Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE: Lens Size Question

my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home

»	Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE » Operations » Film Handlers' Forum » Lens Size Question

Author

Topic: Lens Size Question

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002

posted 09-17-2002 10:36 PM

Will a 50mm lens by one brand produce the same image size as a 50mm by another manufacturer?

I'm about to replace some lenses here and it's just occured to me that there may be some funky detail that I never knew about here.

They ought to be equal, right?

| IP: Logged

Christopher Seo
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 530
From: Los Angeles, CA
Registered: Jun 99

posted 09-17-2002 10:47 PM

I second that question.

Moreover, if replacing an old lens specified in inches and fractional inches, can one simply convert to millimeters and get the closest millimeter size?

| IP: Logged

Aaron Sisemore
Flaming Ribs beat Reeses Peanut Butter Cups any day!

Posts: 3061
From: Rockwall TX USA
Registered: Sep 1999

posted 09-17-2002 11:08 PM

Yes, a 50mm primary lens will throw the exact same size image, whether it was made by Isco, Schneider, Sankor, Kowa, etc. Picture quality may differ however.

And yes, convert inch lenses to millimeters and go with the nearest millimeter lens size UNDER what you come up with.

Example: you convert inches to mm and it comes up 62mm: Since nobody makes a 62mm lens (most are in 5mm increments, though there are always one-off exceptions and 'custom grinds' as well) you would use a 60mm lens, as a 65mm may throw too small of an image. As always, your mileage may vary.

-Aaron

| IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999

posted 09-18-2002 06:19 AM

Actually, not all lenses marked the same will put out the same size image. The focal lengths are nominal. It is easier to catalog in nice 5mm or 2.5mm increments (.25" increments in yesteryear) but the design of the lens may have the focal length off by a millimeter either way. Also, some lens manufacturers are better than others, within a brand if you line up 10 units of the same model and focal length lens, you will get different magnifications just due to manufacturing tolerences. Most people don't notice or care. The guy setting the masking and the guy building the theatre is normally the weak point.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

| IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 09-18-2002 07:36 AM

I agree with Steve. If you fiddle around with the Schneider Lens calculator, you might notice that just a little with a different style - even though it is the same manufacturer. Either that, or I just plain goofed up.

But, it is "close enough for government work"

| IP: Logged

Manny Knowles
"What are these things and WHY are they BLUE???"

Posts: 4247
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Registered: Feb 2002

posted 09-18-2002 08:02 AM

Paul...that's hysterical. I thought that expression was unique to The Bahamas. I never heard it in all the time I lived in the U.S.

Over here, the expression is..."good enough for the government."

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 09-18-2002 08:27 AM

Standard SMPTE 243M specifies: "The actual focal length shall not differ from the marked value on the lens by more than +/- 1%."

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

| IP: Logged

Martin Brooks
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 900
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: May 2002

posted 09-18-2002 10:45 AM

And the formula is FW=DA
where
F=Focal length of the lens in inches
W=Width of the image in feet
D=Distance from the screen in feet
A=Aperture in inches.

| IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000

posted 09-18-2002 12:03 PM

Here are links to the lens calculator programs from IscoOptic and Schneider:
http://www.iscooptic.de/english/downloads/indexdown.php
http://www.schneideroptics.com/software/theatre_design_pro/

Or for "do it yourself" formulae:
http://www.edmundoptics.com/techsupport/DisplayArticle.cfm?articleid=251
http://www.mellesgriot.com/products/optics/ch1-00.asp

| IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000

posted 09-18-2002 03:28 PM

I just remember a few basic aperture parameters and re-derive the formulae as needed, keeping in mind it's a fraction and to keep FL and aperture dimensions in like units, and throw and screen dimensions in the same units. I know aperture specs in inches so I'll convert the FL's from mm by dividing by 25.4. Throw and aperture dimensions make the picture bigger as they get larger so they go on top of the fraction. FL makes the picture smaller as it gets bigger so that goes on the bottom. That and a "2" multiplier when dealing with Scope widths and it's all you need.

| IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000

posted 09-18-2002 04:23 PM

An easy to figure the lens size is:

Throw divided by the height of the image, then multiply that by the aperature size.

This formula does not take the vertical or horizontal projection angles into consideration. It is just for a "Head on" shot. If there are goofy angles, it would be best to use the lens calculator program. Those variables are built in to the programs in most cases.

Manny, that expression I used is common in the military service where we were always expected to do so much with so little for so long, we could practically do anything with nothing.

| IP: Logged

All times are Central (GMT -6:00)

Printer-friendly view of this topic

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.