Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » No more holes every 5 perfs?

   
Author Topic: No more holes every 5 perfs?
John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 09-07-2002 05:46 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ran some DTS 70mm .... no holes. Did they stop putting them on because they felt the the DTS track "tells" you which end is heads/tails? It was on Vision Premiere stock.

I thought it was handy to have them for splicing reasons.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-07-2002 07:01 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The tiny round marker hole every 5th perforation was discontinued a few years ago. It was found to be a potential source of raw stock dirt, as the punch and die used to make it was so small and hard to hold a sharp cutting edge. 70mm labs and major 70mm customers were consulted in making this decision.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-07-2002 08:42 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It was a great idea since even the best equipped booths are not likely to have a 70mm synchronizer or 1-gang "film measuring machine." Would have been great on 35mm too. Of course the labs stopped threading up in frame long ago but looking for the offset worked fine.

Just as sacred but a bit less holy


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-08-2002 12:33 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hmmm so Kodak's 70mm stock is not in compliance with SMPTE guidelines?...for shame.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-08-2002 06:45 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve: Does anyone else still punch the hole? Or even still supply 70mm print film as a catalog item?

SMPTE 119 says the hole was "used for positioning audio records on release prints" for magnetic sound. You can SEE a DTS track, and you can SEE the picture, so the holes are not the only guide to threading a projector correctly.

Labs still have the option of edgeprinting the EASTMAN 65mm KEYKODE numbers from the printing negative, which has latent image marks every 5 perfs:
EASTMAN 65mm KEYKODE

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-08-2002 11:31 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
One would think the silver recovery from the chad would offset the costs of punching the holes.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 09-08-2002 11:36 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It was not done to save money, it was done to improve quality (less raw stock dirt).

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 09-08-2002 12:36 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No the reel reason is kodak donated the punches to the voting machines in florida to deal with there chads

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-08-2002 02:39 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I dunno if anyone else does comply with the standard or not. The Frame line identifier (the little round hole) was a multi-use item. It was on the inboard side and on the frame line.

The fact is, not having the hole puts the stock out of SMPTE compliance.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-08-2002 04:42 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just searched through a lot of samples to find a single one that was printed in alignment and that was probably just a lucky 1 chance in 5 accident. Even the SMPTE RP91 (70PA) was not in register. SMPTE not in compliance with SMPTE? Egads!

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-08-2002 05:46 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sad to say Steve...that would be predictable (SMPTE not in compliance with SMPTE).

As to films actually correct with the frame-line identifier...it really depended on the lab. Deluxe in the states was horrible...they bi-directionally printed so at least half of the reels had the hole on the wrong side.

Technicolor-London seemed VERY good about adhearing to it. I think the last film of their's I played was THE LAST EMPEROR and it, on all of its many reels, adheared to the identifier to the inoboard side and right on the frame line.

If you have any of the old 70-APAL film, it was always correct too.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 09-08-2002 06:47 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is the 70mm test film an optical printer original or a print?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 09-08-2002 08:56 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
70-PA (aka RP-91) is a dupe...sad to say. It is quite apparent when looking at the resolution targets.

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.