Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Projectionistless Projector

   
Author Topic: Projectionistless Projector
Joe Redifer
You need a beating today

Posts: 12859
From: Denver, Colorado
Registered: May 99


 - posted 02-01-2002 01:34 AM      Profile for Joe Redifer   Author's Homepage   Email Joe Redifer   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ad from a trade magazine?


 |  IP: Logged

William Hardie
Film Handler

Posts: 8
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 02-01-2002 02:37 AM      Profile for William Hardie   Email William Hardie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Please see later post in this thread


 |  IP: Logged

Gerard S. Cohen
Jedi Master Film Handler

Posts: 975
From: Forest Hills, NY, USA
Registered: Sep 2001


 - posted 02-01-2002 12:16 PM      Profile for Gerard S. Cohen   Email Gerard S. Cohen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's a reaction from a retired projectionist in Pennsylvania:

Dear Mr Cohen
I certainly hope the poster was a gag. To tell you the
truth in the industry as it stands now I don't know
if such a thing IS a gag anymore. I can tell you this.
If there was such a contraption they wanted to sell
it on the merits of the fact that it had an
"automatic framer" they wouldn't sell a single one.
Running a whole show with the film out of frame or
out of focus with their current equipment does not
bother a lot of exhibitors now.
More later
Paul

 |  IP: Logged

Dave Williams
Wet nipple scene

Posts: 1836
From: Salt Lake City, UT, USA
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 02-01-2002 01:58 PM      Profile for Dave Williams   Author's Homepage   Email Dave Williams   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Actually, while this so called ad may be a gag, it is possible to automate threading and framing. You don't even have to thread it up once as this ad would state. It wouldn't take much to design it, and a laser guided framing system would look for the frame lines and always keep it in frame, even if you had a bad splice. The framing time would be within a few frames so no one would ever notice.

With todays projectionist having so little training as most owners dont truly care about it, it is a good idea. Hell you can use an imaging system to keep it in focus as well. All it would have to do is scan each fram as it goes through and match what is projected on screen. Todays technology is rather amazing.

Who cares anyway, it's all DVD in five years anyhow.

Dave

 |  IP: Logged

Mark Gulbrandsen
Resident Trollmaster

Posts: 16657
From: Music City
Registered: Jun 99


 - posted 02-02-2002 01:14 PM      Profile for Mark Gulbrandsen   Email Mark Gulbrandsen   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Gerard, Most "retired projectionists" don't have a clue as to what going on today, at least if they ave been retired for any length of time.
Is is certainly possible to automate all of this. No problem.
Mark @ GTS

 |  IP: Logged

Will Kutler
Phenomenal Film Handler

Posts: 1506
From: Tucson, AZ, USA
Registered: Feb 2001


 - posted 02-02-2002 01:42 PM      Profile for Will Kutler   Email Will Kutler   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mark!

I actually had an old time IATSE projectionist who is still working ask me if Simplex was still in business...he thought they were defunct!

 |  IP: Logged

Ethan Harper
E-dawggg!!!

Posts: 325
From: Plano, TX, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-02-2002 02:13 PM      Profile for Ethan Harper   Email Ethan Harper   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I was always hoping that robots would eventually take over my job or a really really smart monkey named George.

------------------
--"That's my story and i'm sticking to it!"--

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Kraus
Film God

Posts: 4094
From: Chicago, IL, USA
Registered: May 2000


 - posted 02-03-2002 01:25 AM      Profile for Steve Kraus     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Dave Williams wrote:
>The framing time would be within a few frames so no one would
>ever notice.

Actually with an electronic drive projector it can be done instantaneously (assuming you've figured out that it's out of frame). You simply command the stepper to advance 2, 3, 5, or whatever number of perfs instead of 4 as part of its normal pulldown.

 |  IP: Logged

William Hardie
Film Handler

Posts: 8
From: Calgary, AB, Canada
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 02-03-2002 03:43 AM      Profile for William Hardie   Email William Hardie   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have been asked to remove my post, and after it was explained to me why it made sense.

Anyhow it is late. I just worked a second 13.5 hour day, and I am tired.

I have a question about my Vic VIII's and an oil return problem which I will post then it is off to sleep.

Cheers,

Bill


 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)  
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.