Film-Tech Cinema Systems
Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE


  
my profile | my password | search | faq & rules | forum home
  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Film-Tech Forum ARCHIVE   » Operations   » Film Handlers' Forum   » Keystoning (Page 1)

 
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
Author Topic: Keystoning
David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 01-16-2002 10:47 AM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Suppose a large chain is building a new theatre from the ground up. This means they should know well in advance precisely what all the characteristics are for each auditorium: throw distances, the angle from the projector to the center of the screen (assume stadium seating), screen dimensions, etc. I'm assuming that modern optics can be computer-designed based on all this data, so the optics can theoretically then be optimized for each screen. True? If this is the case, then why would there still be some keystoning? Is it not possible to "design out" all the negatives and come up with optics that are near-perfect? Is there a cost-issue, where maybe engineering the optics to 90% perfection costs much less than striving for 100%? Or are they in fact just using standard "parts bin" optics that are not customized at all?

------------------
- dave
Crab juice, or Mountain Dew?


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-16-2002 11:04 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Although custom optics can be designed to correct for theatre design flaws that cause keystoning, "off-the-shelf" optics of common design are much less expensive.

At last week's ITEA Seminar Series in Los Angeles, Dwight Lindsay of Schneider Optics announced a new version (3.0) of their very useful free "Theatre Design Pro" software, that helps in choosing lenses and designing auditoriums:
http://www.schneideroptics.com/software/theatre_design_pro/

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Pat Moore
Master Film Handler

Posts: 363

Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-16-2002 11:26 AM      Profile for Pat Moore   Email Pat Moore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
David; this is as complicated a topic as the "focus" thread elsewhere in the forums.

Part of the charm of theatres is that each one is different -- in screen size, viewing and projection angels, throw and so on. To custom design and make optical systems for a particular cinema design is incredibly complicated as well as expensive. Even Multiplex operators that build "identical" auditoriums within cinemas find: 1) they are seldom really identical, and 2) the design needs to change anyway, whether the original design is used once or a few times.

Don't leave with the idea that today's projection optics are assembled from glass pieces out of a bunch of parts bins. These are very complicated optical designs, some of which take months and years to optimize and produce. Both ISCO and Schneider make products for a lot of industry segments, including cameras, medical imaging and other high technology lens requirements -- cinema projection lenses are among the most complicated designs they make.

What we can do is design cinemas within bounds that use incredibly good optics like the Isco Ultra Star Plus and Schneider within their design and performance limits. We can accommodate a certain amount of downangle projection now and minimize to tolerable levels, if not eliminate, keystoning effects now. Stadium seating designs have brought a whole new bunch of challenges to film and image projection.

Pat


 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-16-2002 11:41 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
To add to Pat Moore's posting, IscoOptic ALSO has free lens calculation software available on-line:
http://www.iscooptic.de/english/downloads/indexdown.htm

Isco (and other)lens adapters also allow some "perspective correction" for correcting moderate keystone distortion:
http://www.iscooptic.de/english/products/adaptered.htm http://www.iscooptic.de/english/products/adaptergold.htm

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 01-16-2002 12:31 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
JP is definitely right; custom optics would be prohibitedly (is that a real word?!) expensive. A well designed auditorium should have practically no keystoning.

People have tilted the screen itself to help reduce keystoning. Both ISCO and Schneider make a device that holds the lens on an angle to reduce keystoning (but it causes other problems.) Cheap lenses used in short throw theaters show a noticable pincushion; Again the ISCO and Schneider lenses do a better job at keeping focus in extreme situations.

The architect must work with the space he's given. If the space is, say, on funky angles because of the other buildings around it, the architect must be creative in squeezing in the required number of auditoriums to satify the business plan. This might mean "less-than-acceptable" scree/projector angles. (The bank may not lend you the money to build if there's not enough auditoriums; a single or too few might not generate enough money. )

 |  IP: Logged

Adam Martin
I'm not even gonna point out the irony.

Posts: 3686
From: Dallas, TX
Registered: Nov 2000


 - posted 01-16-2002 03:48 PM      Profile for Adam Martin   Author's Homepage   Email Adam Martin       Edit/Delete Post 
prohibitively.

It always seems like the building is designed from the lobby outward and the projection equipment is crammed into the leftover places that it shouldn't be.

Example: two auditoriums of the same size back-to-back where the projectors must be placed off-center in the narrow booth so that a human can walk between them, which creates not only keystoning, but reflections off of the port window bounce through the other port onto the other screen.


 |  IP: Logged

Philippe Laude
Film Handler

Posts: 79
From: Longueville, Belgium
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 01-17-2002 01:32 AM      Profile for Philippe Laude   Email Philippe Laude   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Pat, I'd like to meet those PROJJECTION ANGELS you're talking about.

Philippe

 |  IP: Logged

John Pytlak
Film God

Posts: 9987
From: Rochester, NY 14650-1922
Registered: Jan 2000


 - posted 01-17-2002 08:26 AM      Profile for John Pytlak   Author's Homepage   Email John Pytlak   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Phillippe said: "Pat, I'd like to meet those PROJJECTION ANGELS you're talking about."

I think they are hanging out with the TRAVEL GHOSTS.

