Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Problems, not sure why. (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Problems, not sure why.
Brent Arnold
Film Handler

Posts: 20
From: Grapevine, TX, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-05-2002 11:48 PM      Profile for Brent Arnold   Email Brent Arnold   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Tonight I showed Doctor Zhivago, everyone left happy though I deffinently didnt.

The film is long, over 3 hours, after about 2 hours into the movie, the loop after the intermitent dissapeared, and then the extra slack went on the the other side of the next roller. Also, the roller at the bottom of the projector, before going to the platter came off of alignment, so the film was going against bare metal. It wasnt emulsion side, and the film was running, so I decided I would keep it rolling. Then after aboutt 10-15 minutes of that, the film was constantly going in and out of focus, usually the focus knob would fix it, but then the last time I had to focus it... the focus knob didnt, I couldnt turn the focus knob anymore, so I decided I would losen the lens, and pull it out ever so slightly, so that fixed it, eventually. Then as fate would have it, there was no tension up to the platter, boom failsafe took in to effect, and then the projector went off (as expeccted). But I am wondering what caused the loop to "shift" like that, I believe it was right at a splice, and if not right at, right around... but at it would make more sense. So what could of caused this overall problem, and what could I do to prevent this in the future.

What it almost looked like was that it came off the sprockets on the sprocket after the intermitent, but then why did it run the first couple hours fine?

(BTW I have an old century projector, I believe a JJ)

Thank you so much, I know I have had lots of questions recently, but, hey, thats how I learn I guess.

Thank You.

Brent Arnold

 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-05-2002 11:52 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
It was a bad splice, possibly coupled with improper pad roller clearance. Always make it a point to hand inspect every foot of every film before you run it...especially if it is a used print. When inspecting, gently squeeze the edges of the film together and do NOT rub the center of the picture with your thumb and finger (like some bad operators do).

 |  IP: Logged

Brent Arnold
Film Handler

Posts: 20
From: Grapevine, TX, USA
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-06-2002 12:04 AM      Profile for Brent Arnold   Email Brent Arnold   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
A little smudge never hurt anyone!

But the thing is I did a pre-screening (for myself) to make sure it was fine... and it was.

So that is why a bad splice seems kind of out of the question. But I didnt clean the gate between this showing but I cleaned it not too long ago (maybe 2 other films ran through it)

How do I adjust the pad roller clearance.

 |  IP: Logged

Jamie Sanson
Film Handler

Posts: 33
From: Port Macquarie,NSW, Australia
Registered: Feb 2002


 - posted 07-06-2002 07:17 AM      Profile for Jamie Sanson   Email Jamie Sanson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I to would say a bad splice,may be not yours.You just never know with bad splices when they will pay up.It could also be a broenken spocket some were.

 |  IP: Logged

Leo Enticknap
Film God

Posts: 7474
From: Loma Linda, CA
Registered: Jul 2000


 - posted 07-06-2002 10:39 AM      Profile for Leo Enticknap   Author's Homepage   Email Leo Enticknap   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
If this is an older triacetate print then the stock will be more brittle than modern stock. This will exacerbate any perforation damage, i.e. the slightest torn, nicked, stretched or otherwise deformed perforation could get caught in a sprocket tooth resulting in a loop being lost.

You need to be really anal in checking for perf damage in an older print. The odd perf can probably be taped over, but for any sustained damage, operate an 'if in doubt, cut it out' policy. Also, some projectors are more tolerant than others of perf damage, and I guess you'll gradually get used to what you can get away with and what not. For example, an FP-20 is extremely kind, and in my experience will run a print that ought not to be showable. A GK-37, on the other hand, is very unforgiving - the slightest perf damage will cause a snarl-up, and anything other than a perfect join will break under the pressure from the sound lay-on rollers (they're similar to the pinch rollers on a Dolby CAT700 digital pickup, only the pressure is much higher). I've never used a Century JJ and so could not comment.


 |  IP: Logged

Brad Miller
Administrator

Posts: 17775
From: Plano, TX (36.2 miles NW of Rockwall)
Registered: May 99


 - posted 07-06-2002 05:38 PM      Profile for Brad Miller   Author's Homepage   Email Brad Miller       Edit/Delete Post 
Brent, where do you work? Can you find out for sure what kind of projector head you have and what kind of platter? Odds are you have a roller out of alignment in the takeup chain of your platter, or as was mentioned already, you threaded the soundhead with too much tension. What happens is you screened the print and the splice that was just barely hanging together for dear life in the first place made it through, but once it got twisted during takeup it caused it to stretch noticeably to the point where it could not make it through again. Many platters are by design or setup capable of doing this, especially platters with super high takeup tension. It could also be the way you are twisting the film. For example, a SPECO LP270 with it's original elevator design does not like it when the soundtrack is away from the post on takeup when you are running to the top platter. As the movie progresses, you will stretch the film more and more. Each booth is different and there are not any "rules" of how to thread the film that will work in every booth. Whoever trained you may not truly know what he is doing and you have unknowingly picked up his mistakes.

