Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » booth regionalisms? (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: booth regionalisms?
Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-25-2002 07:18 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gordon's mention of the popularity of Strong platters in his area reminded me of something that I've been meaning to ask for a while:

What are some regional trends in booth design, and is there any reason for them?

For example, I've noticed that changeover booths in New England commonly use a single pushbutton to activate picture and sound; footpedals are uncommon. By contrast, separate footpedals (for picture) and pushbuttons (for sound) seemed to be quite common when I was living in Virginia.

As another example, I've been told that rewind benches on the west coast commonly have footpedal speed controls, while I've never seen this anywhere on the east coast.

There's also the equipment factor--Strong platters being common in one area and Christies in others, etc.

Has anyone else noticed anything like this?

 |  IP: Logged

Jon Bartow
Master Film Handler

Posts: 287
From: Massachusetts
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 10-25-2002 08:38 AM      Profile for Jon Bartow   Email Jon Bartow   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It also is dependant on what chains are present in a particular area. For example, one chain in my area uses Century proj, Christie consoles and platters with Dolby processors and Ashly amps with JBL speakers almost without exception. While another has mostly Christie proj, Strong platters, Smart processors and a very interesting array of lamphouses, amps and speakers.
All of the changeover booths that I have seen around here (Michigan) have one button for sound/douser c/o control (that is one button at each proj. Also, no foot pedal control for rewind benches.
One trend that I would guess is universal: Very poorly lit booths from the point of view of anyone who has to do more than thread. Only one theater that I service has enough light available in the booth so that I don't have to use my flashlight to do a PM.
Jonathan

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 10-25-2002 09:27 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, Scott, we have footpedal speed controls on all of our benches.

I don't see how you could manage otherwise! One hand on the brake for the supply reel, one hand to check the film, how would you be able to
control the speed of the film without a third hand?

As for single-pushbotton versus footpedal+pushbutton for changeover, umm, why would you ever want to design a system that let you changeover sound and picture independantly? That seems like asking for trouble!

--jhawk


 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 10-25-2002 09:42 AM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I've always preferred a seperate right-off-left paddle for sound change-over. It comes in handy when you find out that the cue marks on the reel aren't actually projected, for one reason or another. When this happens you can shut the sound off so you don't hear the tail-out or the countdown and you can blacken the screen (while the next reel counts down) by whatever method/combination of changeover shutter and/or hand douser that you want.

Or course if you didn't get prints, sometimes, five minutes after the show was supposed to start, you could check the cue marks and you wouldn't have this problem.

Then again you could do what the owner of the D/I, that I run at one night a summer, does. Thread up on the picture, hit the motor 7 seconds after the motor que and immediately do the changeover. Boy do I hate that. He claims that you see the countdown if you thread up on the numbers.


 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 10-25-2002 11:43 AM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Daryl, how does that work? Do you have two 3-position switches, one on each projector, or is there a central switch somewhere?

Our custom automation system has a single button that normally changes over sound and picture, but if it is pressed a second time, it closes the Zipper and turns off the sound. So if there's a changeover error (due to incorrect cues or operator error or whatever), pressing the changeover button a second time gets you happy nothingness, and then pressing it a third time changes back over. (Our system has auxilliary controls to override this, but they're rarely used...)

--jhawk


 |  IP: Logged

Christopher Seo
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 530
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-25-2002 02:23 PM      Profile for Christopher Seo   Email Christopher Seo   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I like changeover booths that have, in addition to normal changeover buttons, an "all close" button for ending the show. Of course having remote faders with a mute button at each projector would be nice too; that would eliminate a need for separate picture and sound changeovers per se.

John,
As for how you manage without a footpedal speed control? Not easily. It certainly sucks but manufacturers don't seem to pay attention to real-world conditions.


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 10-25-2002 02:51 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Booth layout and equipment choices tend to be uniform among particular chains. Big/loyal customers can sometimes negotiate favorable deals, discounts and terms. Consistency makes training easier, and requires less spare parts inventory. Mergers and acquistions complicate things (e.g., Regal/Edwards/UA and AMC/GCC).

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: here


 |  IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 10-25-2002 04:06 PM      Profile for Manny Knowles   Email Manny Knowles   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Why would you ever want to design a system that let you changeover sound and picture independantly? That seems like asking for trouble!

With separate controls for picture (foot pedal) and sound (pushbutton) the operator has the option to take advantage of the audio pull-up and switch over to the incoming track a few seconds ahead of engaging picture on the new projector. It's based on an old editing trick: Edits are more noticeable when picture and sound are both cut together.


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-25-2002 04:31 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
In reference to the original question, Jon and John have really hit the nail on the head on point #1. Let's say you have a large chain. If you were to change your equipment with every location, your techs would have to be trained in on a lot more equipment and the option of running down the highway to the next theater in the chain to borrow a part would be out of the question. An excellent example of this is Cinemark. For YEARS they bought Simplex projectors, CFS consoles and SPECO platters. It would have been effortless for them to upgrade that CFS decision by purchasing Strong consoles with those Simplex projectors, but they never did (except in the locations nearby the Strong plant). They did have a year or two where they tinkered around with other options like Century projectors and Eprad platters, etc. In the end, they ended up putting in an all-Christie package, which they still use today. Maybe after a few years they will change to Kinoton, or Strong. Who knows, but whatever it is it will certainly be across the board.

