Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Why are Interpositive elements pink?

   
Author Topic: Why are Interpositive elements pink?
Michael Barry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 584
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 06-20-2002 01:13 PM      Profile for Michael Barry   Email Michael Barry   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I spent some time gaining work experience in DVD quality control, and one of the things I learned is that one of the signs that a transfer has been derived from an IP is that everything looks a bit reddish - the whites are a bit on the pink side and the reds are a bit too hot (although this depends, as some telecines can handle IPs better than others).

Recently, I visited a lab where they were screening an IP, and indeed the film is pink - very pink!

Why is this? Is this done for the same reasons that colour negative film is orange in colour? (Called a mask, if memory serves correctly.)

The second question is: why would someone want to project an IP? What would this tell you that screening a one-light workprint or timed print would not?

Thanks!

 |  IP: Logged

Bill Carter
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 162
From: Minneapolis, Minnesota
Registered: Sep 1999


 - posted 06-20-2002 03:03 PM      Profile for Bill Carter   Email Bill Carter   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Except possibly to evaluate quality in a lab setting, I don't know why anyone would project an IP. IP's typically aren't "married" composites, meaning they don't have any soundtrack. The IP does typically have all the opticals printed in.

The odd looking color saturation and gamma are to compensate for the amount that color and contrast will change when you dupe it.


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-20-2002 04:57 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Some labs project IPs to inspect them before spending any money to make duplicate negatives. Usually a special projector with velvet gates is used to minimize the risk of any damage.

For review, here is a link to Kodak information about film duplicating systems:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/h1/dealing.shtml

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-20-2002 10:01 PM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Orange Masking

As you know the image is formed of magenta (minus green), cyan (minus red) and yellow (minus blue) dyes. No dye is perfect in terms of what colors it passes and what are absorbed. Furthermore, the choice of what compounds to use as dyes is limited to what can be formed by the complex photographic chemistry. Thus, in the real world the dyes forming the image are absorbing some colors of light that they ought not to. This leads to errors as the image is printed. This isn't something you can correct for with the printing light because it varies across the image with the image itself.

The solution to this problem is the colored color coupler. The color coupler is the molecule which will form the color dye during development IF it's been activated by the appropriate color light. (OK, technically it's usually a reaction with the oxidation product of the developer after reaction with the silver compound but let's not go there.)

A colored color coupler is exactly like it sounds: It has a color to it before processing. The color, in this case, is designed to be very close to the UNWANTED light absorption of the dye molecule, if one is formed.

Consider the old adage, "if you can't beat'em, join'em". With colored color couplers this unwanted absorption is the same everywhere. At one point it's because dye has been formed and the dye has the erroneous absorption as well as the desired one. At another point no dye has been formed and the colored color coupler left behind creates the same unwanted absorption.

Now the unwanted absorption is the same everywhere and it can be compensated for with the color of the printing light but also more especially by the sensitivity designed into the material being printed on to. The combination of these unwanted absorptions appears as orange. On the unexposed parts of the film like the edges what you are seeing is entirely the colored color couplers. Within the image you are seeing a combination of them and spectrally deficient dyes. The same techniques is used on IP and IN stocks for the same reason it's used on camera negative.

That's why these film stocks are orange. But not why you are observing different looks on DVD transfers.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-21-2002 05:55 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gee Steve, good explanation of colored couplers. Did you ever work for Kodak?

Kodak invented colored couplers during the 1940's. The technology greatly improved the color reproduction of the negative-positive color system. Over 50 years later, every manufacturer of color film still uses this Kodak innovation in their color negative films.

A complete discussion of colored couplers and how they work is in the book "Principles of Color Photography" by Ralph M. Evans, Wesley T. Hanson and W. Lyle Brewer (the Kodak inventors), published by John Wylie and Sons, Inc., 1953. LOC Catalog 53-6722.

And some links:
http://www.kodak.com/country/US/en/motion/support/processing/sequence1.shtml
http://www.spinics.net/lists/scan/msg02606.html
http://frontiernet.net/~rlmsmw/photo/c41.htm
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/h1/


Colored couplers are only one of the many sophisticated technologies that Kodak has developed to improve the color and sharpness, and reduce the graininess of film. More improvements are on the way!

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Michael Barry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 584
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 06-21-2002 10:16 AM      Profile for Michael Barry   Email Michael Barry   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks, Steve!

And thanks for those links as well, John!