Give us some details and describe the layout of your booth please.


 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 07-06-2002 07:50 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I also think you hit a bad or otherwise crappy splice, or some ripped out sprocket perfs. Some people splice over the splicing tape, and sometimes those splices will derail because they are too thick and won't flex enough when passing through rollers and traps. Upon passing through the gate, the gate tension may a little tighter than normal, causing the intermittant sprocket to strip out or severely strain and damage a batch of sprocket perfs on the film.

I ran across one just the other week where someone used a hunk of splicing tape and just wrapped it around the film. No sprocket holes or nothing! Supposedly, it was a "repair of an out-of-frame" splice from the previous night's screening, and I didn't check it before I ran it. Result was I had a shut-down.

Needless to say, the Simplex XL didn't like that splice. It popped two pad rollers, and derailed itself in the soundhead.

The only machine I know of that would handle something like that would be an old Brenkert.

Brenkerts Rule!


 |  IP: Logged

Gordon McLeod
Film God

Posts: 9532
From: Toronto Ontario Canada
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-06-2002 08:38 PM      Profile for Gordon McLeod   Email Gordon McLeod   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Motiograph AAA will run anything with a picture on it

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 07-07-2002 01:00 AM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gordon, "Pbpthbpthbthpbpthbpthbthp!"

I know you like Moshees, I wish I had that booth of yours.

I will admit they are good machines.


 |  IP: Logged

Peter Kerchinsky
Master Film Handler

Posts: 326
From: Seattle, WA, USA
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 07-07-2002 05:06 AM      Profile for Peter Kerchinsky   Email Peter Kerchinsky   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Paul
You've got to be kidding. BRENKERTS RULE?
To me they are the original moving picture machine!
The picture moves left to right all the time.......

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 07-07-2002 06:48 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Brent Arnold said: "...the loop after the intermitent dissapeared, and then the extra slack went on the the other side of the next roller. Also, the roller at the bottom of the projector, before going to the platter came off of alignment, so the film was going against bare metal. It wasnt emulsion side, and the film was running, so I decided I would keep it rolling."

I know you felt that "the show must go on". But this is one of those cases where "Film Done Right" would say you stop the projector, correct the lost loop, and recheck the film path. The film "going against bare metal" probably left permanent base-side (black) scratches on the print.

If it makes you feel better, I once had a splice break just prior to the take-up reel early in one of the reels of GWTW, and found a few minutes of film spilling onto the floor. Rather than interrupt the show for a few minutes to put the film on a new takeup reel, I ran the entire reel onto the dirty floor of the drive-in booth. Using proper technique, I was able to wind the "spaghetti" back onto a reel without tangling or causing additional film damage. But I still feel guilty for getting the reel dirty by not doing "the right thing". (These were the ancient days before good film cleaners).

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-07-2002 10:51 AM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gord said...."Motiograph AAA will run anything with a picture on it"
Hey Gord, I have toilet paper with pictures on it, I'll be up next week and we'll see whats on it.

Actually I met a guy that used to be an engineer at Motiograph a number of years ago that hated the thing. He also said they never got rid of the flicker in them. Something caused by the barrel shutter, and all the excess gearing in the mechanism. He also mentioned that when the mechanism developed excess gear backlash form wear that it was really noticable.
I service a 5 screen and a single screen that has AA's and I have yet to see the flicker that he was talking about. These are all running with Super Lume-Ex's. I sure do hate changing those shutter bearings though.
Mark @ GTS

 |  IP: Logged

Scott Norwood
Film God

Posts: 8146
From: Boston, MA. USA (1774.21 miles northeast of Dallas)
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 07-07-2002 11:16 AM      Profile for Scott Norwood   Author's Homepage   Email Scott Norwood   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
So are there any theatres in the New England area that still have Motiographs? I know of a couple with Brenkerts and one with Motiograph bases (but they have Centurys now), but have never seen a theatre with Motiographs in operation.

 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 07-07-2002 02:16 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Scott, the Blue Fox Drive-in here in Oak Harbor still runs a Moshee, I believe.

But in the New England area, they are probably in someone's screening room or serving as a static display.


 |  IP: Logged

Paul G. Thompson
The Weenie Man

Posts: 4718
From: Mount Vernon WA USA
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 07-07-2002 02:27 PM      Profile for Paul G. Thompson   Email Paul G. Thompson   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Peter:

Side weave on the Brenkerts will happen because all the gate parts are finally worn out after 50 years. Replace the slides, guides and refurbish the the film gate lateral guide roller and set them to spec, and that problem will go away for another 50 years.

Porno houses and drive-in's liked the Brenkerts. You should have seen some of the crap I had to run through mine at the drive-in....

I think the Brenkerts and Motiographs are the only machines that would pass an 8-inch piece of film without any sprocket perfs whatsoever on one side without jumping out of frame or spitting the film out.

Does the old Carbon-Arc screening room in Seattle still run Motiographs?


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.