------------------
John P. Pytlak, Senior Technical Specialist
Worldwide Technical Services, Entertainment Imaging
Research Labs, Building 69, Room 7525A
Rochester, New York, 14650-1922 USA
Tel: 716-477-5325 Cell: 716-781-4036 Fax: 716-722-7243
E-Mail: john.pytlak@kodak.com
Web site: http://www.kodak.com/go/motion

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-17-2002 08:46 AM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
PC-Adapters are great but all of them are for 101.6mm (4") lens mounts so your projector must be able to handle that. Projectors with lens turrets often have the PC adapter's beneifits (if to a lesser degree) built in in the form of adjustable horizontal and rotational stops.

When one uses a PC adatper, they are trading keystone effects for linearity affects (probably the lesser of the two when most people judge a picture).

When on shifts a lens, you have limits on both the entering pupil of the lens and the exiting portion of your lens system (including the PC adapter or turret). This is more of an issue with shorter focal length lenses (as are used in the bulk of "modern" theatres.

That said, Schneider just redesigned their PC adapter so the technology is being supported and is progressing. ISCO uses two eccentric cylinders that can allow about 5mm of shift at any point. Schneider has a slider for the lens tube so one can slide the lens about +/- 5mm (and maybe more). After that, with the Schneider adapter one can rotate the whole adapter to place the lens in the desired location. If one is merely trying to compensate for vertical keystone, then lock the adapter down with the slider in the vertical orientation and adjust until you picture is centered.

For those that have not used PC adapters, you haven't lived until you try to use one with a Scope lens! It WILL try your patience.

Steve

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Pat Moore
Master Film Handler

Posts: 363

Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-17-2002 12:02 PM      Profile for Pat Moore   Email Pat Moore   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Oops.

Angles, angels and ghosts, OH MY!

What can I say? I've seen a lot more ghosts than angels, that's for sure.

 |  IP: Logged

Philippe Laude
Film Handler

Posts: 79
From: Longueville, Belgium
Registered: Jul 99


 - posted 01-18-2002 03:03 PM      Profile for Philippe Laude   Email Philippe Laude   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Steve, you're right when you say:

<For those that have not used PC adapters, you haven't lived until you try to use one with a Scope lens! It WILL try your patience.>

I use an Isco PC adapter with an Isco Blue star anamorphic on a Bauer B11. The major problem is that almost each time I place the lens with its bracket (the B11 hasn't got a turret)it rotates somehow, although I handle it very, very carefully, so the image is a litlle crooked on the screen and I have to correct it.
I'm not sur I could express it clearly, my english being too poor.

Philippe

------------------

 |  IP: Logged

Steve Guttag
We forgot the crackers Gromit!!!

Posts: 12814
From: Annapolis, MD
Registered: Dec 1999


 - posted 01-18-2002 06:11 PM      Profile for Steve Guttag   Email Steve Guttag   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Your English is just fine...

How is the lens rotating? Is the ISCO adapter slipping? Or is your indexing ring slipping? I have a modification for the PC-Cine adapter that will stop it from slipping (and not render it useless) but it does require disassembly and some milling. ISCO could have gotten the lock mechanism a bit better on it. Why they haven't corrected the locking design is a mystery to me except they are bound to be low production as compared to other items.

When we design a multi-format booth (beyond the Flat/Scope lenses) then we use PC-Cine adapters quite a bit so all formats are centered on the screen. A recent installation had 11 lenses (5 on one projector and 6 on the other) and PC-Cine adapters are must to get all of those to center up. (the formats supported are 1.37, 1.66, 1.85, 2.39-Scope, Silent and 16mm on one projector).

Steve

------------------
"Old projectionists never die, they just changeover!"

 |  IP: Logged

Carl King
Expert Film Handler

Posts: 199
From: Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada
Registered: Mar 2000


 - posted 01-20-2002 12:10 PM      Profile for Carl King   Email Carl King   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Here's a question for you, John Pytlac. Will keystoning be a problem with digital cinema? I assume so because you will still have odd projection angles.

Carl king

 |  IP: Logged

David Stambaugh
Film God

Posts: 4021
From: Eugene, Oregon
Registered: Jan 2002


 - posted 01-20-2002 12:35 PM      Profile for David Stambaugh   Author's Homepage   Email David Stambaugh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Keystoning will still be an issue. Some LCD projectors claim to have built-in keystone-compensation. The one below claims "2D Digital Keystone Correction":
http://www.dukane.com/AudioVisual/products/9115.htm

------------------
- dave
Crab juice, or Mountain Dew?

 |  IP: Logged

John Walsh
Film God

Posts: 2490
From: Connecticut, USA, Earth, Milky Way
Registered: Oct 1999


 - posted 01-20-2002 12:48 PM      Profile for John Walsh   Email John Walsh   Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
While the "physics" of keystoning won't change (with digital projection) the projector itself can be simply mounted outside, in the auditorium, on the wall where ever it provides the best picture. It may need to be "blimped" so people don't hear fan noise, but that's far easier than a whole projection booth.

 |  IP: Logged



All times are Central (GMT -6:00)
This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2 
 
   Close Topic    Move Topic    Delete Topic    next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:



Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classicTM 6.3.1.2

The Film-Tech Forums are designed for various members related to the cinema industry to express their opinions, viewpoints and testimonials on various products, services and events based upon speculation, personal knowledge and factual information through use, therefore all views represented here allow no liability upon the publishers of this web site and the owners of said views assume no liability for any ill will resulting from these postings. The posts made here are for educational as well as entertainment purposes and as such anyone viewing this portion of the website must accept these views as statements of the author of that opinion and agrees to release the authors from any and all liability.

© 1999-2020 Film-Tech Cinema Systems, LLC. All rights reserved.