my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Dowser Mfg. Corp. ?

Author Topic: Dowser Mfg. Corp. ? David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 11-19-2002 09:12 PM                        EDIT: Thread topic has been renamed. Was "Dowser vs. Douser" but that proved to be sensitive. Thank goodness for the new rename feature or I'd never live down that lapse in my judgement. While searching for something on Google, I stumbled across a web site that reminded me of another thread that went off-topic and became a debate about whether it's "dowser" or "douser". I found this: Dowser Mfg. reference #1 The caption for the first photo says quote: Each projector has a Dowser Manufacturing Corp. automatic shutter control, Pat. No. 923042, serial numbers 5321 an 5322 So I searched Google on "Dowser Manufacturing Corp" (also "Mfg") and came up with this: Dowser Mfg. reference #2 quote: ...Presto Changeover Auto Shutter controls, manufactured by Dowser Mfg. Corp. New York. I don't recall anyone mentioning a company named "Dowser Mfg Corp" making projector equipment. But this does seem to suggest that the correct spelling is "dowser", not "douser". For what it's worth. I just thought this was kind of interesting.  |  IP: Logged Michael Schaffer "Where is the Boardwalk Hotel?" Posts: 4143 From: Boston, MA Registered: Apr 2002 posted 11-19-2002 09:18 PM                        My Encyclopaedia Britannica says both spellings are correct, neither of them being specifically American or British.  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 11-19-2002 09:30 PM                        A way of spelling a word can make it into common use just by, well, being used a lot. "Douser" may be an accepted spelling after this many years have elapsed. I'm wondering if "Dowser Mfg. Corp" took its name from the part they were manufacturing, or if the part was named after the company that designed it. Like was there someone named Joe Dowser who designed this patented component and named it after himself.  |  IP: Logged John Hawkinson Film God Posts: 2273 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 11-19-2002 09:34 PM                     Why do we have to rehash this again? Wasn't it enough in the thread Christie P35GS Dowser Question? In any case, it should be clear that when there are two spellings of a word, one particular company choosing to use one of them hardly means that the other spelling is incorrect. There are reasonable arguments on both sides, 'nuff said. --jhawk  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 11-19-2002 09:39 PM                        The reason I started this thread was not to debate the spelling, it was to point out that there was a "Dowser Mfg. Corp." involved in making projection equipment. Sorry if I stepped over some kind of line. I should have realized that it might be humiliating to a professional such as yourself to learn something about your industry from a non-professional such as me. What was I thinking. I know there are some people here who hate the fact that non-professionals are allowed to join Film-Tech. Is that what's going on here? Brad should maybe kick me out if I'm that obnoxious. I can go join Andrew McCrea over at bigscreenbiz. I never said "douser" is incorrect either.  |  IP: Logged John Hawkinson Film God Posts: 2273 From: Cambridge, MA, USA Registered: Feb 2002 posted 11-19-2002 10:49 PM                     Well, one big downside of being able to rename topics is when the thread seems to be about the topic title and then it gets renamed. David, I could care less whether you're "professional" or not; I am rather unclear on why it is interesting that there is such a company, perhaps I am simply a crotchety grumpy person. It has been suggested before. --jhawk  |  IP: Logged David Stambaugh Film God Posts: 4021 From: Eugene, Oregon Registered: Jan 2002 posted 11-19-2002 10:59 PM                        After the lengthy "dowser" vs. "douser" debate, it seemed interesting to me that there was a company called "Dowser Mfg. Corp." making projection equipment. Maybe it's not so interesting after all.  |  IP: Logged Ken Layton Phenomenal Film Handler Posts: 1452 From: Olympia, Wash. USA Registered: Sep 1999 posted 11-19-2002 11:29 PM                     Dowser Mfg. Co. made picture changeover units for various brands of projector heads much the same as Strong made the "Zipper" changeover before Essannay Electric took over. From what I have seen, the modern Kelmar changeover is very close in design to the Dowser Mfg. Co. unit. One theater I know of has 2 black Simplex XL's with these Dowser Mfg changeovers on them (still working I might add). I have yet to find any manuals, parts lists, or instruction sheets for these units. If I ever do run across any paper on these changeovers, I'll copy it off and send it in for the manuals section here.  |  IP: Logged Robert Throop Master Film Handler Posts: 412 From: Vernon, NY USA Registered: Jun 99 posted 11-20-2002 09:18 AM                     The Dowser Manufacturing Company made Thide changeovers from the late twenties till the early sixties. They were later made by Dave Corbett Projection Products.  |  IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

Hop To: Select a Forum: Category: Operations -------------------- Digital Cinema Forum Film Handlers' Forum Large Format Forum Ground Level Feature Info, Trailer Attachments & REAL Credit Offsets Category: Community -------------------- Film-Yak Film Handlers' Movie Reviews The Afterlife Bob Maar's Joke-A-Thon Category: Classified -------------------- Equipment and Supplies Wanted/For Sale Help Wanted/Seeking Employment Category: System -------------------- Software Beta Testing Forum

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.