I had remembered the basic principle behind orange masking from my darkroom theory, but a) I have never understood it in such excellent detail and b) having never seen a motion picture IP or IN I didn't realise that they also used the same technology.

So once again, thanks for the excellent explanation.

As you say, the fact that IP transfers to video are a little on the pink side is not therefore related to this masking system. Can anyone tell me why IP and low-contrast IN elements produce such different results (again, depending on the telecine chain's ability to handle IP) particularly with respect to the pink bias that results from using IP elements?

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-21-2002 10:32 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Thanks John. High praise coming from you. I was going to joke that I'm after your job but I think you get too much snow out there. Then again, you do have your own railroad and then there are the LAD girls...

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-21-2002 10:38 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
For optimum quality, telecine transfers today are almost always made from a color-masked pre-print element, rather than a print. If a print must be used, Kodak makes a special low contrast print film for better telecine transfers:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products/lab/h12395t.shtml

There should be no contrast mismatch or color "bias" in a telecine transfer, regardless of the film type used. With modern telecines, even films faded by improper storage can usually be transferred with high quality results.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Michael Barry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 584
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 06-21-2002 11:04 AM      Profile for Michael Barry   Email Michael Barry   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oops...in my last post I referred to low-contrast internegs. That doesn't make any sense! I meant to say low-contrast prints...

OK, I think I've got it...with a low-contrast print, the telecine system doesn't have to deal with a mask at all, which is why the results are so (comparitively) neutral. An IP, on the other hand, is masked so the results depend on the telecine's ability to compensate for said mask. Any kind of film elements that are masked (which would be other than a regular pos print or low-con print) would be similar in this respect.

Thanks again for the ongoing help!

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-21-2002 11:51 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Almost any modern telecine handles color masked pre-print elements very well. A transfer from an IP or DN is the optimal way to go, followed by the Kodak Teleprint film. A projection contrast print is usually the least optimal.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Michael Barry
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 584
From: Sydney, NSW, Australia
Registered: Nov 1999


 - posted 06-21-2002 03:47 PM      Profile for Michael Barry   Email Michael Barry   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I suspect I may have been looking at slightly older transfers. To verify, I remembered that the new DVD of 'Seven' was transferred directly from the camera negative (which is very unusual according to the commentary track). They compare the new transfer with the previous one, and indeed the new transfer, done on a 2K spirit datacine with a DaVinci 2K colour corrector, has a very clean, neutral colour balance and a full contrast range, despite coming from a pre-print element.

Thanks for helping me sort out the confusion...


 |  IP: Logged

Stephen Furley
Film God

Posts: 3059
From: Coulsdon, Croydon, England
Registered: May 2002


 - posted 06-21-2002 04:57 PM      Profile for Stephen Furley   Email Stephen Furley   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Question to john,

As I understand it, there is just one type of intermediate stock, but it may be necessary to make an interneg from many various types of positive material, e.g. an interpos, or a 16mm Kodachrome original. These will obviously have vastly different contrast, how can they both be printed onto the same stock, to produce internegs of suitable contrast for standard prints to be made? It may even be necessary to intercut material from different sources, so they would have to be quite closly matched. I wouldn't have thought it would be possible to vary the standard ECN-2 process enough to produce the required contrast without creating other problems.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-21-2002 10:21 PM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Kodak makes a wide variety of duplicating films specifically for motion-picture labs:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products/postProducts.shtml

To make an internegative from a reversal original, you would normally use EASTMAN Color Internegative II Film 5272 / 7272:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products/lab/h15272.shtml

The ECN-2 process can be "pushed" or "pulled" slightly by varying developer time, but usually the process is run per Kodak specifications:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/processing/h24m7.shtml
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/processing/push.shtml

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion


 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 06-23-2002 08:22 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is it somewhat surprising that there is still just one intermediate stock for both IP's and dupe negatives? Granted that both situations require a low contrast / negative-going / masked stock but one might have thought there would be enough difference between these two situations to have them branch off into specialized products by now. Apparently not.

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 06-23-2002 10:19 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Whether the image is a positive (IP) or negative (DN), the characteristics required for the film are the same, since the scene information is placed on the "straight line" portion of the duplicating film. My Laboratory Aim Density (LAD) Control method helps labs achieve the proper "curve placement" for optimum duplication:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/support/h61/

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: +1 585 477 5325 Cell: +1 585 781 4036 Fax: +1 585 722 7243
e-mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.