [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-05-2003 10:24 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Another "borrowed" idea is that it has "go/nogo" LEDs that are visible through the cover to indicate if the LED level is sufficient

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-05-2003 10:27 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Indeed, you are right. Dolby reportedly made a deal with Jack Cashin to use the design as well as some of Jacks Light meter stuff in the 650 to make it track SRD better. Of course, Dolby has to be at least a tiny bit competitive to be able to sell product.....
Mark @ CLACO

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-05-2003 11:35 AM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To bad USL/BACP never followed through with the original idea of their penthouse having the both SRD pickup and a DTS timecode reader allon the same unit

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-05-2003 12:14 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I wonder if thats covered by some still valid DTS patent?
Mark

 |  IP: Logged

Christos Mitsakis
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 242
From: Ag.Paraskevi, ATHENS, GREECE
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 01-05-2003 02:02 PM      Profile for Christos Mitsakis   Email Christos Mitsakis   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So has the time come for Cat701 to pass to history?
As I understand, for some time Dolby will have both in catalogue. If you have to choose now a penthouse DD head which of the two would you choose 701 or 702? Or should you also consider USL/BACP?
Indeed, less wires the better, but I have to say that I am happy with Cat700 and 701.

Christos

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-05-2003 04:06 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think the 701 is history. In a free marketplace, you should always feel free to chose whomever's product you feel gives you the best value/performance.

As to the lack of DTS...the rumor was to having the Dolby license (and hence, supply of the CCD board) they couldn't make a combo reader. If the rumor is true, it was a dumb stipulation since if someone was to buy the reader, they would have a Dolby Digital system in there anyway.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Ken Lackner
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1907
From: Atlanta, GA, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 01-05-2003 04:18 PM      Profile for Ken Lackner   Email Ken Lackner   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is USL/BACP?

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 01-05-2003 04:27 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
USL= Ultra Stereo Labs
BACP= Bay Area Cinema Products

 |  IP: Logged

Richard Fowler
Film God

Posts: 2392
From: Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA
Registered: Jun 2001


 - posted 01-05-2003 04:28 PM      Profile for Richard Fowler   Email Richard Fowler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
BACP is Bay Area Cinema Products, which is run by Sam Chavez who until the early 1990's did cinema marketing for Dolby. He is one of the key people who pushed the LED reverse scan idea which is now common. After leaving Dolby he was for a while at Component Engineering before setting up BACP. USL is Ultra Stereo Labs which manufacture BACP product in a joint partnership with Jack Cashin, the only other man to get an Academy Award for optical sound improvement in addition to Ray Dolby. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 01-06-2003 12:44 AM      Profile for Rick Long   Email Rick Long   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sorry, slightly off topic but....

I did a search for this, honest, but couldn't find the answer. Anyways this seemed like a good as any topic to dump this in.

I have a few 701's which do not give out the required level (this after led power supply adjustment). This causes me to think that the l.e.d.'s are a little old. Are these l.e.d.'s field replaceable?

A few other units have failed also giving no output whatsoever, causing me to think the CCD board has failed. I notice that the CCD itself is installed in a socket. Is the CCD the likely suspect and if so, can it be replaced in the field or should the whole board be replaced?

Out of desparation, I tried putting a CCD board from a 701 into a 700 sound-head. I had to reduce the links to the X1 position to drop the signal level, but it seemed to work ok although there did seem to be a little resistance to dropping to SR on the loop splice.

I should mention that these tests were all done in a shop with the same Dolby (CP-500) test jig.

Thanks in advance, for any help.

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-06-2003 07:57 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The RED LEDs have dimmed to the point of being unusable. God you just gotta love the visible red LEDs...more unstable than an exciter lamp at seven times the price!

The LEDs are field changeable. The LED itself is available (you'll need to be handy with a soldering iron) or by changing the whole head assembly out.

Steve

 |  IP: Logged

Rick Long
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 759
From: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 01-06-2003 09:12 AM      Profile for Rick Long   Email Rick Long   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thank you, Steve. Warming up my 100-watt American Beauty as we speak. [Wink]

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.