Point #2 The other thing I have noticed is that if a given dealer/service company is comfortable with a certain set of equipment, they will put it in every time and for those customers that are not convinced, they will do their damndest to convince them. This makes things easier on their techs because they generally only have to deal with one kind of setup and it gets them better profit margins as they give all of their business to one manufacturer of cinema equipment. Plus, certain brands of equipment (like Strong inparticular) in their pre-wire status makes installation a joke. The installation tech has almost nothing to do, so they can get in and out of there and still collect lots of money. So in this form, if there is a company X that covers most of Maine and they love Strong equipment, you will find Strong equipment all throughout Maine, whether it is the best equipment for the particular job or not.

To the other John, you are still using a rewind with a brake? Get yourself a Kelmar RTV series rewind bench and do it right. Improper braking can damage film.

I think we have more Johns on this forum than Scotts.


 |  IP: Logged

Daryl C. W. O'Shea
Film God

Posts: 3977
From: Midland Ontario Canada (where Panavision & IMAX lenses come from)
Registered: Jun 2002


 - posted 10-25-2002 06:10 PM      Profile for Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Author's Homepage   Email Daryl C. W. O'Shea   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
John, I've used the three position 'paddle' in about three different ways.

1. Tube amplifier, paddle at each projector is connected by a long steel rod that runs through the amp and through a single three position switch. The switch switches between (a) right proj solar cell, (b) shorted to mute amp, (c) left proj solar cell. This is probably my most favorite changeover setup (can't beat the tube amp).

2. Using a digital processor and the same switch setup as above with rod, etc. removed from old tube amp. This time the switch is wired (changeover latched, not pulsed) (a) right proj circuit closed, (b) mute circuit closed or unused depending on processor, (c) left proj circuit closed.

3. Using a digital processor or tube amp or anything else. Three positon switch (or two pos. with no muteing - either right or left) wired to a bunch of relays or transistors that either pulse or latch the processor or switch the solar cell outputs.

With the third setup the switch is always being thrown in the opposite direction as last time, whereas the first 2 the switch is always up/right, middle/mute, down/left.

If there's an error, you simply don't open the hand douser until you know you're going to have a picture to show. This way you don't have to switch over before you can close the c/o shutter and mute the sound.

Also most c/o shutter buttons I've used around here are mounted in the pedastal, with the sound c/o to your right on the wall or amp. Motor switches seem to vary from pedestal mounted to wall mounted. I've only seen one c/o shutter foot switch at a drive-in (Elmvale, Ont. I think - which has nice comfy chairs to sit in and do the c/o).

As for equipment, from the Cineplex Odeon multiplexes (in Canada) that I've seen, they like (liked) to use Strong A3 platters and Cinemeccanica V5's. For sound they usually have a mix of DTS, SDDS and Dolby.

Having the same equipment throughout a chain might also indicate to head office a theatre that has more problems than they should, possibly due to inexperienced operators, etc., rather than 'I guess they got the bad brand of equipment'.


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 10-25-2002 07:28 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Personally, I've always preferred separate picture and sound changeovers...that has the most flexibility. However, I find that I install mostly linked picture and sound changeovers. In fact, we have made custom boards to do just that with certain projectors that are not as friendly to the concept.

Around here, footpedals were the preferred method of picture changeover by a long shot. Nowadays, I tend to use toggle switches (on)-off-(on) to allow switching to ether projector from either projector for those systems that use the traditional zipper/kelmar style of changeover.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-25-2002 07:53 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
In the Zipporama screening room that no longer exists (pics in the warehouse), the installer used "designer" wall switches...the kind that you only push about 1/8 of an inch and the switch itself is about an inch wide by 3 inches tall. At first I didn't like the idea, but after thinking about it, that sort of switch can make things more exacting on the changeover. The time it takes to throw a conventional switch can easily pass another frame in the gate, whereas these switches would be about as instant as possible.

Of course the WEIRD part about that installation was that the "changeovers" were accomplished by turning the xenons on and off simultaneously. Basically the installer took the safety interlock switch and cross wired them across two switches placed side by side. The contactor was latched on both rectifiers and when the switches were thrown, the ignitor zapped the incoming lamphouse and the safety switch killed the exiting lamphouse. There were no dousers.

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 10-25-2002 09:51 PM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brad: how would that even work? What about the time it takes for the lamp to strike? And why would you want to re-strike the lamps every 20 minutes? Seems like a waste....

I much prefer to have separate controls for picture and sound changeover; it's very useful when, for example, a print arrives without original head and tail leaders, where one would want to change the picture just under a second before the sound in order to avoid a drop to silence. It's also useful for films which have walk-in/walk-out music. Unfortunately, pretty much every booth around here uses a single control for both. But this is really a different topic.

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 10-25-2002 10:43 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Note that I never said I thought it was a good idea to continually strike the lamps like that. Amazingly enough, the changeovers were pretty close to seamless.

 |  IP: Logged

John Hawkinson
Film God

Posts: 2273
From: Cambridge, MA, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 10-25-2002 11:58 PM      Profile for John Hawkinson   Email John Hawkinson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ah, the Kelmar RTV series. Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't that place the reels and the film over the side of the bench? I suppose that's necessary with larger than 2000' reels, but it sure seems inconvenient.

It looks like you have to drag the film at an odd angle to splice (or holder the splicer over air). And I can't imagine how you'd run the film through a frame counter.

Or does the table extend out in the middle?

--jhawk


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.